The case for partial knee replacement
The case for greater use of medial UKA in knee arthroplasty surgery rests on the benefits for patients of faster recovery, less morbidity, less mortality and better functional outcome when compared to TKA. This has been supported by improved longterm results and recognition of the large number of pa...
Main Author: | Price, A |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2010
|
Similar Items
-
Further reflections on TOPKAT and Partial vs. Total Knee Replacement-response to authors
by: Beard, DJ, et al.
Published: (2020) -
Partial or total knee replacement? Identifying patients’ information needs on knee replacement surgery: a qualitative study to inform a decision aid
by: Smith, S, et al.
Published: (2019) -
Unicompartmental knee replacement for patients with partial thickness cartilage loss in the affected compartment
by: Pandit, H, et al.
Published: (2010) -
Unicompartmental knee replacement for patients with partial thickness cartilage loss in the affected compartment.
by: Pandit, H, et al.
Published: (2011) -
Unicompartmental knee replacement for patients with partial thickness cartilage loss in the affected compartment.
by: Pandit, H, et al.
Published: (2011)