A critical analysis of the proportionality test in human rights adjudication
In this thesis I argue against the proportionality test in human rights adjudication, and provide a framework for understanding the proportionality debate. I identify two accounts of proportionality. One sees proportionality as a doctrinal tool aimed at maximising rights and public interests. The ot...
Päätekijät: | Urbina, F, Francisco Urbina |
---|---|
Muut tekijät: | Finnis, J |
Aineistotyyppi: | Opinnäyte |
Kieli: | English |
Julkaistu: |
2013
|
Aiheet: |
Samankaltaisia teoksia
-
Law and religious organizations: exceptions, non-interference and justification
Tekijä: Norton, JE
Julkaistu: (2012) -
The effect of the institutional features of the Indian system of personal laws on personal religious autonomy
Tekijä: Ahmed, F
Julkaistu: (2008) -
Kelsen and Raz on the continuity of legal systems: applying the accounts in an Australian context
Tekijä: Spagnolo, B
Julkaistu: (2013) -
An autonomy-based foundation for legal protection against discrimination
Tekijä: Khaitan, T
Julkaistu: (2010) -
The bases for the authority of the Australian Constitution
Tekijä: Daley, J
Julkaistu: (1999)