September v. Subramoney and its implications for transgender persons in South Africa
This article discusses the case of <i>September v. Subramoney</i> heard in 2019 in the Equality Court. Following a discussion of the case, the article examines the implications of this case for future jurisprudence with reference to the use of non-binding international law in South Afric...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Edinburgh University Press
2021
|
| _version_ | 1817930761647423488 |
|---|---|
| author | Sloth-Nielsen, R |
| author_facet | Sloth-Nielsen, R |
| author_sort | Sloth-Nielsen, R |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | This article discusses the case of <i>September v. Subramoney</i> heard in 2019 in the Equality Court. Following a discussion of the case, the article examines the implications of this case for future jurisprudence with reference to the use of non-binding international law in South African litigation, the implications this case has for other transgender inmates as well as its implications for other state institutions, for example the principle of reasonable accommodation in so far as it applies to transgender persons, the recognition of gender identity as an analogous ground in discrimination law, and the endurance of the binary model of gender identification in South Africa. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-09T03:11:16Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:2156aa02-0815-4893-8424-5d8b9654ac6f |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-09T03:11:16Z |
| publishDate | 2021 |
| publisher | Edinburgh University Press |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:2156aa02-0815-4893-8424-5d8b9654ac6f2024-10-10T15:35:18ZSeptember v. Subramoney and its implications for transgender persons in South AfricaJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:2156aa02-0815-4893-8424-5d8b9654ac6fEnglishSymplectic ElementsEdinburgh University Press2021Sloth-Nielsen, RThis article discusses the case of <i>September v. Subramoney</i> heard in 2019 in the Equality Court. Following a discussion of the case, the article examines the implications of this case for future jurisprudence with reference to the use of non-binding international law in South African litigation, the implications this case has for other transgender inmates as well as its implications for other state institutions, for example the principle of reasonable accommodation in so far as it applies to transgender persons, the recognition of gender identity as an analogous ground in discrimination law, and the endurance of the binary model of gender identification in South Africa. |
| spellingShingle | Sloth-Nielsen, R September v. Subramoney and its implications for transgender persons in South Africa |
| title | September v. Subramoney and its implications for transgender persons in South Africa |
| title_full | September v. Subramoney and its implications for transgender persons in South Africa |
| title_fullStr | September v. Subramoney and its implications for transgender persons in South Africa |
| title_full_unstemmed | September v. Subramoney and its implications for transgender persons in South Africa |
| title_short | September v. Subramoney and its implications for transgender persons in South Africa |
| title_sort | september v subramoney and its implications for transgender persons in south africa |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT slothnielsenr septembervsubramoneyanditsimplicationsfortransgenderpersonsinsouthafrica |