Credibility assessment in child sexual abuse investigations: A descriptive analysis.

A major challenge in cases of child sexual abuse (CSA) is determining the credibility of children's reports. Consequently cases may be misclassified as false or deemed 'no judgment possible'. Based on a large national sample of reports of CSA made in Israel in 2014, the study examines...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Melkman, E, Hershkowitz, I, Zur, R
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2017
_version_ 1797059481063915520
author Melkman, E
Hershkowitz, I
Zur, R
author_facet Melkman, E
Hershkowitz, I
Zur, R
author_sort Melkman, E
collection OXFORD
description A major challenge in cases of child sexual abuse (CSA) is determining the credibility of children's reports. Consequently cases may be misclassified as false or deemed 'no judgment possible'. Based on a large national sample of reports of CSA made in Israel in 2014, the study examines child and event characteristics contributing to the probability that reports of abuse would be judged credible. National data files of all children aged 3-14, who were referred for investigation following suspected victimization of sexual abuse, and had disclosed sexual abuse, were analyzed. Cases were classified as either 'credible' or 'no judgment possible'. The probability of reaching a 'credible' judgment was examined in relation to characteristics of the child (age, gender, cognitive delay, marital status of the parents,) and of the abusive event (abuse severity, frequency, perpetrator-victim relationship, perpetrator's use of grooming, and perpetrator's use of coercion), controlling for investigator's identity at the cluster level of the analysis. Of 1563 cases analyzed, 57.9% were assessed as credible. The most powerful predictors of a credible judgment were older age and absence of a cognitive delay. Reports of children to married parents, who experienced a single abusive event that involved perpetrator's use of grooming, were also more likely to be judged as credible. Rates of credible judgments found are lower than expected suggesting under-identification of truthful reports of CSA. In particular, those cases of severe and multiple abuse involving younger and cognitively delayed children are the ones with the lowest chances of being assessed as credible.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T20:04:51Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:28933e84-ba6f-43cc-ae3d-fce8cb3f50ac
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T20:04:51Z
publishDate 2017
publisher Elsevier
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:28933e84-ba6f-43cc-ae3d-fce8cb3f50ac2022-03-26T12:13:42ZCredibility assessment in child sexual abuse investigations: A descriptive analysis.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:28933e84-ba6f-43cc-ae3d-fce8cb3f50acEnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordElsevier2017Melkman, EHershkowitz, IZur, RA major challenge in cases of child sexual abuse (CSA) is determining the credibility of children's reports. Consequently cases may be misclassified as false or deemed 'no judgment possible'. Based on a large national sample of reports of CSA made in Israel in 2014, the study examines child and event characteristics contributing to the probability that reports of abuse would be judged credible. National data files of all children aged 3-14, who were referred for investigation following suspected victimization of sexual abuse, and had disclosed sexual abuse, were analyzed. Cases were classified as either 'credible' or 'no judgment possible'. The probability of reaching a 'credible' judgment was examined in relation to characteristics of the child (age, gender, cognitive delay, marital status of the parents,) and of the abusive event (abuse severity, frequency, perpetrator-victim relationship, perpetrator's use of grooming, and perpetrator's use of coercion), controlling for investigator's identity at the cluster level of the analysis. Of 1563 cases analyzed, 57.9% were assessed as credible. The most powerful predictors of a credible judgment were older age and absence of a cognitive delay. Reports of children to married parents, who experienced a single abusive event that involved perpetrator's use of grooming, were also more likely to be judged as credible. Rates of credible judgments found are lower than expected suggesting under-identification of truthful reports of CSA. In particular, those cases of severe and multiple abuse involving younger and cognitively delayed children are the ones with the lowest chances of being assessed as credible.
spellingShingle Melkman, E
Hershkowitz, I
Zur, R
Credibility assessment in child sexual abuse investigations: A descriptive analysis.
title Credibility assessment in child sexual abuse investigations: A descriptive analysis.
title_full Credibility assessment in child sexual abuse investigations: A descriptive analysis.
title_fullStr Credibility assessment in child sexual abuse investigations: A descriptive analysis.
title_full_unstemmed Credibility assessment in child sexual abuse investigations: A descriptive analysis.
title_short Credibility assessment in child sexual abuse investigations: A descriptive analysis.
title_sort credibility assessment in child sexual abuse investigations a descriptive analysis
work_keys_str_mv AT melkmane credibilityassessmentinchildsexualabuseinvestigationsadescriptiveanalysis
AT hershkowitzi credibilityassessmentinchildsexualabuseinvestigationsadescriptiveanalysis
AT zurr credibilityassessmentinchildsexualabuseinvestigationsadescriptiveanalysis