Learners restrict their linguistic generalizations using preemption but not entrenchment: evidence from artificial language learning studies with adults and children
A central goal of research into language acquisition is explaining how, when learners generalize to new cases, they appropriately RESTRICT their generalizations (e.g., to avoid producing ungrammatical utterance such as *<i>The clown laughed the man</i>). The past 30 years have seen an un...
Autors principals: | Samara, A, Wonnacott, E, Saxena, G, Maitreyee, R, Fazekas, J, Ambridge, B |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Idioma: | English |
Publicat: |
American Psychological Association
2023
|
Ítems similars
-
Effects of Both Preemption and Entrenchment in the Retreat from Verb Overgeneralization Errors: Four Reanalyses, an Extended Replication, and a Meta-Analytic Synthesis
per: Ben Ambridge, et al.
Publicat: (2018-07-01) -
Semantic cues in language learning: an artificial language study with adult and child learners
per: Brown, H, et al.
Publicat: (2021) -
Children learn ergative case marking in Hindi using statistical preemption and clause-level semantics (intentionality): evidence from acceptability judgment and elicited production studies with children and adults [version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
per: Pruthwik Mishra, et al.
Publicat: (2023-09-01) -
Children learn ergative case marking in Hindi using statistical preemption and clause-level semantics (intentionality): evidence from acceptability judgment and elicited production studies with children and adults [version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
per: Pruthwik Mishra, et al.
Publicat: (2023-03-01) -
Why entrench?
per: Barber, N
Publicat: (2016)