Interventions to improve district-level routine health data in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review

<p><strong>Background:</strong> Routine health information system(s) (RHIS) facilitate the collection of health data at all levels of the health system allowing estimates of disease prevalence, treatment and preventive intervention coverage, and risk factors to guide disease contro...

Deskribapen osoa

Xehetasun bibliografikoak
Egile Nagusiak: Lee, J, Lynch, CA, Hashiguchi, LO, Snow, RW, Herz, ND, Webster, J, Parkhurst, J, Erondu, NA
Formatua: Journal article
Hizkuntza:English
Argitaratua: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
_version_ 1826263231908282368
author Lee, J
Lynch, CA
Hashiguchi, LO
Snow, RW
Herz, ND
Webster, J
Parkhurst, J
Erondu, NA
author_facet Lee, J
Lynch, CA
Hashiguchi, LO
Snow, RW
Herz, ND
Webster, J
Parkhurst, J
Erondu, NA
author_sort Lee, J
collection OXFORD
description <p><strong>Background:</strong> Routine health information system(s) (RHIS) facilitate the collection of health data at all levels of the health system allowing estimates of disease prevalence, treatment and preventive intervention coverage, and risk factors to guide disease control strategies. This core health system pillar remains underdeveloped in many low-income and middle-income countries. Efforts to improve RHIS data coverage, quality and timeliness were launched over 10 years ago.</p> <p><strong>Methods:</strong> A systematic review was performed across 12 databases and literature search engines for both peer-reviewed articles and grey literature reports on RHIS interventions. Studies were analysed in three stages: (1) categorisation of RHIS intervention components and processes; (2) comparison of intervention component effectiveness and (3) whether the post-intervention outcome improved above the WHO integrated disease surveillance response framework data quality standard of 80% or above.</p> <p><strong>Results:</strong> 5294 references were screened, resulting in 56 studies. Three key performance determinants—technical, organisational and behavioural—were proposed as critical to RHIS strengthening. Seventy-seven per cent [77%] of studies identified addressed all three determinants. The most frequently implemented intervention components were ‘providing training’ and ‘using an electronic health management information systems’. Ninety-three per cent [93%] of pre–post or controlled trial studies showed improvements in one or more data quality outputs, but after applying a standard threshold of >80% post-intervention, this number reduced to 68%. There was an observed benefit of multi-component interventions that either conducted data quality training or that addressed improvement across multiple processes and determinants of RHIS.</p> ,p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> Holistic data quality interventions that address multiple determinants should be continuously practised for strengthening RHIS. Studies with clearly defined and pragmatic outcomes are required for future RHIS improvement interventions. These should be accompanied by qualitative studies and cost analyses to understand which investments are needed to sustain high-quality RHIS in low-income and middle-income countries.</p>
first_indexed 2024-03-06T19:48:26Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:2324f35c-e6f1-41de-a2e8-1f75eee220a1
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T19:48:26Z
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:2324f35c-e6f1-41de-a2e8-1f75eee220a12022-03-26T11:42:37ZInterventions to improve district-level routine health data in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic reviewJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:2324f35c-e6f1-41de-a2e8-1f75eee220a1EnglishSymplectic ElementsBMJ Publishing Group2021Lee, JLynch, CAHashiguchi, LOSnow, RWHerz, NDWebster, JParkhurst, JErondu, NA<p><strong>Background:</strong> Routine health information system(s) (RHIS) facilitate the collection of health data at all levels of the health system allowing estimates of disease prevalence, treatment and preventive intervention coverage, and risk factors to guide disease control strategies. This core health system pillar remains underdeveloped in many low-income and middle-income countries. Efforts to improve RHIS data coverage, quality and timeliness were launched over 10 years ago.</p> <p><strong>Methods:</strong> A systematic review was performed across 12 databases and literature search engines for both peer-reviewed articles and grey literature reports on RHIS interventions. Studies were analysed in three stages: (1) categorisation of RHIS intervention components and processes; (2) comparison of intervention component effectiveness and (3) whether the post-intervention outcome improved above the WHO integrated disease surveillance response framework data quality standard of 80% or above.</p> <p><strong>Results:</strong> 5294 references were screened, resulting in 56 studies. Three key performance determinants—technical, organisational and behavioural—were proposed as critical to RHIS strengthening. Seventy-seven per cent [77%] of studies identified addressed all three determinants. The most frequently implemented intervention components were ‘providing training’ and ‘using an electronic health management information systems’. Ninety-three per cent [93%] of pre–post or controlled trial studies showed improvements in one or more data quality outputs, but after applying a standard threshold of >80% post-intervention, this number reduced to 68%. There was an observed benefit of multi-component interventions that either conducted data quality training or that addressed improvement across multiple processes and determinants of RHIS.</p> ,p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> Holistic data quality interventions that address multiple determinants should be continuously practised for strengthening RHIS. Studies with clearly defined and pragmatic outcomes are required for future RHIS improvement interventions. These should be accompanied by qualitative studies and cost analyses to understand which investments are needed to sustain high-quality RHIS in low-income and middle-income countries.</p>
spellingShingle Lee, J
Lynch, CA
Hashiguchi, LO
Snow, RW
Herz, ND
Webster, J
Parkhurst, J
Erondu, NA
Interventions to improve district-level routine health data in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review
title Interventions to improve district-level routine health data in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review
title_full Interventions to improve district-level routine health data in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review
title_fullStr Interventions to improve district-level routine health data in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Interventions to improve district-level routine health data in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review
title_short Interventions to improve district-level routine health data in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review
title_sort interventions to improve district level routine health data in low income and middle income countries a systematic review
work_keys_str_mv AT leej interventionstoimprovedistrictlevelroutinehealthdatainlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreview
AT lynchca interventionstoimprovedistrictlevelroutinehealthdatainlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreview
AT hashiguchilo interventionstoimprovedistrictlevelroutinehealthdatainlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreview
AT snowrw interventionstoimprovedistrictlevelroutinehealthdatainlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreview
AT herznd interventionstoimprovedistrictlevelroutinehealthdatainlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreview
AT websterj interventionstoimprovedistrictlevelroutinehealthdatainlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreview
AT parkhurstj interventionstoimprovedistrictlevelroutinehealthdatainlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreview
AT eronduna interventionstoimprovedistrictlevelroutinehealthdatainlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreview