The nature of tremor circuits in parkinsonian and essential tremor.

Tremor is a cardinal feature of Parkinson's disease and essential tremor, the two most common movement disorders. Yet, the mechanisms underlying tremor generation remain largely unknown. We hypothesized that driving deep brain stimulation electrodes at a frequency closely matching the patient&#...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cagnan, H, Little, S, Foltynie, T, Limousin, P, Zrinzo, L, Hariz, M, Cheeran, B, Fitzgerald, J, Green, A, Aziz, T, Brown, P
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Oxford University Press 2014
_version_ 1826263804098379776
author Cagnan, H
Little, S
Foltynie, T
Limousin, P
Zrinzo, L
Hariz, M
Cheeran, B
Fitzgerald, J
Green, A
Aziz, T
Brown, P
author_facet Cagnan, H
Little, S
Foltynie, T
Limousin, P
Zrinzo, L
Hariz, M
Cheeran, B
Fitzgerald, J
Green, A
Aziz, T
Brown, P
author_sort Cagnan, H
collection OXFORD
description Tremor is a cardinal feature of Parkinson's disease and essential tremor, the two most common movement disorders. Yet, the mechanisms underlying tremor generation remain largely unknown. We hypothesized that driving deep brain stimulation electrodes at a frequency closely matching the patient's own tremor frequency should interact with neural activity responsible for tremor, and that the effect of stimulation on tremor should reveal the role of different deep brain stimulation targets in tremor generation. Moreover, tremor responses to stimulation might reveal pathophysiological differences between parkinsonian and essential tremor circuits. Accordingly, we stimulated 15 patients with Parkinson's disease with either thalamic or subthalamic electrodes (13 male and two female patients, age: 50-77 years) and 10 patients with essential tremor with thalamic electrodes (nine male and one female patients, age: 34-74 years). Stimulation at near-to tremor frequency entrained tremor in all three patient groups (ventrolateral thalamic stimulation in Parkinson's disease, P=0.0078, subthalamic stimulation in Parkinson's disease, P=0.0312; ventrolateral thalamic stimulation in essential tremor, P=0.0137; two-tailed paired Wilcoxon signed-rank tests). However, only ventrolateral thalamic stimulation in essential tremor modulated postural tremor amplitude according to the timing of stimulation pulses with respect to the tremor cycle (e.g. P=0.0002 for tremor amplification, two-tailed Wilcoxon rank sum test). Parkinsonian rest and essential postural tremor severity (i.e. tremor amplitude) differed in their relative tolerance to spontaneous changes in tremor frequency when stimulation was not applied. Specifically, the amplitude of parkinsonian rest tremor remained unchanged despite spontaneous changes in tremor frequency, whereas that of essential postural tremor reduced when tremor frequency departed from median values. Based on these results we conclude that parkinsonian rest tremor is driven by a neural network, which includes the subthalamic nucleus and ventrolateral thalamus and has broad frequency-amplitude tolerance. We propose that it is this tolerance to changes in tremor frequency that dictates that parkinsonian rest tremor may be significantly entrained by low frequency stimulation without stimulation timing-dependent amplitude modulation. In contrast, the circuit influenced by low frequency thalamic stimulation in essential tremor has a narrower frequency-amplitude tolerance so that tremor entrainment through extrinsic driving is necessarily accompanied by amplitude modulation. Such differences in parkinsonian rest and essential tremor will be important in selecting future strategies for closed loop deep brain stimulation for tremor control.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T19:57:40Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:263373d3-4308-4c23-8e80-d6490a338cef
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T19:57:40Z
publishDate 2014
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:263373d3-4308-4c23-8e80-d6490a338cef2022-03-26T11:59:34ZThe nature of tremor circuits in parkinsonian and essential tremor.