Efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Covid-19 vaccine against the B.1.351 variant

<p><strong>Background</strong></p> Assessment of the safety and efficacy of vaccines against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in different populations is essential, as is investigation of the efficacy of the vaccines against emerging SARS-CoV-2...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Madhi, SA, Baillie, V, Cutland, CL, Voysey, M, Koen, AL, Fairlie, L, Padayachee, SD, Dheda, K, Barnabas, SL, Bhorat, QE, Briner, C, Kwatra, G, Ahmed, K, Aley, P, Bhikha, S, Bhiman, JN, Bhorat, AE, du Plessis, J, Esmail, A, Groenewald, M, Horne, E, Hwa, S-H, Jose, A, Lambe, T, Laubscher, M, Malahleha, M, Masenya, M, Masilela, M, McKenzie, S, Molapo, K, Moultrie, A, Oelofse, S, Patel, F, Pillay, S, Rhead, S, Rodel, H, Rossouw, L, Taoushanis, C, Tegally, H, Thombrayil, A, van Eck, S, Wibmer, CK, Durham, NM, Kelly, EJ, Villafana, TL, Gilbert, S, Pollard, AJ, de Oliveira, T, Moore, PL, Sigal, A, Izu, A
Other Authors: NGS-SA Group
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Massachusetts Medical Society 2021
_version_ 1826263122507202560
author Madhi, SA
Baillie, V
Cutland, CL
Voysey, M
Koen, AL
Fairlie, L
Padayachee, SD
Dheda, K
Barnabas, SL
Bhorat, QE
Briner, C
Kwatra, G
Ahmed, K
Aley, P
Bhikha, S
Bhiman, JN
Bhorat, AE
du Plessis, J
Esmail, A
Groenewald, M
Horne, E
Hwa, S-H
Jose, A
Lambe, T
Laubscher, M
Malahleha, M
Masenya, M
Masilela, M
McKenzie, S
Molapo, K
Moultrie, A
Oelofse, S
Patel, F
Pillay, S
Rhead, S
Rodel, H
Rossouw, L
Taoushanis, C
Tegally, H
Thombrayil, A
van Eck, S
Wibmer, CK
Durham, NM
Kelly, EJ
Villafana, TL
Gilbert, S
Pollard, AJ
de Oliveira, T
Moore, PL
Sigal, A
Izu, A
author2 NGS-SA Group
author_facet NGS-SA Group
Madhi, SA
Baillie, V
Cutland, CL
Voysey, M
Koen, AL
Fairlie, L
Padayachee, SD
Dheda, K
Barnabas, SL
Bhorat, QE
Briner, C
Kwatra, G
Ahmed, K
Aley, P
Bhikha, S
Bhiman, JN
Bhorat, AE
du Plessis, J
Esmail, A
Groenewald, M
Horne, E
Hwa, S-H
Jose, A
Lambe, T
Laubscher, M
Malahleha, M
Masenya, M
Masilela, M
McKenzie, S
Molapo, K
Moultrie, A
Oelofse, S
Patel, F
Pillay, S
Rhead, S
Rodel, H
Rossouw, L
Taoushanis, C
Tegally, H
Thombrayil, A
van Eck, S
Wibmer, CK
Durham, NM
Kelly, EJ
Villafana, TL
Gilbert, S
Pollard, AJ
de Oliveira, T
Moore, PL
Sigal, A
Izu, A
author_sort Madhi, SA
collection OXFORD
description <p><strong>Background</strong></p> Assessment of the safety and efficacy of vaccines against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in different populations is essential, as is investigation of the efficacy of the vaccines against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern, including the B.1.351 (501Y.V2) variant first identified in South Africa. <p><strong>Methods</strong></p> We conducted a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial to assess the safety and efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (AZD1222) in people not infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in South Africa. Participants 18 to less than 65 years of age were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive two doses of vaccine containing 5×1010 viral particles or placebo (0.9% sodium chloride solution) 21 to 35 days apart. Serum samples obtained from 25 participants after the second dose were tested by pseudovirus and live-virus neutralization assays against the original D614G virus and the B.1.351 variant. The primary end points were safety and efficacy of the vaccine against laboratory-confirmed symptomatic coronavirus 2019 illness (Covid-19) more than 14 days after the second dose. <p><strong>Results</strong></p> Between June 24 and November 9, 2020, we enrolled 2026 HIV-negative adults (median age, 30 years); 1010 and 1011 participants received at least one dose of placebo or vaccine, respectively. Both the pseudovirus and the live-virus neutralization assays showed greater resistance to the B.1.351 variant in serum samples obtained from vaccine recipients than in samples from placebo recipients. In the primary end-point analysis, mild-to-moderate Covid-19 developed in 23 of 717 placebo recipients (3.2%) and in 19 of 750 vaccine recipients (2.5%), for an efficacy of 21.