STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: Explanation and elaboration
Diagnostic accuracy studies are, like other clinical studies, at risk of bias due to shortcomings in design and conduct, and the results of a diagnostic accuracy study may not apply to other patient groups and settings. Readers of study reports need to be informed about study design and conduct, in...
| Hoofdauteurs: | , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formaat: | Journal article |
| Gepubliceerd in: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2016
|
| _version_ | 1826263728185671680 |
|---|---|
| author | Cohen, J Korevaar, D Altman, D Bruns, D Gatsonis, C Hooft, L Irwig, L Levine, D Reitsma, J De Vet, H Bossuyt, P |
| author_facet | Cohen, J Korevaar, D Altman, D Bruns, D Gatsonis, C Hooft, L Irwig, L Levine, D Reitsma, J De Vet, H Bossuyt, P |
| author_sort | Cohen, J |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | Diagnostic accuracy studies are, like other clinical studies, at risk of bias due to shortcomings in design and conduct, and the results of a diagnostic accuracy study may not apply to other patient groups and settings. Readers of study reports need to be informed about study design and conduct, in sufficient detail to judge the trustworthiness and applicability of the study findings. The STARD statement (Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies) was developed to improve the completeness and transparency of reports of diagnostic accuracy studies. STARD contains a list of essential items that can be used as a checklist, by authors, reviewers and other readers, to ensure that a report of a diagnostic accuracy study contains the necessary information. STARD was recently updated. All updated STARD materials, including the checklist, are available at http://www.equator-network.org/reporting-guidelines/stard. Here, we present the STARD 2015 explanation and elaboration document. Through commented examples of appropriate reporting, we clarify the rationale for each of the 30 items on the STARD 2015 checklist, and describe what is expected from authors in developing sufficiently informative study reports. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-06T19:56:25Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:25c2041c-f931-4b98-bfcf-3c22a3bd1891 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-06T19:56:25Z |
| publishDate | 2016 |
| publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:25c2041c-f931-4b98-bfcf-3c22a3bd18912022-03-26T11:57:18ZSTARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: Explanation and elaborationJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:25c2041c-f931-4b98-bfcf-3c22a3bd1891Symplectic Elements at OxfordBMJ Publishing Group2016Cohen, JKorevaar, DAltman, DBruns, DGatsonis, CHooft, LIrwig, LLevine, DReitsma, JDe Vet, HBossuyt, PDiagnostic accuracy studies are, like other clinical studies, at risk of bias due to shortcomings in design and conduct, and the results of a diagnostic accuracy study may not apply to other patient groups and settings. Readers of study reports need to be informed about study design and conduct, in sufficient detail to judge the trustworthiness and applicability of the study findings. The STARD statement (Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies) was developed to improve the completeness and transparency of reports of diagnostic accuracy studies. STARD contains a list of essential items that can be used as a checklist, by authors, reviewers and other readers, to ensure that a report of a diagnostic accuracy study contains the necessary information. STARD was recently updated. All updated STARD materials, including the checklist, are available at http://www.equator-network.org/reporting-guidelines/stard. Here, we present the STARD 2015 explanation and elaboration document. Through commented examples of appropriate reporting, we clarify the rationale for each of the 30 items on the STARD 2015 checklist, and describe what is expected from authors in developing sufficiently informative study reports. |
| spellingShingle | Cohen, J Korevaar, D Altman, D Bruns, D Gatsonis, C Hooft, L Irwig, L Levine, D Reitsma, J De Vet, H Bossuyt, P STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: Explanation and elaboration |
| title | STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: Explanation and elaboration |
| title_full | STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: Explanation and elaboration |
| title_fullStr | STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: Explanation and elaboration |
| title_full_unstemmed | STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: Explanation and elaboration |
| title_short | STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: Explanation and elaboration |
| title_sort | stard 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies explanation and elaboration |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT cohenj stard2015guidelinesforreportingdiagnosticaccuracystudiesexplanationandelaboration AT korevaard stard2015guidelinesforreportingdiagnosticaccuracystudiesexplanationandelaboration AT altmand stard2015guidelinesforreportingdiagnosticaccuracystudiesexplanationandelaboration AT brunsd stard2015guidelinesforreportingdiagnosticaccuracystudiesexplanationandelaboration AT gatsonisc stard2015guidelinesforreportingdiagnosticaccuracystudiesexplanationandelaboration AT hooftl stard2015guidelinesforreportingdiagnosticaccuracystudiesexplanationandelaboration AT irwigl stard2015guidelinesforreportingdiagnosticaccuracystudiesexplanationandelaboration AT levined stard2015guidelinesforreportingdiagnosticaccuracystudiesexplanationandelaboration AT reitsmaj stard2015guidelinesforreportingdiagnosticaccuracystudiesexplanationandelaboration AT deveth stard2015guidelinesforreportingdiagnosticaccuracystudiesexplanationandelaboration AT bossuytp stard2015guidelinesforreportingdiagnosticaccuracystudiesexplanationandelaboration |