Estimating the cost-effectiveness of salt reformulation and increasing access to leisure centres in England, with PRIMEtime CE model validation using the AdViSHE tool

<p style="text-align:justify;"> <b>Background:</b> PRIMEtime CE is a multistate life table model that can directly compare the cost effectiveness of public health interventions affecting diet and physical activity levels, helping to inform decisions about how to spend fi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Briggs, ADM, Wolstenholme, J, Scarborough, P
Format: Journal article
Published: BioMed Central 2019
_version_ 1797059577421758464
author Briggs, ADM
Wolstenholme, J
Scarborough, P
author_facet Briggs, ADM
Wolstenholme, J
Scarborough, P
author_sort Briggs, ADM
collection OXFORD
description <p style="text-align:justify;"> <b>Background:</b> PRIMEtime CE is a multistate life table model that can directly compare the cost effectiveness of public health interventions affecting diet and physical activity levels, helping to inform decisions about how to spend finite resources. This paper estimates the costs and health outcomes in England of two scenarios: reformulating salt and expanding subsidised access to leisure centres. The results are used to help validate PRIMEtime CE, following the steps outlined in the Assessment of the Validation Status of Health-Economic decision models (AdViSHE) tool.<br/> <b>Methods:</b> The PRIMEtime CE model estimates the difference in quality adjusted life years (QALYs) and difference in NHS and social care costs of modelled interventions compared with doing nothing. The salt reformulation scenario models how salt consumption would change if food producers met the 2017 UK Food Standards Agency salt reformulation targets. The leisure centre scenario models change in physical activity levels if the Birmingham Be Active scheme (where swimming pools and gym access is free to residents during defined periods) was rolled out across England.<br/> The AdViSHE tool was developed by health economic modellers and divides model validation into five parts: validation of the conceptual model, input data validation, validation of computerised model, operational validation, and other validation techniques. PRIMEtime CE is discussed in relation to each part.<br/> <b>Results:</b> Salt reformulation was dominant compared with doing nothing, and had a 10-year return on investment of £1.44 (£0.50 to £2.94) for every £1 spent. By contrast, over 10 years the Be Active expansion would cost £727,000 (£514,000 to £1,064,000) per QALY.<br/> PRIMEtime CE has good face validity of its conceptual model and has robust input data. Cross-validation produces mixed results and shows the impact of model scope, input parameters, and model structure on cost-per-QALY estimates.<br/> <b>Conclusions:</b> This paper illustrates how PRIMEtime CE can be used to compare the cost-effectiveness of two different public health measures affecting diet and physical activity levels. The AdViSHE tool helps to validate PRIMEtime CE, identifies some of the key drivers of model estimates, and highlights the challenges of externally validating public health economic models against independent data. </p>
first_indexed 2024-03-06T20:06:18Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:2903b9d6-de4a-438b-aca5-d28d6ab8a559
institution University of Oxford
last_indexed 2024-03-06T20:06:18Z
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:2903b9d6-de4a-438b-aca5-d28d6ab8a5592022-03-26T12:16:33ZEstimating the cost-effectiveness of salt reformulation and increasing access to leisure centres in England, with PRIMEtime CE model validation using the AdViSHE toolJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:2903b9d6-de4a-438b-aca5-d28d6ab8a559Symplectic Elements at OxfordBioMed Central2019Briggs, ADMWolstenholme, JScarborough, P <p style="text-align:justify;"> <b>Background:</b> PRIMEtime CE is a multistate life table model that can directly compare the cost effectiveness of public health interventions affecting diet and physical activity levels, helping to inform decisions about how to spend finite resources. This paper estimates the costs and health outcomes in England of two scenarios: reformulating salt and expanding subsidised access to leisure centres. The results are used to help validate PRIMEtime CE, following the steps outlined in the Assessment of the Validation Status of Health-Economic decision models (AdViSHE) tool.<br/> <b>Methods:</b> The PRIMEtime CE model estimates the difference in quality adjusted life years (QALYs) and difference in NHS and social care costs of modelled interventions compared with doing nothing. The salt reformulation scenario models how salt consumption would change if food producers met the 2017 UK Food Standards Agency salt reformulation targets. The leisure centre scenario models change in physical activity levels if the Birmingham Be Active scheme (where swimming pools and gym access is free to residents during defined periods) was rolled out across England.<br/> The AdViSHE tool was developed by health economic modellers and divides model validation into five parts: validation of the conceptual model, input data validation, validation of computerised model, operational validation, and other validation techniques. PRIMEtime CE is discussed in relation to each part.<br/> <b>Results:</b> Salt reformulation was dominant compared with doing nothing, and had a 10-year return on investment of £1.44 (£0.50 to £2.94) for every £1 spent. By contrast, over 10 years the Be Active expansion would cost £727,000 (£514,000 to £1,064,000) per QALY.<br/> PRIMEtime CE has good face validity of its conceptual model and has robust input data. Cross-validation produces mixed results and shows the impact of model scope, input parameters, and model structure on cost-per-QALY estimates.<br/> <b>Conclusions:</b> This paper illustrates how PRIMEtime CE can be used to compare the cost-effectiveness of two different public health measures affecting diet and physical activity levels. The AdViSHE tool helps to validate PRIMEtime CE, identifies some of the key drivers of model estimates, and highlights the challenges of externally validating public health economic models against independent data. </p>
spellingShingle Briggs, ADM
Wolstenholme, J
Scarborough, P
Estimating the cost-effectiveness of salt reformulation and increasing access to leisure centres in England, with PRIMEtime CE model validation using the AdViSHE tool
title Estimating the cost-effectiveness of salt reformulation and increasing access to leisure centres in England, with PRIMEtime CE model validation using the AdViSHE tool
title_full Estimating the cost-effectiveness of salt reformulation and increasing access to leisure centres in England, with PRIMEtime CE model validation using the AdViSHE tool
title_fullStr Estimating the cost-effectiveness of salt reformulation and increasing access to leisure centres in England, with PRIMEtime CE model validation using the AdViSHE tool
title_full_unstemmed Estimating the cost-effectiveness of salt reformulation and increasing access to leisure centres in England, with PRIMEtime CE model validation using the AdViSHE tool
title_short Estimating the cost-effectiveness of salt reformulation and increasing access to leisure centres in England, with PRIMEtime CE model validation using the AdViSHE tool
title_sort estimating the cost effectiveness of salt reformulation and increasing access to leisure centres in england with primetime ce model validation using the advishe tool
work_keys_str_mv AT briggsadm estimatingthecosteffectivenessofsaltreformulationandincreasingaccesstoleisurecentresinenglandwithprimetimecemodelvalidationusingtheadvishetool
AT wolstenholmej estimatingthecosteffectivenessofsaltreformulationandincreasingaccesstoleisurecentresinenglandwithprimetimecemodelvalidationusingtheadvishetool
AT scarboroughp estimatingthecosteffectivenessofsaltreformulationandincreasingaccesstoleisurecentresinenglandwithprimetimecemodelvalidationusingtheadvishetool