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], −49.9 to 59.8). Among the 42 participants with Covid-19, 39 cases (95.1% of 41 with sequencing data) were caused by the B.1.351 variant; vaccine efficacy against this variant, analyzed as a secondary end point, was 10.4% (95% CI, −76.8 to 54.8). The incidence of serious adverse events was balanced between the vaccine and placebo groups. <p><strong>Conclusions</strong></p> A two-dose regimen of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine did not show protection against mild-to-moderate Covid-19 due to the B.1.351 variant. (Funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04444674; Pan African Clinical Trials Registry number, PACTR202006922165132.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T19:46:41Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:228a27c1-5682-4dbb-9842-b7b5b0a5fe42
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T19:46:41Z
publishDate 2021
publisher Massachusetts Medical Society
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:228a27c1-5682-4dbb-9842-b7b5b0a5fe422022-03-26T11:39:29ZEfficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Covid-19 vaccine against the B.1.351 variantJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:228a27c1-5682-4dbb-9842-b7b5b0a5fe42EnglishSymplectic ElementsMassachusetts Medical Society2021Madhi, SABaillie, VCutland, CLVoysey, MKoen, ALFairlie, LPadayachee, SDDheda, KBarnabas, SLBhorat, QEBriner, CKwatra, GAhmed, KAley, PBhikha, SBhiman, JNBhorat, AEdu Plessis, JEsmail, AGroenewald, MHorne, EHwa, S-HJose, ALambe, TLaubscher, MMalahleha, MMasenya, MMasilela, MMcKenzie, SMolapo, KMoultrie, AOelofse, SPatel, FPillay, SRhead, SRodel, HRossouw, LTaoushanis, CTegally, HThombrayil, Avan Eck, SWibmer, CKDurham, NMKelly, EJVillafana, TLGilbert, SPollard, AJde Oliveira, TMoore, PLSigal, AIzu, ANGS-SA GroupWits-VIDA COVID Group<p><strong>Background</strong></p> Assessment of the safety and efficacy of vaccines against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in different populations is essential, as is investigation of the efficacy of the vaccines against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern, including the B.1.351 (501Y.V2) variant first identified in South Africa. <p><strong>Methods</strong></p> We conducted a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial to assess the safety and efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (AZD1222) in people not infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in South Africa. Participants 18 to less than 65 years of age were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive two doses of vaccine containing 5×1010 viral particles or placebo (0.9% sodium chloride solution) 21 to 35 days apart. Serum samples obtained from 25 participants after the second dose were tested by pseudovirus and live-virus neutralization assays against the original D614G virus and the B.1.351 variant. The primary end points were safety and efficacy of the vaccine against laboratory-confirmed symptomatic coronavirus 2019 illness (Covid-19) more than 14 days after the second dose. <p><strong>Results</strong></p> Between June 24 and November 9, 2020, we enrolled 2026 HIV-negative adults (median age, 30 years); 1010 and 1011 participants received at least one dose of placebo or vaccine, respectively. Both the pseudovirus and the live-virus neutralization assays showed greater resistance to the B.1.351 variant in serum samples obtained from vaccine recipients than in samples from placebo recipients. In the primary end-point analysis, mild-to-moderate Covid-19 developed in 23 of 717 placebo recipients (3.2%) and in 19 of 750 vaccine recipients (2.5%), for an efficacy of 21.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], −49.9 to 59.8). Among the 42 participants with Covid-19, 39 cases (95.1% of 41 with sequencing data) were caused by the B.1.351 variant; vaccine efficacy against this variant, analyzed as a secondary end point, was 10.4% (95% CI, −76.8 to 54.8). The incidence of serious adverse events was balanced between the vaccine and placebo groups. <p><strong>Conclusions</strong></p> A two-dose regimen of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine did not show protection against mild-to-moderate Covid-19 due to the B.1.351 variant. (Funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04444674; Pan African Clinical Trials Registry number, PACTR202006922165132.
