Surgical site infection rate is lower in laparoscopic than open colorectal surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Few studies have investigated whether surgical site infection (SSI) incidence differs between laparoscopic colorectal surgery (LCS) and open colorectal surgery (OCS). This study investigated the SSI incidence using the validated UK SSI Surveillance Service (SSISS) criteria for diagnosing...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Howard, D, Datta, G, Cunnick, G, Gatzen, C, Huang, A
Format: Journal article
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2010
_version_ 1826263596122767360
author Howard, D
Datta, G
Cunnick, G
Gatzen, C
Huang, A
author_facet Howard, D
Datta, G
Cunnick, G
Gatzen, C
Huang, A
author_sort Howard, D
collection OXFORD
description OBJECTIVE: Few studies have investigated whether surgical site infection (SSI) incidence differs between laparoscopic colorectal surgery (LCS) and open colorectal surgery (OCS). This study investigated the SSI incidence using the validated UK SSI Surveillance Service (SSISS) criteria for diagnosing wound infections. METHOD: Prospective data collection recorded patients' demographics, operative details, antibiotic use, wound evaluation and microbiological wound culture results, for consecutive patients undergoing elective resectional LCS and OCS. Postdischarge surveillance consisted of patient questionnaires sent out at 30 days and the primary care communication. RESULTS: A total of 122 patients underwent colorectal resections over 1 year (LCS 43; OCS 79). Patients' demographics and operative case-mix were similar for both groups, including body mass index (BMI), diabetic and smoking status. Operative duration was longer in the LCS group compared with OCS group (P = 0.012, Mann-Whitney U-test), but hospital stay was shorter for LCS (P = 0.0001, Mann-Whitney U-test). The SSI rate was significantly lower in the LCS than OCS group (7%vs 25% respectively; P = 0.015, two-tailed Fisher's exact test). BMI > 30 and operation length > 4 h influenced the risk of SSI formation (P < 0.05, chi-squared test). One LCS patient required conversion to a limited laparotomy. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical site infection incidence is significantly lower following LCS when compared with OCS. Confounding factors in this study include patient selection for LCS and nonrandomization.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T19:54:18Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:25076195-dfe8-49ea-afa1-89193af8ed5c
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T19:54:18Z
publishDate 2010
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:25076195-dfe8-49ea-afa1-89193af8ed5c2022-03-26T11:53:28ZSurgical site infection rate is lower in laparoscopic than open colorectal surgery.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:25076195-dfe8-49ea-afa1-89193af8ed5cEnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2010Howard, DDatta, GCunnick, GGatzen, CHuang, A OBJECTIVE: Few studies have investigated whether surgical site infection (SSI) incidence differs between laparoscopic colorectal surgery (LCS) and open colorectal surgery (OCS). This study investigated the SSI incidence using the validated UK SSI Surveillance Service (SSISS) criteria for diagnosing wound infections. METHOD: Prospective data collection recorded patients' demographics, operative details, antibiotic use, wound evaluation and microbiological wound culture results, for consecutive patients undergoing elective resectional LCS and OCS. Postdischarge surveillance consisted of patient questionnaires sent out at 30 days and the primary care communication. RESULTS: A total of 122 patients underwent colorectal resections over 1 year (LCS 43; OCS 79). Patients' demographics and operative case-mix were similar for both groups, including body mass index (BMI), diabetic and smoking status. Operative duration was longer in the LCS group compared with OCS group (P = 0.012, Mann-Whitney U-test), but hospital stay was shorter for LCS (P = 0.0001, Mann-Whitney U-test). The SSI rate was significantly lower in the LCS than OCS group (7%vs 25% respectively; P = 0.015, two-tailed Fisher's exact test). BMI > 30 and operation length > 4 h influenced the risk of SSI formation (P < 0.05, chi-squared test). One LCS patient required conversion to a limited laparotomy. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical site infection incidence is significantly lower following LCS when compared with OCS. Confounding factors in this study include patient selection for LCS and nonrandomization.
spellingShingle Howard, D
Datta, G
Cunnick, G
Gatzen, C
Huang, A
Surgical site infection rate is lower in laparoscopic than open colorectal surgery.
title Surgical site infection rate is lower in laparoscopic than open colorectal surgery.
title_full Surgical site infection rate is lower in laparoscopic than open colorectal surgery.
title_fullStr Surgical site infection rate is lower in laparoscopic than open colorectal surgery.
title_full_unstemmed Surgical site infection rate is lower in laparoscopic than open colorectal surgery.
title_short Surgical site infection rate is lower in laparoscopic than open colorectal surgery.
title_sort surgical site infection rate is lower in laparoscopic than open colorectal surgery
work_keys_str_mv AT howardd surgicalsiteinfectionrateislowerinlaparoscopicthanopencolorectalsurgery
AT dattag surgicalsiteinfectionrateislowerinlaparoscopicthanopencolorectalsurgery
AT cunnickg surgicalsiteinfectionrateislowerinlaparoscopicthanopencolorectalsurgery
AT gatzenc surgicalsiteinfectionrateislowerinlaparoscopicthanopencolorectalsurgery
AT huanga surgicalsiteinfectionrateislowerinlaparoscopicthanopencolorectalsurgery