The effectiveness of psychological intervention in primary care: a comparative analysis of outcome ratings.
A series of consecutively referred outpatients were independently rated, on a treatment outcome measure, by psychologists, general practitioners and the patients themselves. Statistical comparisons revealed high inter-rater agreement and indicated that 43% of the patients had reliably achieved eithe...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
1986
|
| _version_ | 1826262982841073664 |
|---|---|
| author | Espie, C White, J |
| author_facet | Espie, C White, J |
| author_sort | Espie, C |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | A series of consecutively referred outpatients were independently rated, on a treatment outcome measure, by psychologists, general practitioners and the patients themselves. Statistical comparisons revealed high inter-rater agreement and indicated that 43% of the patients had reliably achieved either moderate or marked improvement and 75% had shown at least slight improvement. Favourable outcome was particularly associated with the psychological treatment of anxiety and stress disorders. These results are discussed with reference to previous reports. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-06T19:44:27Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:21cafbda-4eee-4cb8-bde4-4e0c3152fbfc |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-06T19:44:27Z |
| publishDate | 1986 |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:21cafbda-4eee-4cb8-bde4-4e0c3152fbfc2022-03-26T11:35:17ZThe effectiveness of psychological intervention in primary care: a comparative analysis of outcome ratings.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:21cafbda-4eee-4cb8-bde4-4e0c3152fbfcEnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford1986Espie, CWhite, JA series of consecutively referred outpatients were independently rated, on a treatment outcome measure, by psychologists, general practitioners and the patients themselves. Statistical comparisons revealed high inter-rater agreement and indicated that 43% of the patients had reliably achieved either moderate or marked improvement and 75% had shown at least slight improvement. Favourable outcome was particularly associated with the psychological treatment of anxiety and stress disorders. These results are discussed with reference to previous reports. |
| spellingShingle | Espie, C White, J The effectiveness of psychological intervention in primary care: a comparative analysis of outcome ratings. |
| title | The effectiveness of psychological intervention in primary care: a comparative analysis of outcome ratings. |
| title_full | The effectiveness of psychological intervention in primary care: a comparative analysis of outcome ratings. |
| title_fullStr | The effectiveness of psychological intervention in primary care: a comparative analysis of outcome ratings. |
| title_full_unstemmed | The effectiveness of psychological intervention in primary care: a comparative analysis of outcome ratings. |
| title_short | The effectiveness of psychological intervention in primary care: a comparative analysis of outcome ratings. |
| title_sort | effectiveness of psychological intervention in primary care a comparative analysis of outcome ratings |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT espiec theeffectivenessofpsychologicalinterventioninprimarycareacomparativeanalysisofoutcomeratings AT whitej theeffectivenessofpsychologicalinterventioninprimarycareacomparativeanalysisofoutcomeratings AT espiec effectivenessofpsychologicalinterventioninprimarycareacomparativeanalysisofoutcomeratings AT whitej effectivenessofpsychologicalinterventioninprimarycareacomparativeanalysisofoutcomeratings |