Processing power limits social group size: computational evidence for the cognitive costs of sociality

Sociality is primarily a coordination problem. However, the social (or communication) complexity hypothesis suggests that the kinds of information that can be acquired and processed may limit the size and/or complexity of social groups that a species can maintain. We use an agent-based model to test...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dávid-Barrett, T, Dunbar, R
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Royal Society 2013
_version_ 1797059639528914944
author Dávid-Barrett, T
Dunbar, R
author_facet Dávid-Barrett, T
Dunbar, R
author_sort Dávid-Barrett, T
collection OXFORD
description Sociality is primarily a coordination problem. However, the social (or communication) complexity hypothesis suggests that the kinds of information that can be acquired and processed may limit the size and/or complexity of social groups that a species can maintain. We use an agent-based model to test the hypothesis that the complexity of information processed influences the computational demands involved. We show that successive increases in the kinds of information processed allow organisms to break through the glass ceilings that otherwise limit the size of social groups: larger groups can only be achieved at the cost of more sophisticated kinds of information processing that are disadvantageous when optimal group size is small. These results simultaneously support both the social brain and the social complexity hypotheses.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T20:07:08Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:2942a5d0-05f2-4679-ab9c-01452ab324e0
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T20:07:08Z
publishDate 2013
publisher Royal Society
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:2942a5d0-05f2-4679-ab9c-01452ab324e02022-03-26T12:18:09ZProcessing power limits social group size: computational evidence for the cognitive costs of socialityJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:2942a5d0-05f2-4679-ab9c-01452ab324e0EnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordRoyal Society2013Dávid-Barrett, TDunbar, RSociality is primarily a coordination problem. However, the social (or communication) complexity hypothesis suggests that the kinds of information that can be acquired and processed may limit the size and/or complexity of social groups that a species can maintain. We use an agent-based model to test the hypothesis that the complexity of information processed influences the computational demands involved. We show that successive increases in the kinds of information processed allow organisms to break through the glass ceilings that otherwise limit the size of social groups: larger groups can only be achieved at the cost of more sophisticated kinds of information processing that are disadvantageous when optimal group size is small. These results simultaneously support both the social brain and the social complexity hypotheses.
spellingShingle Dávid-Barrett, T
Dunbar, R
Processing power limits social group size: computational evidence for the cognitive costs of sociality
title Processing power limits social group size: computational evidence for the cognitive costs of sociality
title_full Processing power limits social group size: computational evidence for the cognitive costs of sociality
title_fullStr Processing power limits social group size: computational evidence for the cognitive costs of sociality
title_full_unstemmed Processing power limits social group size: computational evidence for the cognitive costs of sociality
title_short Processing power limits social group size: computational evidence for the cognitive costs of sociality
title_sort processing power limits social group size computational evidence for the cognitive costs of sociality
work_keys_str_mv AT davidbarrettt processingpowerlimitssocialgroupsizecomputationalevidenceforthecognitivecostsofsociality
AT dunbarr processingpowerlimitssocialgroupsizecomputationalevidenceforthecognitivecostsofsociality