The effect of socioeconomic disadvantage on prescription of guideline-recommended medications for patients with acute coronary syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis

<strong>Background</strong> There are varying data on whether socioeconomic status (SES) affects the treatment in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Our aim was to obtain a reliable estimate of the effect of SES on discharge prescription of medications following an ACS through...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hyun, K, Brieger, D, Woodward, M, Richtering, S, Redfern, J
Format: Journal article
Published: BioMed Central 2017
_version_ 1797057998889156608
author Hyun, K
Brieger, D
Woodward, M
Richtering, S
Redfern, J
author_facet Hyun, K
Brieger, D
Woodward, M
Richtering, S
Redfern, J
author_sort Hyun, K
collection OXFORD
description <strong>Background</strong> There are varying data on whether socioeconomic status (SES) affects the treatment in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Our aim was to obtain a reliable estimate of the effect of SES on discharge prescription of medications following an ACS through systematic review and meta-analysis. <strong>Methods</strong> Medline, EMBASE and Global Health were searched systematically on 6th April 2016. Studies were eligible if the participants had ACS and reported the rate/odds of guideline-recommended ACS medications prescription (aspirin, antiplatelet, beta blocker, angiotensin co-enzyme inhibitors (ACEi)/angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) and statin) at discharge stratified by SES. A meta-analysis was performed to pool the estimates, comparing the prescription ratio (PR) between the lowest and the highest SES groups. <strong>Results</strong> Of 252 articles found from the search, seven met the eligibility criteria and it included 41,462 (20,986 from the lowest SES group) patients. We found that the individual/neighbourhood level SES did not affect the prescription of aspirin (PR (95% CI): 0.97 (0.91, 1.03)), but for beta blocker and statin, the lowest SES group were disadvantaged (0.84 (0.73, 0.94), 0.80 (0.62, 0.98), respectively). In contrast, ACEi were prescribed more often to the lowest individual/neighbourhood level SES group than the highest (1.13 (1.05, 1.22)). Although the risk of bias was low, there was considerable heterogeneity between the studies. <strong>Conclusions</strong> Despite the recommendations to close the treatment gap, the rate of prescription of guideline-recommended medications in managing ACS is significantly different between patients with the lowest and the highest groups. A solution is needed to provide equitable care across the SES groups.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T19:44:22Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:21c39485-e720-4fa0-a222-4f0b46d5dcef
institution University of Oxford
last_indexed 2024-03-06T19:44:22Z
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:21c39485-e720-4fa0-a222-4f0b46d5dcef2022-03-26T11:35:11ZThe effect of socioeconomic disadvantage on prescription of guideline-recommended medications for patients with acute coronary syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysisJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:21c39485-e720-4fa0-a222-4f0b46d5dcefSymplectic Elements at OxfordBioMed Central2017Hyun, KBrieger, DWoodward, MRichtering, SRedfern, J<strong>Background</strong> There are varying data on whether socioeconomic status (SES) affects the treatment in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Our aim was to obtain a reliable estimate of the effect of SES on discharge prescription of medications following an ACS through systematic review and meta-analysis. <strong>Methods</strong> Medline, EMBASE and Global Health were searched systematically on 6th April 2016. Studies were eligible if the participants had ACS and reported the rate/odds of guideline-recommended ACS medications prescription (aspirin, antiplatelet, beta blocker, angiotensin co-enzyme inhibitors (ACEi)/angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) and statin) at discharge stratified by SES. A meta-analysis was performed to pool the estimates, comparing the prescription ratio (PR) between the lowest and the highest SES groups. <strong>Results</strong> Of 252 articles found from the search, seven met the eligibility criteria and it included 41,462 (20,986 from the lowest SES group) patients. We found that the individual/neighbourhood level SES did not affect the prescription of aspirin (PR (95% CI): 0.97 (0.91, 1.03)), but for beta blocker and statin, the lowest SES group were disadvantaged (0.84 (0.73, 0.94), 0.80 (0.62, 0.98), respectively). In contrast, ACEi were prescribed more often to the lowest individual/neighbourhood level SES group than the highest (1.13 (1.05, 1.22)). Although the risk of bias was low, there was considerable heterogeneity between the studies. <strong>Conclusions</strong> Despite the recommendations to close the treatment gap, the rate of prescription of guideline-recommended medications in managing ACS is significantly different between patients with the lowest and the highest groups. A solution is needed to provide equitable care across the SES groups.
spellingShingle Hyun, K
Brieger, D
Woodward, M
Richtering, S
Redfern, J
The effect of socioeconomic disadvantage on prescription of guideline-recommended medications for patients with acute coronary syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis
title The effect of socioeconomic disadvantage on prescription of guideline-recommended medications for patients with acute coronary syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full The effect of socioeconomic disadvantage on prescription of guideline-recommended medications for patients with acute coronary syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr The effect of socioeconomic disadvantage on prescription of guideline-recommended medications for patients with acute coronary syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The effect of socioeconomic disadvantage on prescription of guideline-recommended medications for patients with acute coronary syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short The effect of socioeconomic disadvantage on prescription of guideline-recommended medications for patients with acute coronary syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort effect of socioeconomic disadvantage on prescription of guideline recommended medications for patients with acute coronary syndrome systematic review and meta analysis
work_keys_str_mv AT hyunk theeffectofsocioeconomicdisadvantageonprescriptionofguidelinerecommendedmedicationsforpatientswithacutecoronarysyndromesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT briegerd theeffectofsocioeconomicdisadvantageonprescriptionofguidelinerecommendedmedicationsforpatientswithacutecoronarysyndromesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT woodwardm theeffectofsocioeconomicdisadvantageonprescriptionofguidelinerecommendedmedicationsforpatientswithacutecoronarysyndromesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT richterings theeffectofsocioeconomicdisadvantageonprescriptionofguidelinerecommendedmedicationsforpatientswithacutecoronarysyndromesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT redfernj theeffectofsocioeconomicdisadvantageonprescriptionofguidelinerecommendedmedicationsforpatientswithacutecoronarysyndromesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hyunk effectofsocioeconomicdisadvantageonprescriptionofguidelinerecommendedmedicationsforpatientswithacutecoronarysyndromesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT briegerd effectofsocioeconomicdisadvantageonprescriptionofguidelinerecommendedmedicationsforpatientswithacutecoronarysyndromesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT woodwardm effectofsocioeconomicdisadvantageonprescriptionofguidelinerecommendedmedicationsforpatientswithacutecoronarysyndromesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT richterings effectofsocioeconomicdisadvantageonprescriptionofguidelinerecommendedmedicationsforpatientswithacutecoronarysyndromesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT redfernj effectofsocioeconomicdisadvantageonprescriptionofguidelinerecommendedmedicationsforpatientswithacutecoronarysyndromesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis