Something to talk about: are conversation sizes constrained by mental modeling abilities?

Conversations are ubiquitous and central elements of daily life. Yet a fundamental feature of conversation remains a mystery: It is genuinely difficult to maintain an everyday conversation with more than four speakers. Why? We introduce a “mentalizing explanation” for the conversation size constrain...

Fuld beskrivelse

Bibliografiske detaljer
Main Authors: Krems, J, Dunbar, R, Neuberg, S
Format: Journal article
Udgivet: Elsevier 2016
_version_ 1826264671171117056
author Krems, J
Dunbar, R
Neuberg, S
author_facet Krems, J
Dunbar, R
Neuberg, S
author_sort Krems, J
collection OXFORD
description Conversations are ubiquitous and central elements of daily life. Yet a fundamental feature of conversation remains a mystery: It is genuinely difficult to maintain an everyday conversation with more than four speakers. Why? We introduce a “mentalizing explanation” for the conversation size constraint, which suggests that humans have a natural limit on their ability to model the minds of others, and that this limit, in turn, shapes the sizes of everyday conversations. Using established methodologies for investigating conversation size, we pit this mentalizing hypothesis against two competing explanations—that the size of a conversation is limited by a short-term memory capacity (limiting the factual information we process) or by an auditory constraint (speakers need to be able to hearwhat each other are saying)—in conversations drawn froma real-world college campus and fromShakespearean plays. Our results provide support for the mentalizing hypothesis and also render alternative accounts less plausible.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T20:11:35Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:2abf4992-f4d6-4e3f-ae9c-18ee3bbf9c58
institution University of Oxford
last_indexed 2024-03-06T20:11:35Z
publishDate 2016
publisher Elsevier
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:2abf4992-f4d6-4e3f-ae9c-18ee3bbf9c582022-03-26T12:26:53ZSomething to talk about: are conversation sizes constrained by mental modeling abilities?Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:2abf4992-f4d6-4e3f-ae9c-18ee3bbf9c58Symplectic Elements at OxfordElsevier2016Krems, JDunbar, RNeuberg, SConversations are ubiquitous and central elements of daily life. Yet a fundamental feature of conversation remains a mystery: It is genuinely difficult to maintain an everyday conversation with more than four speakers. Why? We introduce a “mentalizing explanation” for the conversation size constraint, which suggests that humans have a natural limit on their ability to model the minds of others, and that this limit, in turn, shapes the sizes of everyday conversations. Using established methodologies for investigating conversation size, we pit this mentalizing hypothesis against two competing explanations—that the size of a conversation is limited by a short-term memory capacity (limiting the factual information we process) or by an auditory constraint (speakers need to be able to hearwhat each other are saying)—in conversations drawn froma real-world college campus and fromShakespearean plays. Our results provide support for the mentalizing hypothesis and also render alternative accounts less plausible.
spellingShingle Krems, J
Dunbar, R
Neuberg, S
Something to talk about: are conversation sizes constrained by mental modeling abilities?
title Something to talk about: are conversation sizes constrained by mental modeling abilities?
title_full Something to talk about: are conversation sizes constrained by mental modeling abilities?
title_fullStr Something to talk about: are conversation sizes constrained by mental modeling abilities?
title_full_unstemmed Something to talk about: are conversation sizes constrained by mental modeling abilities?
title_short Something to talk about: are conversation sizes constrained by mental modeling abilities?
title_sort something to talk about are conversation sizes constrained by mental modeling abilities
work_keys_str_mv AT kremsj somethingtotalkaboutareconversationsizesconstrainedbymentalmodelingabilities
AT dunbarr somethingtotalkaboutareconversationsizesconstrainedbymentalmodelingabilities
AT neubergs somethingtotalkaboutareconversationsizesconstrainedbymentalmodelingabilities