Lean participative process improvement: outcomes and obstacles in trauma orthopaedics

OBJECTIVES: To examine the effectiveness of a "systems" approach using Lean methodology to improve surgical care, as part of a programme of studies investigating possible synergy between improvement approaches. SETTING: A controlled before-after study using the orthopaedic trauma theatre o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: New, S, Hadi, M, Pickering, S, Robertson, E, Morgan, L, Griffin, D, Collins, G, Rivero-Arias, O, Catchpole, K, McCulloch, P
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science 2016
_version_ 1797058926901985280
author New, S
Hadi, M
Pickering, S
Robertson, E
Morgan, L
Griffin, D
Collins, G
Rivero-Arias, O
Catchpole, K
McCulloch, P
author_facet New, S
Hadi, M
Pickering, S
Robertson, E
Morgan, L
Griffin, D
Collins, G
Rivero-Arias, O
Catchpole, K
McCulloch, P
author_sort New, S
collection OXFORD
description OBJECTIVES: To examine the effectiveness of a "systems" approach using Lean methodology to improve surgical care, as part of a programme of studies investigating possible synergy between improvement approaches. SETTING: A controlled before-after study using the orthopaedic trauma theatre of a UK Trust hospital as the active site and an elective orthopaedic theatre in the same Trust as control. PARTICIPANTS: All staff involved in surgical procedures in both theatres. INTERVENTIONS: A one-day "lean" training course delivered by an experienced specialist team was followed by support and assistance in developing a 6 month improvement project. Clinical staff selected the subjects for improvement and designed the improvements. OUTCOME MEASURES: We compared technical and non-technical team performance in theatre using WHO checklist compliance evaluation, "glitch count" and Oxford NOTECHS II in a sample of directly observed operations, and patient outcome (length of stay, complications and readmissions) for all patients. We collected observational data for 3 months and clinical data for 6 months before and after the intervention period. We compared changes in measures using 2-way analysis of variance. RESULTS: We studied 576 cases before and 465 after intervention, observing the operation in 38 and 41 cases respectively. We found no significant changes in team performance or patient outcome measures. The intervention theatre staff focused their efforts on improving first patient arrival time, which improved by 20 minutes after intervention. CONCLUSIONS: This version of "lean" system improvement did not improve measured safety processes or outcomes. The study highlighted an important tension between promoting staff ownership and providing direction, which needs to be managed in "lean" projects. Space and time for staff to conduct improvement activities are important for success.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T19:56:58Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:25f18fb8-3ab1-4ee3-bc59-c53d12bf73ef
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T19:56:58Z
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:25f18fb8-3ab1-4ee3-bc59-c53d12bf73ef2022-03-26T11:58:18ZLean participative process improvement: outcomes and obstacles in trauma orthopaedicsJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:25f18fb8-3ab1-4ee3-bc59-c53d12bf73efEnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordPublic Library of Science2016New, SHadi, MPickering, SRobertson, EMorgan, LGriffin, DCollins, GRivero-Arias, OCatchpole, KMcCulloch, POBJECTIVES: To examine the effectiveness of a "systems" approach using Lean methodology to improve surgical care, as part of a programme of studies investigating possible synergy between improvement approaches. SETTING: A controlled before-after study using the orthopaedic trauma theatre of a UK Trust hospital as the active site and an elective orthopaedic theatre in the same Trust as control. PARTICIPANTS: All staff involved in surgical procedures in both theatres. INTERVENTIONS: A one-day "lean" training course delivered by an experienced specialist team was followed by support and assistance in developing a 6 month improvement project. Clinical staff selected the subjects for improvement and designed the improvements. OUTCOME MEASURES: We compared technical and non-technical team performance in theatre using WHO checklist compliance evaluation, "glitch count" and Oxford NOTECHS II in a sample of directly observed operations, and patient outcome (length of stay, complications and readmissions) for all patients. We collected observational data for 3 months and clinical data for 6 months before and after the intervention period. We compared changes in measures using 2-way analysis of variance. RESULTS: We studied 576 cases before and 465 after intervention, observing the operation in 38 and 41 cases respectively. We found no significant changes in team performance or patient outcome measures. The intervention theatre staff focused their efforts on improving first patient arrival time, which improved by 20 minutes after intervention. CONCLUSIONS: This version of "lean" system improvement did not improve measured safety processes or outcomes. The study highlighted an important tension between promoting staff ownership and providing direction, which needs to be managed in "lean" projects. Space and time for staff to conduct improvement activities are important for success.
spellingShingle New, S
Hadi, M
Pickering, S
Robertson, E
Morgan, L
Griffin, D
Collins, G
Rivero-Arias, O
Catchpole, K
McCulloch, P
Lean participative process improvement: outcomes and obstacles in trauma orthopaedics
title Lean participative process improvement: outcomes and obstacles in trauma orthopaedics
title_full Lean participative process improvement: outcomes and obstacles in trauma orthopaedics
title_fullStr Lean participative process improvement: outcomes and obstacles in trauma orthopaedics
title_full_unstemmed Lean participative process improvement: outcomes and obstacles in trauma orthopaedics
title_short Lean participative process improvement: outcomes and obstacles in trauma orthopaedics
title_sort lean participative process improvement outcomes and obstacles in trauma orthopaedics
work_keys_str_mv AT news leanparticipativeprocessimprovementoutcomesandobstaclesintraumaorthopaedics
AT hadim leanparticipativeprocessimprovementoutcomesandobstaclesintraumaorthopaedics
AT pickerings leanparticipativeprocessimprovementoutcomesandobstaclesintraumaorthopaedics
AT robertsone leanparticipativeprocessimprovementoutcomesandobstaclesintraumaorthopaedics
AT morganl leanparticipativeprocessimprovementoutcomesandobstaclesintraumaorthopaedics
AT griffind leanparticipativeprocessimprovementoutcomesandobstaclesintraumaorthopaedics
AT collinsg leanparticipativeprocessimprovementoutcomesandobstaclesintraumaorthopaedics
AT riveroariaso leanparticipativeprocessimprovementoutcomesandobstaclesintraumaorthopaedics
AT catchpolek leanparticipativeprocessimprovementoutcomesandobstaclesintraumaorthopaedics
AT mccullochp leanparticipativeprocessimprovementoutcomesandobstaclesintraumaorthopaedics