On the dimensional indeterminacy of one-wave factor analysis under causal effects
It is shown, with two sets of indicators that separately load on two distinct factors, independent of one another conditional on the past, that if it is the case that at least one of the factors causally affects the other, then, in many settings, the process will converge to a factor model in which...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
De Gruyter
2023
|
| _version_ | 1826312632402968576 |
|---|---|
| author | VanderWeele, TJ Batty, CJK |
| author_facet | VanderWeele, TJ Batty, CJK |
| author_sort | VanderWeele, TJ |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | It is shown, with two sets of indicators that separately load on two distinct factors, independent of one another conditional on the past, that if it is the case that at least one of the factors causally affects the other, then, in many settings, the process will converge to a factor model in which a single factor will suffice to capture the covariance structure among the indicators. Factor analysis with one wave of data then cannot distinguish between factor models with a single factor vs those with two factors that are causally related. Therefore, unless causal relations between factors can be ruled out a priori, alleged empirical evidence from one-wave factor analysis for a single factor still leaves open the possibilities of a single factor or of two factors that causally affect one another. The implications for interpreting the factor structure of psychological scales, such as self-report scales for anxiety and depression, or for happiness and purpose, are discussed. The results are further illustrated through simulations to gain insight into the practical implications of the results in more realistic settings prior to the convergence of the processes. Some further generalizations to an arbitrary number of underlying factors are noted. Factor analyses with one wave of data should themselves be interpreted as characterizing associations among indicators that may be present either due to conceptual relations or due to causal relations concerning the underlying construct phenomena. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T07:57:04Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:266cedcc-5a27-47dc-a4ad-9d11e1a743ea |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-09T03:57:29Z |
| publishDate | 2023 |
| publisher | De Gruyter |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:266cedcc-5a27-47dc-a4ad-9d11e1a743ea2024-03-22T13:18:08ZOn the dimensional indeterminacy of one-wave factor analysis under causal effectsJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:266cedcc-5a27-47dc-a4ad-9d11e1a743eaEnglishSymplectic ElementsDe Gruyter2023VanderWeele, TJBatty, CJKIt is shown, with two sets of indicators that separately load on two distinct factors, independent of one another conditional on the past, that if it is the case that at least one of the factors causally affects the other, then, in many settings, the process will converge to a factor model in which a single factor will suffice to capture the covariance structure among the indicators. Factor analysis with one wave of data then cannot distinguish between factor models with a single factor vs those with two factors that are causally related. Therefore, unless causal relations between factors can be ruled out a priori, alleged empirical evidence from one-wave factor analysis for a single factor still leaves open the possibilities of a single factor or of two factors that causally affect one another. The implications for interpreting the factor structure of psychological scales, such as self-report scales for anxiety and depression, or for happiness and purpose, are discussed. The results are further illustrated through simulations to gain insight into the practical implications of the results in more realistic settings prior to the convergence of the processes. Some further generalizations to an arbitrary number of underlying factors are noted. Factor analyses with one wave of data should themselves be interpreted as characterizing associations among indicators that may be present either due to conceptual relations or due to causal relations concerning the underlying construct phenomena. |
| spellingShingle | VanderWeele, TJ Batty, CJK On the dimensional indeterminacy of one-wave factor analysis under causal effects |
| title | On the dimensional indeterminacy of one-wave factor analysis under causal effects |
| title_full | On the dimensional indeterminacy of one-wave factor analysis under causal effects |
| title_fullStr | On the dimensional indeterminacy of one-wave factor analysis under causal effects |
| title_full_unstemmed | On the dimensional indeterminacy of one-wave factor analysis under causal effects |
| title_short | On the dimensional indeterminacy of one-wave factor analysis under causal effects |
| title_sort | on the dimensional indeterminacy of one wave factor analysis under causal effects |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT vanderweeletj onthedimensionalindeterminacyofonewavefactoranalysisundercausaleffects AT battycjk onthedimensionalindeterminacyofonewavefactoranalysisundercausaleffects |