D-mannose for prevention of recurrent urinary tract infection among women: a randomized clinical trial

<p><b> Importance</b> Recurrent urinary tract infection (UTI) is a common debilitating condition in women, with limited prophylactic options. d-Mannose has shown promise in trials based in secondary care, but effectiveness in placebo-controlled studies and community settings has n...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hayward, G, Mort, S, Hay, AD, Moore, M, Thomas, NPB, Cook, J, Robinson, J, Williams, N, Maeder, N, Edeson, R, Franssen, M, Grabey, J, Glogowska, M, Yang, Y, Allen, J, Butler, C
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: American Medical Association 2024
Description
Summary:<p><b> Importance</b> Recurrent urinary tract infection (UTI) is a common debilitating condition in women, with limited prophylactic options. d-Mannose has shown promise in trials based in secondary care, but effectiveness in placebo-controlled studies and community settings has not been established.</p> <p><b> Objective</b> To determine whether d-mannose taken for 6 months reduces the proportion of women with recurrent UTI experiencing a medically attended UTI.</p> <p><b> Design, Setting, and Participants</b> This 2-group, double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial took place across 99 primary care centers in the UK. Participants were recruited between March 28, 2019, and January 31, 2020, with 6 months of follow-up. Participants were female, 18 years or older, living in the community, and had evidence in their primary care record of consultations for at least 2 UTIs in the preceding 6 months or 3 UTIs in 12 months. Invitation to participate was made by their primary care center. A total of 7591 participants were approached, 830 responded, and 232 were ineligible or did not proceed to randomization. Statistical analysis was reported in December 2022.</p> <p><b> Intervention</b> Two grams daily of d-mannose powder or matched volume of placebo powder.</p> <p><b> Main Outcomes and Measures</b> The primary outcome measure was the proportion of women experiencing at least 1 further episode of clinically suspected UTI for which they contacted ambulatory care within 6 months of study entry. Secondary outcomes included symptom duration, antibiotic use, time to next medically attended UTI, number of suspected UTIs, and UTI-related hospital admissions.</p> <p><b> Results</b> Of 598 women eligible (mean [range] age, 58 [18-93] years), 303 were randomized to d-mannose (50.7%) and 295 to placebo (49.3%). Primary outcome data were available for 583 participants (97.5%). The proportion contacting ambulatory care with a clinically suspected UTI was 150 of 294 (51.0%) in the d-mannose group and 161 of 289 (55.7%) in the placebo group (risk difference, −5%; 95% CI, −13% to 3%; P = .26). Estimates were similar in per protocol analyses, imputation analyses, and preplanned subgroups. There were no statistically significant differences in any secondary outcome measures.</p> <p><b> Conclusions and Relevance</b> In this randomized clinical trial, daily d-mannose did not reduce the proportion of women with recurrent UTI in primary care who experienced a subsequent clinically suspected UTI. d-Mannose should not be recommended for prophylaxis in this patient group.</p> <p><b> Trial Registration</b> isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN13283516</p>