State reluctance to use alternatives to detention
States continue to show a marked reluctance to implement alternatives to immigration detention. The reason for this may well be because such alternatives ignore the disciplinary function of detention by which states coerce people into cooperation.
Main Author: | de Senarclens, C |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Published: |
Refugee Studies Centre, University of Oxford
2013
|
Subjects: |
Similar Items
-
Immigration detention: looking at the alternatives
by: Amaral, P
Published: (2013) -
Questions over alternatives to detention programmes
by: Silverman, S
Published: (2013) -
New models for alternatives to detention in the US
by: Bremer, M, et al.
Published: (2013) -
Alternatives to detention in the UK: from enforcement to engagement?
by: Phelps, J
Published: (2013) -
Alternatives to detention: ‘open family units’ in Belgium
by: Schockaert, L
Published: (2013)