Bargaining for bribes under uncertainty

A corrupt transaction is often the result of bargaining between the parties involved. This paper models bribery as a double auction where a private citizen and a public official strategically interact as the potential buyer and the potential seller of a corrupt service. Individuals differ in the int...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Serra, D
Format: Working paper
Language:English
Published: 2008
Subjects:
_version_ 1826263085117079552
author Serra, D
author_facet Serra, D
author_sort Serra, D
collection OXFORD
description A corrupt transaction is often the result of bargaining between the parties involved. This paper models bribery as a double auction where a private citizen and a public official strategically interact as the potential buyer and the potential seller of a corrupt service. Individuals differ in the internalized moral cost generated by corruption, and may have only imperfect information on others' moral cost, i.e. their "corruptibility". This paper investigates the role the imperfect information with respect to the "corruptibility" of one's potential partner in corruption plays in his or her propensity to engage in bribery, and, consequently, the equilibrium level of corruption in a society. We find that corruption is lower when potential bribers and potential bribees are uncertain regarding each other's "corruptibility". This paper provides therefore theoretical support to anti-corruption strategies, such as staff rotation in public offices, aimed at decreasing the social closeness of bribers and bribees.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T19:46:06Z
format Working paper
id oxford-uuid:2257e3d3-733b-4712-8140-261d6ae2effa
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T19:46:06Z
publishDate 2008
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:2257e3d3-733b-4712-8140-261d6ae2effa2022-03-26T11:38:17ZBargaining for bribes under uncertaintyWorking paperhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_8042uuid:2257e3d3-733b-4712-8140-261d6ae2effaMicroeconomicsEconomicsEnglishOxford University Research Archive - Valet2008Serra, DA corrupt transaction is often the result of bargaining between the parties involved. This paper models bribery as a double auction where a private citizen and a public official strategically interact as the potential buyer and the potential seller of a corrupt service. Individuals differ in the internalized moral cost generated by corruption, and may have only imperfect information on others' moral cost, i.e. their "corruptibility". This paper investigates the role the imperfect information with respect to the "corruptibility" of one's potential partner in corruption plays in his or her propensity to engage in bribery, and, consequently, the equilibrium level of corruption in a society. We find that corruption is lower when potential bribers and potential bribees are uncertain regarding each other's "corruptibility". This paper provides therefore theoretical support to anti-corruption strategies, such as staff rotation in public offices, aimed at decreasing the social closeness of bribers and bribees.
spellingShingle Microeconomics
Economics
Serra, D
Bargaining for bribes under uncertainty
title Bargaining for bribes under uncertainty
title_full Bargaining for bribes under uncertainty
title_fullStr Bargaining for bribes under uncertainty
title_full_unstemmed Bargaining for bribes under uncertainty
title_short Bargaining for bribes under uncertainty
title_sort bargaining for bribes under uncertainty
topic Microeconomics
Economics
work_keys_str_mv AT serrad bargainingforbribesunderuncertainty