Rethinking subnational government capacity in China

It is clear that some subnational governments are better than others at orchestrating major policy programs, yet important questions remain about how and why subnational government capacity varies from case to case. Scholarship that emphasizes political agency in explaining subnational policy outcom...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jaros, K
Format: Journal article
Published: Taylor and Francis 2016
_version_ 1797059586818048000
author Jaros, K
author_facet Jaros, K
author_sort Jaros, K
collection OXFORD
description It is clear that some subnational governments are better than others at orchestrating major policy programs, yet important questions remain about how and why subnational government capacity varies from case to case. Scholarship that emphasizes political agency in explaining subnational policy outcomes is not always clear as to where such agency comes from. Meanwhile, research that defines the power of subnational units in terms of their formal administrative authority, fiscal capacity, and political status does not fully explain how these structural endowments translate into effective agency. This article works toward a conception of subnational government capacity better able to integrate these approaches and bridge the agency-structure divide. I call for greater attention to the connective structures that enable subnational governments to take the initiative in policymaking and mobilize resources, stressing provinces’ internal cohesion and upward political ties. To illustrate the need for a broader conception of subnational capacity, and to show the importance of connective power in action, I analyze the contrasting outcomes of regional development strategies in two Chinese provinces.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T20:06:26Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:290ee68c-edcd-43d2-bb43-b244da31dd7b
institution University of Oxford
last_indexed 2024-03-06T20:06:26Z
publishDate 2016
publisher Taylor and Francis
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:290ee68c-edcd-43d2-bb43-b244da31dd7b2022-03-26T12:16:44ZRethinking subnational government capacity in ChinaJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:290ee68c-edcd-43d2-bb43-b244da31dd7bSymplectic Elements at OxfordTaylor and Francis2016Jaros, KIt is clear that some subnational governments are better than others at orchestrating major policy programs, yet important questions remain about how and why subnational government capacity varies from case to case. Scholarship that emphasizes political agency in explaining subnational policy outcomes is not always clear as to where such agency comes from. Meanwhile, research that defines the power of subnational units in terms of their formal administrative authority, fiscal capacity, and political status does not fully explain how these structural endowments translate into effective agency. This article works toward a conception of subnational government capacity better able to integrate these approaches and bridge the agency-structure divide. I call for greater attention to the connective structures that enable subnational governments to take the initiative in policymaking and mobilize resources, stressing provinces’ internal cohesion and upward political ties. To illustrate the need for a broader conception of subnational capacity, and to show the importance of connective power in action, I analyze the contrasting outcomes of regional development strategies in two Chinese provinces.
spellingShingle Jaros, K
Rethinking subnational government capacity in China
title Rethinking subnational government capacity in China
title_full Rethinking subnational government capacity in China
title_fullStr Rethinking subnational government capacity in China
title_full_unstemmed Rethinking subnational government capacity in China
title_short Rethinking subnational government capacity in China
title_sort rethinking subnational government capacity in china
work_keys_str_mv AT jarosk rethinkingsubnationalgovernmentcapacityinchina