Proof constructions and evaluations

In this article, we focus on a group of 39 prospective elementary (grades K-6) teachers who had rich experiences with proof, and we examine their ability to construct proofs and evaluate their own constructions. We claim that the combined "construction-evaluation" activity helps illuminate...

Description complète

Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: Stylianides, A, Stylianides, G
Format: Journal article
Langue:English
Publié: Springer Netherlands 2009
Sujets:
_version_ 1826262846530387968
author Stylianides, A
Stylianides, G
author_facet Stylianides, A
Stylianides, G
author_sort Stylianides, A
collection OXFORD
description In this article, we focus on a group of 39 prospective elementary (grades K-6) teachers who had rich experiences with proof, and we examine their ability to construct proofs and evaluate their own constructions. We claim that the combined "construction-evaluation" activity helps illuminate certain aspects of prospective teachers' and presumably other individuals' understanding of proof that tend to defy scrutiny when individuals are asked to evaluate given arguments. For example, some prospective teachers in our study provided empirical arguments to mathematical statements, while being aware that their constructions were invalid. Thus, although these constructions considered alone could have been taken as evidence of an empirical conception of proof, the additional consideration of prospective teachers' evaluations of their own constructions overruled this interpretation and suggested a good understanding of the distinction between proofs and empirical arguments. We offer a possible account of our findings, and we discuss implications for research and instruction.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T19:42:32Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:212a5817-bbeb-462e-949e-d0955607acd6
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T19:42:32Z
publishDate 2009
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:212a5817-bbeb-462e-949e-d0955607acd62022-03-26T11:31:48ZProof constructions and evaluationsJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:212a5817-bbeb-462e-949e-d0955607acd6Teaching and teacher educationMathematicsEducationEnglishOxford University Research Archive - ValetSpringer Netherlands2009Stylianides, AStylianides, GIn this article, we focus on a group of 39 prospective elementary (grades K-6) teachers who had rich experiences with proof, and we examine their ability to construct proofs and evaluate their own constructions. We claim that the combined "construction-evaluation" activity helps illuminate certain aspects of prospective teachers' and presumably other individuals' understanding of proof that tend to defy scrutiny when individuals are asked to evaluate given arguments. For example, some prospective teachers in our study provided empirical arguments to mathematical statements, while being aware that their constructions were invalid. Thus, although these constructions considered alone could have been taken as evidence of an empirical conception of proof, the additional consideration of prospective teachers' evaluations of their own constructions overruled this interpretation and suggested a good understanding of the distinction between proofs and empirical arguments. We offer a possible account of our findings, and we discuss implications for research and instruction.
spellingShingle Teaching and teacher education
Mathematics
Education
Stylianides, A
Stylianides, G
Proof constructions and evaluations
title Proof constructions and evaluations
title_full Proof constructions and evaluations
title_fullStr Proof constructions and evaluations
title_full_unstemmed Proof constructions and evaluations
title_short Proof constructions and evaluations
title_sort proof constructions and evaluations
topic Teaching and teacher education
Mathematics
Education
work_keys_str_mv AT stylianidesa proofconstructionsandevaluations
AT stylianidesg proofconstructionsandevaluations