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:263373d3-4308-4c23-8e80-d6490a338cefEnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordOxford University Press2014Cagnan, HLittle, SFoltynie, TLimousin, PZrinzo, LHariz, MCheeran, BFitzgerald, JGreen, AAziz, TBrown, PTremor is a cardinal feature of Parkinson's disease and essential tremor, the two most common movement disorders. Yet, the mechanisms underlying tremor generation remain largely unknown. We hypothesized that driving deep brain stimulation electrodes at a frequency closely matching the patient's own tremor frequency should interact with neural activity responsible for tremor, and that the effect of stimulation on tremor should reveal the role of different deep brain stimulation targets in tremor generation. Moreover, tremor responses to stimulation might reveal pathophysiological differences between parkinsonian and essential tremor circuits. Accordingly, we stimulated 15 patients with Parkinson's disease with either thalamic or subthalamic electrodes (13 male and two female patients, age: 50-77 years) and 10 patients with essential tremor with thalamic electrodes (nine male and one female patients, age: 34-74 years). Stimulation at near-to tremor frequency entrained tremor in all three patient groups (ventrolateral thalamic stimulation in Parkinson's disease, P=0.0078, subthalamic stimulation in Parkinson's disease, P=0.0312; ventrolateral thalamic stimulation in essential tremor, P=0.0137; two-tailed paired Wilcoxon signed-rank tests). However, only ventrolateral thalamic stimulation in essential tremor modulated postural tremor amplitude according to the timing of stimulation pulses with respect to the tremor cycle (e.g. P=0.0002 for tremor amplification, two-tailed Wilcoxon rank sum test). Parkinsonian rest and essential postural tremor severity (i.e. tremor amplitude) differed in their relative tolerance to spontaneous changes in tremor frequency when stimulation was not applied. Specifically, the amplitude of parkinsonian rest tremor remained unchanged despite spontaneous changes in tremor frequency, whereas that of essential postural tremor reduced when tremor frequency departed from median values. Based on these results we conclude that parkinsonian rest tremor is driven by a neural network, which includes the subthalamic nucleus and ventrolateral thalamus and has broad frequency-amplitude tolerance. We propose that it is this tolerance to changes in tremor frequency that dictates that parkinsonian rest tremor may be significantly entrained by low frequency stimulation without stimulation timing-dependent amplitude modulation. In contrast, the circuit influenced by low frequency thalamic stimulation in essential tremor has a narrower frequency-amplitude tolerance so that tremor entrainment through extrinsic driving is necessarily accompanied by amplitude modulation. Such differences in parkinsonian rest and essential tremor will be important in selecting future strategies for closed loop deep brain stimulation for tremor control.
spellingShingle Cagnan, H
Little, S
Foltynie, T
Limousin, P
Zrinzo, L
Hariz, M
Cheeran, B
Fitzgerald, J
Green, A
Aziz, T
Brown, P
The nature of tremor circuits in parkinsonian and essential tremor.
title The nature of tremor circuits in parkinsonian and essential tremor.
title_full The nature of tremor circuits in parkinsonian and essential tremor.
title_fullStr The nature of tremor circuits in parkinsonian and essential tremor.
title_full_unstemmed The nature of tremor circuits in parkinsonian and essential tremor.
title_short The nature of tremor circuits in parkinsonian and essential tremor.
title_sort nature of tremor circuits in parkinsonian and essential tremor
work_keys_str_mv AT cagnanh thenatureoftremorcircuitsinparkinsonianandessentialtremor
AT littles thenatureoftremorcircuitsinparkinsonianandessentialtremor
AT foltyniet thenatureoftremorcircuitsinparkinsonianandessentialtremor
AT limousinp thenatureoftremorcircuitsinparkinsonianandessentialtremor
AT zrinzol thenatureoftremorcircuitsinparkinsonianandessentialtremor
AT harizm thenatureoftremorcircuitsinparkinsonianandessentialtremor
AT cheeranb thenatureoftremorcircuitsinparkinsonianandessentialtremor
AT fitzgeraldj thenatureoftremorcircuitsinparkinsonianandessentialtremor
AT greena thenatureoftremorcircuitsinparkinsonianandessentialtremor
AT azizt thenatureoftremorcircuitsinparkinsonianandessentialtremor
AT brownp thenatureoftremorcircuitsinparkinsonianandessentialtremor
AT cagnanh natureoftremorcircuitsinparkinsonianandessentialtremor
AT littles natureoftremorcircuitsinparkinsonianandessentialtremor
AT foltyniet natureoftremorcircuitsinparkinsonianandessentialtremor
AT limousinp natureoftremorcircuitsinparkinsonianandessentialtremor
AT zrinzol natureoftremorcircuitsinparkinsonianandessentialtremor
AT harizm natureoftremorcircuitsinparkinsonianandessentialtremor
AT cheeranb natureoftremorcircuitsinparkinsonianandessentialtremor
AT fitzgeraldj natureoftremorcircuitsinparkinsonianandessentialtremor
AT greena natureoftremorcircuitsinparkinsonianandessentialtremor
AT azizt natureoftremorcircuitsinparkinsonianandessentialtremor
AT brownp natureoftremorcircuitsinparkinsonianandessentialtremor