The effect of oral vocabulary training on reading novel complex words

Do readers benefit from their knowledge of the phonological form and meaning of stems when seeing them embedded in morphologically complex words for the first time in print? This question was addressed using a word learning paradigm. Participants were trained on novel spoken word stems and their mea...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Beyersmann, E, Wegener, S, Pescuma, VN, Nation, K, Colenbrander, D, Castles, A
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publications 2022
_version_ 1797110376436858880
author Beyersmann, E
Wegener, S
Pescuma, VN
Nation, K
Colenbrander, D
Castles, A
author_facet Beyersmann, E
Wegener, S
Pescuma, VN
Nation, K
Colenbrander, D
Castles, A
author_sort Beyersmann, E
collection OXFORD
description Do readers benefit from their knowledge of the phonological form and meaning of stems when seeing them embedded in morphologically complex words for the first time in print? This question was addressed using a word learning paradigm. Participants were trained on novel spoken word stems and their meanings (“tump”). Following training, participants then saw the novel stems for the first time in print, either in combination with a real affix (tumpist, tumpor) or a non-affix (tumpel, tumpain). Untrained items were also included to test if the affix effect was modulated by the prior training of the spoken word stems. First, the complex words were embedded in meaningful sentences which participants read as their eye movements were recorded (first orthographic exposure). Second, participants were asked to read aloud and spell each individual complex novel word (second orthographic exposure). Participants spent less time fixating on words that included trained stems compared to untrained stems. However, the training effect did not change depending on whether stems were accompanied by a real affix or a non-affix. In the reading aloud and spelling tasks, there was no effect of training, suggesting that the effect of oral vocabulary training did not extend beyond the initial print exposure. The results indicate that familiarity with spoken stems influences how complex words containing those stems are processed when being read for the first time. Our findings highlight the flexibility and adaptability of the morphological processing system to novel complex words during the first print exposure.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T07:54:07Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:2984670b-4c48-4d2f-a579-5294eb27bc06
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T07:54:07Z
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:2984670b-4c48-4d2f-a579-5294eb27bc062023-08-09T09:13:53ZThe effect of oral vocabulary training on reading novel complex wordsJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:2984670b-4c48-4d2f-a579-5294eb27bc06EnglishSymplectic ElementsSAGE Publications2022Beyersmann, EWegener, SPescuma, VNNation, KColenbrander, DCastles, ADo readers benefit from their knowledge of the phonological form and meaning of stems when seeing them embedded in morphologically complex words for the first time in print? This question was addressed using a word learning paradigm. Participants were trained on novel spoken word stems and their meanings (“tump”). Following training, participants then saw the novel stems for the first time in print, either in combination with a real affix (tumpist, tumpor) or a non-affix (tumpel, tumpain). Untrained items were also included to test if the affix effect was modulated by the prior training of the spoken word stems. First, the complex words were embedded in meaningful sentences which participants read as their eye movements were recorded (first orthographic exposure). Second, participants were asked to read aloud and spell each individual complex novel word (second orthographic exposure). Participants spent less time fixating on words that included trained stems compared to untrained stems. However, the training effect did not change depending on whether stems were accompanied by a real affix or a non-affix. In the reading aloud and spelling tasks, there was no effect of training, suggesting that the effect of oral vocabulary training did not extend beyond the initial print exposure. The results indicate that familiarity with spoken stems influences how complex words containing those stems are processed when being read for the first time. Our findings highlight the flexibility and adaptability of the morphological processing system to novel complex words during the first print exposure.
spellingShingle Beyersmann, E
Wegener, S
Pescuma, VN
Nation, K
Colenbrander, D
Castles, A
The effect of oral vocabulary training on reading novel complex words
title The effect of oral vocabulary training on reading novel complex words
title_full The effect of oral vocabulary training on reading novel complex words
title_fullStr The effect of oral vocabulary training on reading novel complex words
title_full_unstemmed The effect of oral vocabulary training on reading novel complex words
title_short The effect of oral vocabulary training on reading novel complex words
title_sort effect of oral vocabulary training on reading novel complex words
work_keys_str_mv AT beyersmanne theeffectoforalvocabularytrainingonreadingnovelcomplexwords
AT wegeners theeffectoforalvocabularytrainingonreadingnovelcomplexwords
AT pescumavn theeffectoforalvocabularytrainingonreadingnovelcomplexwords
AT nationk theeffectoforalvocabularytrainingonreadingnovelcomplexwords
AT colenbranderd theeffectoforalvocabularytrainingonreadingnovelcomplexwords
AT castlesa theeffectoforalvocabularytrainingonreadingnovelcomplexwords
AT beyersmanne effectoforalvocabularytrainingonreadingnovelcomplexwords
AT wegeners effectoforalvocabularytrainingonreadingnovelcomplexwords
AT pescumavn effectoforalvocabularytrainingonreadingnovelcomplexwords
AT nationk effectoforalvocabularytrainingonreadingnovelcomplexwords
AT colenbranderd effectoforalvocabularytrainingonreadingnovelcomplexwords
AT castlesa effectoforalvocabularytrainingonreadingnovelcomplexwords