Neuroethics and psychiatry.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The field of neuroethics is experiencing a great deal of activity at present, as researchers come to realize the potentially dramatic implications of new work in neuroscience and its applications. This review aims to describe some of the work of direct relevance to psychiatric et...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Levy, N, Clarke, S
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 2008
_version_ 1797058856218525696
author Levy, N
Clarke, S
author_facet Levy, N
Clarke, S
author_sort Levy, N
collection OXFORD
description PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The field of neuroethics is experiencing a great deal of activity at present, as researchers come to realize the potentially dramatic implications of new work in neuroscience and its applications. This review aims to describe some of the work of direct relevance to psychiatric ethics. RECENT FINDINGS: The review focuses on ethical issues surrounding the use of propranolol to treat or prevent posttraumatic stress disorder, issues concerning the capacity of the mentally ill to give informed consent to medical treatment and the potential social implications of cognitive enhancers and other interventions into the mind. SUMMARY: It is argued that psychiatric ethics would benefit from a consideration of cognate questions arising in neuroethics; in particular, neuroethics has the potential to remind psychiatrists that individual treatment decisions can have broad social implications.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T19:56:16Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:25b40e59-510a-406c-b6f2-4d27eeac5882
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T19:56:16Z
publishDate 2008
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:25b40e59-510a-406c-b6f2-4d27eeac58822022-03-26T11:57:00ZNeuroethics and psychiatry.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:25b40e59-510a-406c-b6f2-4d27eeac5882EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2008Levy, NClarke, S PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The field of neuroethics is experiencing a great deal of activity at present, as researchers come to realize the potentially dramatic implications of new work in neuroscience and its applications. This review aims to describe some of the work of direct relevance to psychiatric ethics. RECENT FINDINGS: The review focuses on ethical issues surrounding the use of propranolol to treat or prevent posttraumatic stress disorder, issues concerning the capacity of the mentally ill to give informed consent to medical treatment and the potential social implications of cognitive enhancers and other interventions into the mind. SUMMARY: It is argued that psychiatric ethics would benefit from a consideration of cognate questions arising in neuroethics; in particular, neuroethics has the potential to remind psychiatrists that individual treatment decisions can have broad social implications.
spellingShingle Levy, N
Clarke, S
Neuroethics and psychiatry.
title Neuroethics and psychiatry.
title_full Neuroethics and psychiatry.
title_fullStr Neuroethics and psychiatry.
title_full_unstemmed Neuroethics and psychiatry.
title_short Neuroethics and psychiatry.
title_sort neuroethics and psychiatry
work_keys_str_mv AT levyn neuroethicsandpsychiatry
AT clarkes neuroethicsandpsychiatry