Evaluating rules for aggregating satisfaction with activity-travel episodes to a day-level satisfaction measure

The recent interest in developing subjective wellbeing aggregation rules in transport research has triggered dialogue across disciplines. Here we analyze how 10 different aggregation rules result in different day-level indicators of satisfaction based on separate measures for each activity and trip...

Olles dieđut

Bibliográfalaš dieđut
Váldodahkkit: Guo, W, Schwanen, T, Brand, C, Chai, Y
Materiálatiipa: Journal article
Giella:English
Almmustuhtton: Transport Findings 2022
_version_ 1826308948628602880
author Guo, W
Schwanen, T
Brand, C
Chai, Y
author_facet Guo, W
Schwanen, T
Brand, C
Chai, Y
author_sort Guo, W
collection OXFORD
description The recent interest in developing subjective wellbeing aggregation rules in transport research has triggered dialogue across disciplines. Here we analyze how 10 different aggregation rules result in different day-level indicators of satisfaction based on separate measures for each activity and trip on the day and compare the resulting distribution of day-level scores with those for life satisfaction. We find that the normative rules outperform the heuristic rules and are best used to create day-level indicators of satisfaction with activities and trips if the aim is to mimic the statistical distribution for life satisfaction scores.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T07:26:56Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:23069a6c-593b-44b1-bc64-4f6df3dc1c2e
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T07:26:56Z
publishDate 2022
publisher Transport Findings
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:23069a6c-593b-44b1-bc64-4f6df3dc1c2e2022-12-05T15:21:41ZEvaluating rules for aggregating satisfaction with activity-travel episodes to a day-level satisfaction measureJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:23069a6c-593b-44b1-bc64-4f6df3dc1c2eEnglishSymplectic ElementsTransport Findings2022Guo, WSchwanen, TBrand, CChai, YThe recent interest in developing subjective wellbeing aggregation rules in transport research has triggered dialogue across disciplines. Here we analyze how 10 different aggregation rules result in different day-level indicators of satisfaction based on separate measures for each activity and trip on the day and compare the resulting distribution of day-level scores with those for life satisfaction. We find that the normative rules outperform the heuristic rules and are best used to create day-level indicators of satisfaction with activities and trips if the aim is to mimic the statistical distribution for life satisfaction scores.
spellingShingle Guo, W
Schwanen, T
Brand, C
Chai, Y
Evaluating rules for aggregating satisfaction with activity-travel episodes to a day-level satisfaction measure
title Evaluating rules for aggregating satisfaction with activity-travel episodes to a day-level satisfaction measure
title_full Evaluating rules for aggregating satisfaction with activity-travel episodes to a day-level satisfaction measure
title_fullStr Evaluating rules for aggregating satisfaction with activity-travel episodes to a day-level satisfaction measure
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating rules for aggregating satisfaction with activity-travel episodes to a day-level satisfaction measure
title_short Evaluating rules for aggregating satisfaction with activity-travel episodes to a day-level satisfaction measure
title_sort evaluating rules for aggregating satisfaction with activity travel episodes to a day level satisfaction measure
work_keys_str_mv AT guow evaluatingrulesforaggregatingsatisfactionwithactivitytravelepisodestoadaylevelsatisfactionmeasure
AT schwanent evaluatingrulesforaggregatingsatisfactionwithactivitytravelepisodestoadaylevelsatisfactionmeasure
AT brandc evaluatingrulesforaggregatingsatisfactionwithactivitytravelepisodestoadaylevelsatisfactionmeasure
AT chaiy evaluatingrulesforaggregatingsatisfactionwithactivitytravelepisodestoadaylevelsatisfactionmeasure