Dissociable roles for cortical and subcortical structures in memory retrieval and acquisition

The relationship between anterograde and retrograde amnesia remains unclear. Previous data from both clinical neuropsychology and monkey lesion studies suggest that damage to discrete subcortical structures leads to a relatively greater degree of anterograde than retrograde amnesia, whereas damage t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mitchell, A, Browning, P, Wilson, C, Baxter, MG, Gaffan, D
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 2008
_version_ 1797059437607780352
author Mitchell, A
Browning, P
Wilson, C
Baxter, MG
Gaffan, D
author_facet Mitchell, A
Browning, P
Wilson, C
Baxter, MG
Gaffan, D
author_sort Mitchell, A
collection OXFORD
description The relationship between anterograde and retrograde amnesia remains unclear. Previous data from both clinical neuropsychology and monkey lesion studies suggest that damage to discrete subcortical structures leads to a relatively greater degree of anterograde than retrograde amnesia, whereas damage to discrete regions of cortex leads to the opposite pattern of impairments. Nevertheless, damage to the medial diencephalon in humans is associated with both retrograde and anterograde amnesia. In the present study, we sought to reconcile this by assessing retention as well as subsequent relearning and new postoperative learning. Rhesus monkeys learned 300 unique scene discriminations preoperatively, and retention was assessed in a preoperative and postoperative one-trial retrieval test. Combined bilateral subcortical lesions to the magnocellular mediodorsal thalamus and fornix impaired postoperative retention of the preoperatively acquired information. In addition, subsequent relearning and new postoperative learning were also impaired. This contrasts with the effects of a discrete lesion to just one of these structures, after which retention is intact in both cases. Discrete bilateral ablations to the entorhinal cortex impaired retention but had no effect on new learning. Combined with previous work from our laboratory, these results support the hypothesis that subcortical damage has a relatively greater effect on new learning, and cortical damage has a relatively greater effect on retention. Furthermore, the results demonstrate that retrograde amnesia occurs as a result of subcortical damage only if it is widespread, leading to an extensive disruption of cortical functioning. Damage of this nature may account for dense amnesia. Copyright © 2008 Society for Neuroscience.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T20:04:15Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:2861f43f-e981-4ce0-abd8-0bb8a4275608
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T20:04:15Z
publishDate 2008
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:2861f43f-e981-4ce0-abd8-0bb8a42756082022-03-26T12:12:33ZDissociable roles for cortical and subcortical structures in memory retrieval and acquisitionJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:2861f43f-e981-4ce0-abd8-0bb8a4275608EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2008Mitchell, ABrowning, PWilson, CBaxter, MGGaffan, DThe relationship between anterograde and retrograde amnesia remains unclear. Previous data from both clinical neuropsychology and monkey lesion studies suggest that damage to discrete subcortical structures leads to a relatively greater degree of anterograde than retrograde amnesia, whereas damage to discrete regions of cortex leads to the opposite pattern of impairments. Nevertheless, damage to the medial diencephalon in humans is associated with both retrograde and anterograde amnesia. In the present study, we sought to reconcile this by assessing retention as well as subsequent relearning and new postoperative learning. Rhesus monkeys learned 300 unique scene discriminations preoperatively, and retention was assessed in a preoperative and postoperative one-trial retrieval test. Combined bilateral subcortical lesions to the magnocellular mediodorsal thalamus and fornix impaired postoperative retention of the preoperatively acquired information. In addition, subsequent relearning and new postoperative learning were also impaired. This contrasts with the effects of a discrete lesion to just one of these structures, after which retention is intact in both cases. Discrete bilateral ablations to the entorhinal cortex impaired retention but had no effect on new learning. Combined with previous work from our laboratory, these results support the hypothesis that subcortical damage has a relatively greater effect on new learning, and cortical damage has a relatively greater effect on retention. Furthermore, the results demonstrate that retrograde amnesia occurs as a result of subcortical damage only if it is widespread, leading to an extensive disruption of cortical functioning. Damage of this nature may account for dense amnesia. Copyright © 2008 Society for Neuroscience.
spellingShingle Mitchell, A
Browning, P
Wilson, C
Baxter, MG
Gaffan, D
Dissociable roles for cortical and subcortical structures in memory retrieval and acquisition
title Dissociable roles for cortical and subcortical structures in memory retrieval and acquisition
title_full Dissociable roles for cortical and subcortical structures in memory retrieval and acquisition
title_fullStr Dissociable roles for cortical and subcortical structures in memory retrieval and acquisition
title_full_unstemmed Dissociable roles for cortical and subcortical structures in memory retrieval and acquisition
title_short Dissociable roles for cortical and subcortical structures in memory retrieval and acquisition
title_sort dissociable roles for cortical and subcortical structures in memory retrieval and acquisition
work_keys_str_mv AT mitchella dissociablerolesforcorticalandsubcorticalstructuresinmemoryretrievalandacquisition
AT browningp dissociablerolesforcorticalandsubcorticalstructuresinmemoryretrievalandacquisition
AT wilsonc dissociablerolesforcorticalandsubcorticalstructuresinmemoryretrievalandacquisition
AT baxtermg dissociablerolesforcorticalandsubcorticalstructuresinmemoryretrievalandacquisition
AT gaffand dissociablerolesforcorticalandsubcorticalstructuresinmemoryretrievalandacquisition