STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: Explanation and elaboration

Diagnostic accuracy studies are, like other clinical studies, at risk of bias due to shortcomings in design and conduct, and the results of a diagnostic accuracy study may not apply to other patient groups and settings. Readers of study reports need to be informed about study design and conduct, in...

Deskribapen osoa

Xehetasun bibliografikoak
Egile Nagusiak: Cohen, J, Korevaar, D, Altman, D, Bruns, D, Gatsonis, C, Hooft, L, Irwig, L, Levine, D, Reitsma, J, De Vet, H, Bossuyt, P
Formatua: Journal article
Argitaratua: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
_version_ 1826263728185671680
author Cohen, J
Korevaar, D
Altman, D
Bruns, D
Gatsonis, C
Hooft, L
Irwig, L
Levine, D
Reitsma, J
De Vet, H
Bossuyt, P
author_facet Cohen, J
Korevaar, D
Altman, D
Bruns, D
Gatsonis, C
Hooft, L
Irwig, L
Levine, D
Reitsma, J
De Vet, H
Bossuyt, P
author_sort Cohen, J
collection OXFORD
description Diagnostic accuracy studies are, like other clinical studies, at risk of bias due to shortcomings in design and conduct, and the results of a diagnostic accuracy study may not apply to other patient groups and settings. Readers of study reports need to be informed about study design and conduct, in sufficient detail to judge the trustworthiness and applicability of the study findings. The STARD statement (Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies) was developed to improve the completeness and transparency of reports of diagnostic accuracy studies. STARD contains a list of essential items that can be used as a checklist, by authors, reviewers and other readers, to ensure that a report of a diagnostic accuracy study contains the necessary information. STARD was recently updated. All updated STARD materials, including the checklist, are available at http://www.equator-network.org/reporting-guidelines/stard. Here, we present the STARD 2015 explanation and elaboration document. Through commented examples of appropriate reporting, we clarify the rationale for each of the 30 items on the STARD 2015 checklist, and describe what is expected from authors in developing sufficiently informative study reports.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T19:56:25Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:25c2041c-f931-4b98-bfcf-3c22a3bd1891
institution University of Oxford
last_indexed 2024-03-06T19:56:25Z
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:25c2041c-f931-4b98-bfcf-3c22a3bd18912022-03-26T11:57:18ZSTARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: Explanation and elaborationJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:25c2041c-f931-4b98-bfcf-3c22a3bd1891Symplectic Elements at OxfordBMJ Publishing Group2016Cohen, JKorevaar, DAltman, DBruns, DGatsonis, CHooft, LIrwig, LLevine, DReitsma, JDe Vet, HBossuyt, PDiagnostic accuracy studies are, like other clinical studies, at risk of bias due to shortcomings in design and conduct, and the results of a diagnostic accuracy study may not apply to other patient groups and settings. Readers of study reports need to be informed about study design and conduct, in sufficient detail to judge the trustworthiness and applicability of the study findings. The STARD statement (Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies) was developed to improve the completeness and transparency of reports of diagnostic accuracy studies. STARD contains a list of essential items that can be used as a checklist, by authors, reviewers and other readers, to ensure that a report of a diagnostic accuracy study contains the necessary information. STARD was recently updated. All updated STARD materials, including the checklist, are available at http://www.equator-network.org/reporting-guidelines/stard. Here, we present the STARD 2015 explanation and elaboration document. Through commented examples of appropriate reporting, we clarify the rationale for each of the 30 items on the STARD 2015 checklist, and describe what is expected from authors in developing sufficiently informative study reports.
spellingShingle Cohen, J
Korevaar, D
Altman, D
Bruns, D
Gatsonis, C
Hooft, L
Irwig, L
Levine, D
Reitsma, J
De Vet, H
Bossuyt, P
STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: Explanation and elaboration
title STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: Explanation and elaboration
title_full STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: Explanation and elaboration
title_fullStr STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: Explanation and elaboration
title_full_unstemmed STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: Explanation and elaboration
title_short STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: Explanation and elaboration
title_sort stard 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies explanation and elaboration
work_keys_str_mv AT cohenj stard2015guidelinesforreportingdiagnosticaccuracystudiesexplanationandelaboration
AT korevaard stard2015guidelinesforreportingdiagnosticaccuracystudiesexplanationandelaboration
AT altmand stard2015guidelinesforreportingdiagnosticaccuracystudiesexplanationandelaboration
AT brunsd stard2015guidelinesforreportingdiagnosticaccuracystudiesexplanationandelaboration
AT gatsonisc stard2015guidelinesforreportingdiagnosticaccuracystudiesexplanationandelaboration
AT hooftl stard2015guidelinesforreportingdiagnosticaccuracystudiesexplanationandelaboration
AT irwigl stard2015guidelinesforreportingdiagnosticaccuracystudiesexplanationandelaboration
AT levined stard2015guidelinesforreportingdiagnosticaccuracystudiesexplanationandelaboration
AT reitsmaj stard2015guidelinesforreportingdiagnosticaccuracystudiesexplanationandelaboration
AT deveth stard2015guidelinesforreportingdiagnosticaccuracystudiesexplanationandelaboration
AT bossuytp stard2015guidelinesforreportingdiagnosticaccuracystudiesexplanationandelaboration