Physiotherapy breathing retraining for asthma: a randomised controlled trial.
<h4>Background</h4> <p>Despite effective pharmacotherapy, asthma continues to impair quality of life for most patients. Nonpharmacological approaches, including breathing retraining, are therefore of great interest to patients. However, clinicians rarely advocate breathing retrain...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2017
|
| _version_ | 1826263054207156224 |
|---|---|
| author | Bruton, A Lee, A Yardley, L Raftery, J Arden-Close, E Kirby, S Zhu, S Thiruvothiyur, M Webley, F Taylor, L Gibson, D Yao, G Stafford-Watson, M Versnel, J Moore, M George, S Little, P Djukanovic, R Price, D Pavord, I Holgate, S Thomas, M |
| author_facet | Bruton, A Lee, A Yardley, L Raftery, J Arden-Close, E Kirby, S Zhu, S Thiruvothiyur, M Webley, F Taylor, L Gibson, D Yao, G Stafford-Watson, M Versnel, J Moore, M George, S Little, P Djukanovic, R Price, D Pavord, I Holgate, S Thomas, M |
| author_sort | Bruton, A |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | <h4>Background</h4> <p>Despite effective pharmacotherapy, asthma continues to impair quality of life for most patients. Nonpharmacological approaches, including breathing retraining, are therefore of great interest to patients. However, clinicians rarely advocate breathing retraining and access to this intervention is restricted for most patients due to the limited availability of suitable physiotherapists and poor integration of breathing retraining into standard care. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of a digital self-guided breathing retraining intervention.</p> <h4>Methods</h4> <p>In this randomised controlled trial, we recruited patients from 34 general practices in the UK. Eligibility criteria for patients with asthma were broad, comprising a physician diagnosis of asthma, age of 16–70 years, receipt of at least one anti-asthma medication in the previous year, and impaired asthma-related quality of life (Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire [AQLQ] score of <5·5). We developed a self-guided intervention, which was delivered as a DVD plus a printed booklet (DVDB). Participants were randomly assigned to receive either the DVDB intervention, three face-to-face breathing retraining sessions, or standard care, in a 2:1:2 ratio, for 12 months. Randomisation was achieved using the Southampton Clinical Trials Unit telephone randomisation service by use of random number generators. The primary outcome was the AQLQ score in the intention-to-treat population at 12 months. The trial was powered to show equivalence between the two active intervention groups, and superiority of both intervention groups over usual care. Secondary outcomes included patient-reported and physiological measures of asthma control, patient acceptability, and health-care costs. This trial was registered with International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number registry, number ISRCTN88318003.</p> <h4>Findings</h4> <p>Between Nov 5, 2012 and Jan 28, 2014, invitations to participate in the study were sent to 15 203 patients with general practitioner-diagnosed asthma, of whom 655 were recruited into the study. AQLQ scores at 12 months were significantly higher in the DVDB group (mean 5·40, SD 1·14) than in the usual care group (5·12, SD 1·17; adjusted mean difference 0·28, 95% CI 0·11 to 0·44), and in the face-to-face group (5·33, SD 1·06) than in the usual care group (adjusted mean difference 0·24, 95% CI 0·04 to 0·44); AQLQ scores were similar between the DVDB group and the face-to-face group (0·04, 95% CI –0·16 to 0·24). There were no significant differences between the randomisation groups in FEV1 or fraction of exhaled nitric oxide. 744 adverse events occurred in 272 patients: 101 (39%) of 261 patients in the DVDB group, 55 (42%) of 132 patients in the face-to-face group, and 132 (50%) of 262 in the usual care group, with patients reporting one or more event. 11 (4%) patients in the DVDB group, four (3%) patients in the face-to-face group, and 20 (8%) patients in the usual care group had a serious adverse event.</p> <h4>Interpretation</h4> <p>Breathing retraining programmes improve quality of life in patients with incompletely controlled asthma despite having little effect on lung function or airway inflammation. Such programmes can be delivered conveniently and cost-effectively as a self-guided digital audiovisual programme, so might also reduce health-care costs.</p> |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-06T19:45:35Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:22312ed1-3e16-4802-af1f-9c91203e8e6e |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-06T19:45:35Z |
| publishDate | 2017 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:22312ed1-3e16-4802-af1f-9c91203e8e6e2022-03-26T11:37:26ZPhysiotherapy breathing retraining for asthma: a randomised controlled trial.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:22312ed1-3e16-4802-af1f-9c91203e8e6eEnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordElsevier2017Bruton, ALee, AYardley, LRaftery, JArden-Close, EKirby, SZhu, SThiruvothiyur, MWebley, FTaylor, LGibson, DYao, GStafford-Watson, MVersnel, JMoore, MGeorge, SLittle, PDjukanovic, RPrice, DPavord, IHolgate, SThomas, M <h4>Background</h4> <p>Despite effective pharmacotherapy, asthma continues to impair quality of life for most patients. Nonpharmacological approaches, including breathing retraining, are therefore of great interest to patients. However, clinicians rarely advocate breathing retraining and access to this intervention is restricted for most patients due to the limited availability of suitable physiotherapists and poor integration of breathing retraining into standard care. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of a digital self-guided breathing retraining intervention.