spellingShingle Madhi, SA
Baillie, V
Cutland, CL
Voysey, M
Koen, AL
Fairlie, L
Padayachee, SD
Dheda, K
Barnabas, SL
Bhorat, QE
Briner, C
Kwatra, G
Ahmed, K
Aley, P
Bhikha, S
Bhiman, JN
Bhorat, AE
du Plessis, J
Esmail, A
Groenewald, M
Horne, E
Hwa, S-H
Jose, A
Lambe, T
Laubscher, M
Malahleha, M
Masenya, M
Masilela, M
McKenzie, S
Molapo, K
Moultrie, A
Oelofse, S
Patel, F
Pillay, S
Rhead, S
Rodel, H
Rossouw, L
Taoushanis, C
Tegally, H
Thombrayil, A
van Eck, S
Wibmer, CK
Durham, NM
Kelly, EJ
Villafana, TL
Gilbert, S
Pollard, AJ
de Oliveira, T
Moore, PL
Sigal, A
Izu, A
Efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Covid-19 vaccine against the B.1.351 variant
title Efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Covid-19 vaccine against the B.1.351 variant
title_full Efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Covid-19 vaccine against the B.1.351 variant
title_fullStr Efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Covid-19 vaccine against the B.1.351 variant
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Covid-19 vaccine against the B.1.351 variant
title_short Efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Covid-19 vaccine against the B.1.351 variant
title_sort efficacy of the chadox1 ncov 19 covid 19 vaccine against the b 1 351 variant
work_keys_str_mv AT madhisa efficacyofthechadox1ncov19covid19vaccineagainsttheb1351variant
AT bailliev efficacyofthechadox1ncov19covid19vaccineagainsttheb1351variant
AT cutlandcl efficacyofthechadox1ncov19covid19vaccineagainsttheb1351variant
AT voyseym efficacyofthechadox1ncov19covid19vaccineagainsttheb1351variant
AT koenal efficacyofthechadox1ncov19covid19vaccineagainsttheb1351variant
AT fairliel efficacyofthechadox1ncov19covid19vaccineagainsttheb1351variant
AT padayacheesd efficacyofthechadox1ncov19covid19vaccineagainsttheb1351variant
AT dhedak efficacyofthechadox1ncov19covid19vaccineagainsttheb1351variant
AT barnabassl efficacyofthechadox1ncov19covid19vaccineagainsttheb1351variant
AT bhoratqe efficacyofthechadox1ncov19covid19vaccineagainsttheb1351variant
AT brinerc efficacyofthechadox1ncov19covid19vaccineagainsttheb1351variant
AT kwatrag efficacyofthechadox1ncov19covid19vaccineagainsttheb1351variant
AT ahmedk efficacyofthechadox1ncov19covid19vaccineagainsttheb1351variant
AT aleyp efficacyofthechadox1ncov19covid19vaccineagainsttheb1351variant
AT bhikhas efficacyofthechadox1ncov19covid19vaccineagainsttheb1351variant
AT bhimanjn efficacyofthechadox1ncov19covid19vaccineagainsttheb1351variant
AT bhoratae efficacyofthechadox1ncov19covid19vaccineagainsttheb1351variant
AT duplessisj efficacyofthechadox1ncov19covid19vaccineagainsttheb1351variant
AT esmaila efficacyofthechadox1ncov19covid19vaccineagainsttheb1351variant
AT groenewaldm efficacyofthechadox1ncov19covid19vaccineagainsttheb1351variant
AT hornee efficacyofthechadox1ncov19covid19vaccineagainsttheb1351variant
AT hwash efficacyofthechadox1ncov19covid19vaccineagainsttheb1351variant
AT josea efficacyofthechadox1ncov19covid19vaccineagainsttheb1351variant
AT lambet efficacyofthechadox1ncov19covid19vaccineagainsttheb1351variant
AT laubscherm efficacyofthechadox1ncov19covid19vaccineagainsttheb1351variant
AT malahleham efficacyofthechadox1ncov19covid19vaccineagainsttheb1351variant
AT masenyam efficacyofthechadox1ncov19covid19vaccineagainsttheb1351variant
AT masilelam efficacyofthechadox1ncov19covid19vaccineagainsttheb1351variant
AT mckenzies efficacyofthechadox1ncov19covid19vaccineagainsttheb1351variant
AT molapok efficacyofthechadox1ncov19covid19vaccineagainsttheb1351variant
AT moultriea efficacyofthechadox1ncov19covid19vaccineagainsttheb1351variant
AT oelofses efficacyofthechadox1ncov19covid19vaccineagainsttheb1351variant
AT patelf efficacyofthechadox1ncov19covid19vaccineagainsttheb1351variant
AT pillays efficacyofthechadox1ncov19covid19vaccineagainsttheb1351variant
AT rheads efficacyofthechadox1ncov19covid19vaccineagainsttheb1351variant
AT rodelh efficacyofthechadox1ncov19covid19vaccineagainsttheb1351variant
AT rossouwl efficacyofthechadox1ncov19covid19vaccineagainsttheb1351variant
AT taoushanisc efficacyofthechadox1ncov19covid19vaccineagainsttheb1351variant
AT tegallyh efficacyofthechadox1ncov19covid19vaccineagainsttheb1351variant
AT thombrayila efficacyofthechadox1ncov19covid19vaccineagainsttheb1351variant
AT vanecks efficacyofthechadox1ncov19covid19vaccineagainsttheb1351variant
AT wibmerck efficacyofthechadox1ncov19covid19vaccineagainsttheb1351variant
AT durhamnm efficacyofthechadox1ncov19covid19vaccineagainsttheb1351variant
AT kellyej efficacyofthechadox1ncov19covid19vaccineagainsttheb1351variant
AT villafanatl efficacyofthechadox1ncov19covid19vaccineagainsttheb1351variant
AT gilberts efficacyofthechadox1ncov19covid19vaccineagainsttheb1351variant
AT pollardaj efficacyofthechadox1ncov19covid19vaccineagainsttheb1351variant
AT deoliveirat efficacyofthechadox1ncov19covid19vaccineagainsttheb1351variant
AT moorepl efficacyofthechadox1ncov19covid19vaccineagainsttheb1351variant
AT sigala efficacyofthechadox1ncov19covid19vaccineagainsttheb1351variant
AT izua efficacyofthechadox1ncov19covid19vaccineagainsttheb1351variant