</p> <h4>Methods</h4> <p>In this randomised controlled trial, we recruited patients from 34 general practices in the UK. Eligibility criteria for patients with asthma were broad, comprising a physician diagnosis of asthma, age of 16–70 years, receipt of at least one anti-asthma medication in the previous year, and impaired asthma-related quality of life (Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire [AQLQ] score of <5·5). We developed a self-guided intervention, which was delivered as a DVD plus a printed booklet (DVDB). Participants were randomly assigned to receive either the DVDB intervention, three face-to-face breathing retraining sessions, or standard care, in a 2:1:2 ratio, for 12 months. Randomisation was achieved using the Southampton Clinical Trials Unit telephone randomisation service by use of random number generators. The primary outcome was the AQLQ score in the intention-to-treat population at 12 months. The trial was powered to show equivalence between the two active intervention groups, and superiority of both intervention groups over usual care. Secondary outcomes included patient-reported and physiological measures of asthma control, patient acceptability, and health-care costs. This trial was registered with International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number registry, number ISRCTN88318003.</p> <h4>Findings</h4> <p>Between Nov 5, 2012 and Jan 28, 2014, invitations to participate in the study were sent to 15 203 patients with general practitioner-diagnosed asthma, of whom 655 were recruited into the study. AQLQ scores at 12 months were significantly higher in the DVDB group (mean 5·40, SD 1·14) than in the usual care group (5·12, SD 1·17; adjusted mean difference 0·28, 95% CI 0·11 to 0·44), and in the face-to-face group (5·33, SD 1·06) than in the usual care group (adjusted mean difference 0·24, 95% CI 0·04 to 0·44); AQLQ scores were similar between the DVDB group and the face-to-face group (0·04, 95% CI –0·16 to 0·24). There were no significant differences between the randomisation groups in FEV1 or fraction of exhaled nitric oxide. 744 adverse events occurred in 272 patients: 101 (39%) of 261 patients in the DVDB group, 55 (42%) of 132 patients in the face-to-face group, and 132 (50%) of 262 in the usual care group, with patients reporting one or more event. 11 (4%) patients in the DVDB group, four (3%) patients in the face-to-face group, and 20 (8%) patients in the usual care group had a serious adverse event.</p> <h4>Interpretation</h4> <p>Breathing retraining programmes improve quality of life in patients with incompletely controlled asthma despite having little effect on lung function or airway inflammation. Such programmes can be delivered conveniently and cost-effectively as a self-guided digital audiovisual programme, so might also reduce health-care costs.</p> |
| spellingShingle | Bruton, A Lee, A Yardley, L Raftery, J Arden-Close, E Kirby, S Zhu, S Thiruvothiyur, M Webley, F Taylor, L Gibson, D Yao, G Stafford-Watson, M Versnel, J Moore, M George, S Little, P Djukanovic, R Price, D Pavord, I Holgate, S Thomas, M Physiotherapy breathing retraining for asthma: a randomised controlled trial. |
| title | Physiotherapy breathing retraining for asthma: a randomised controlled trial. |
| title_full | Physiotherapy breathing retraining for asthma: a randomised controlled trial. |
| title_fullStr | Physiotherapy breathing retraining for asthma: a randomised controlled trial. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Physiotherapy breathing retraining for asthma: a randomised controlled trial. |
| title_short | Physiotherapy breathing retraining for asthma: a randomised controlled trial. |
| title_sort | physiotherapy breathing retraining for asthma a randomised controlled trial |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT brutona physiotherapybreathingretrainingforasthmaarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT leea physiotherapybreathingretrainingforasthmaarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT yardleyl physiotherapybreathingretrainingforasthmaarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT rafteryj physiotherapybreathingretrainingforasthmaarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT ardenclosee physiotherapybreathingretrainingforasthmaarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT kirbys physiotherapybreathingretrainingforasthmaarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT zhus physiotherapybreathingretrainingforasthmaarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT thiruvothiyurm physiotherapybreathingretrainingforasthmaarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT webleyf physiotherapybreathingretrainingforasthmaarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT taylorl physiotherapybreathingretrainingforasthmaarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT gibsond physiotherapybreathingretrainingforasthmaarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT yaog physiotherapybreathingretrainingforasthmaarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT staffordwatsonm physiotherapybreathingretrainingforasthmaarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT versnelj physiotherapybreathingretrainingforasthmaarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT moorem physiotherapybreathingretrainingforasthmaarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT georges physiotherapybreathingretrainingforasthmaarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT littlep physiotherapybreathingretrainingforasthmaarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT djukanovicr physiotherapybreathingretrainingforasthmaarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT priced physiotherapybreathingretrainingforasthmaarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT pavordi physiotherapybreathingretrainingforasthmaarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT holgates physiotherapybreathingretrainingforasthmaarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT thomasm physiotherapybreathingretrainingforasthmaarandomisedcontrolledtrial |