Long-term outcomes after stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of symptomatic carotid stenosis: the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS) randomised trial
<p><strong>Background</strong></p> <p>Stenting is an alternative to endarterectomy for treatment of carotid artery stenosis, but long-term efficacy is uncertain. We report long-term data from the randomised International Carotid Stenting Study comparison of these treatm...
| Hoofdauteurs: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Andere auteurs: | |
| Formaat: | Journal article |
| Taal: | English |
| Gepubliceerd in: |
Elsevier
2014
|
| _version_ | 1826264834125070336 |
|---|---|
| author | Bonati, L Dobson, J Featherstone, R Ederle, J Van Der Worp, H De Borst, G Mali, W Beard, J Cleveland, T Engelter, S Lyrer, P Ford, G Dorman, P Brown, M International Carotid Stenting Study investigators |
| author2 | Halliday, A |
| author_facet | Halliday, A Bonati, L Dobson, J Featherstone, R Ederle, J Van Der Worp, H De Borst, G Mali, W Beard, J Cleveland, T Engelter, S Lyrer, P Ford, G Dorman, P Brown, M International Carotid Stenting Study investigators |
| author_sort | Bonati, L |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | <p><strong>Background</strong></p> <p>Stenting is an alternative to endarterectomy for treatment of carotid artery stenosis, but long-term efficacy is uncertain. We report long-term data from the randomised International Carotid Stenting Study comparison of these treatments.</p> <p><strong>Methods</strong></p> <p>Patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis were randomly assigned 1:1 to open treatment with stenting or endarterectomy at 50 centres worldwide. Randomisation was computer generated centrally and allocated by telephone call or fax. Major outcomes were assessed by an independent endpoint committee unaware of treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was fatal or disabling stroke in any territory after randomisation to the end of follow-up. Analysis was by intention to treat ([ITT] all patients) and per protocol from 31 days after treatment (all patients in whom assigned treatment was completed). Functional ability was rated with the modified Rankin scale. This study is registered, number ISRCTN25337470.</p> <p><strong>Findings</strong></p> <p>1713 patients were assigned to stenting (n=855) or endarterectomy (n=858) and followed up for a median of 4·2 years (IQR 3·0–5·2, maximum 10·0). Three patients withdrew immediately and, therefore, the ITT population comprised 1710 patients. The number of fatal or disabling strokes (52 vs 49) and cumulative 5-year risk did not differ significantly between the stenting and endarterectomy groups (6·4% vs 6·5%; hazard ratio [HR] 1·06, 95% CI 0·72–1·57, p=0·77). Any stroke was more frequent in the stenting group than in the endarterectomy group (119 vs 72 events; ITT population, 5-year cumulative risk 15·2% vs 9·4%, HR 1·71, 95% CI 1·28–2·30, p<0·001; per-protocol population, 5-year cumulative risk 8·9% vs 5·8%, 1·53, 1·02–2·31, p=0·04), but were mainly non-disabling strokes. The distribution of modified Rankin scale scores at 1 year, 5 years, or final follow-up did not differ significantly between treatment groups.</p> <p><strong>Interpretation</strong></p> <p>Long-term functional outcome and risk of fatal or disabling stroke are similar for stenting and endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis.</p> <p><strong>Funding</strong></p> <p>Medical Research Council, Stroke Association, Sanofi-Synthélabo, European Union.</p> |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-06T20:14:15Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:2b9a5adb-4df4-436b-bde9-df4ea30286b1 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-06T20:14:15Z |
| publishDate | 2014 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:2b9a5adb-4df4-436b-bde9-df4ea30286b12022-03-26T12:31:56ZLong-term outcomes after stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of symptomatic carotid stenosis: the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS) randomised trialJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:2b9a5adb-4df4-436b-bde9-df4ea30286b1EnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordElsevier2014Bonati, LDobson, JFeatherstone, REderle, JVan Der Worp, HDe Borst, GMali, WBeard, JCleveland, TEngelter, SLyrer, PFord, GDorman, PBrown, MInternational Carotid Stenting Study investigatorsHalliday, A<p><strong>Background</strong></p> <p>Stenting is an alternative to endarterectomy for treatment of carotid artery stenosis, but long-term efficacy is uncertain. We report long-term data from the randomised International Carotid Stenting Study comparison of these treatments.</p> <p><strong>Methods</strong></p> <p>Patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis were randomly assigned 1:1 to open treatment with stenting or endarterectomy at 50 centres worldwide. Randomisation was computer generated centrally and allocated by telephone call or fax. Major outcomes were assessed by an independent endpoint committee unaware of treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was fatal or disabling stroke in any territory after randomisation to the end of follow-up. Analysis was by intention to treat ([ITT] all patients) and per protocol from 31 days after treatment (all patients in whom assigned treatment was completed). Functional ability was rated with the modified Rankin scale. This study is registered, number ISRCTN25337470.</p> <p><strong>Findings</strong></p> <p>1713 patients were assigned to stenting (n=855) or endarterectomy (n=858) and followed up for a median of 4·2 years (IQR 3·0–5·2, maximum 10·0). Three patients withdrew immediately and, therefore, the ITT population comprised 1710 patients. The number of fatal or disabling strokes (52 vs 49) and cumulative 5-year risk did not differ significantly between the stenting and endarterectomy groups (6·4% vs 6·5%; hazard ratio [HR] 1·06, 95% CI 0·72–1·57, p=0·77). Any stroke was more frequent in the stenting group than in the endarterectomy group (119 vs 72 events; ITT population, 5-year cumulative risk 15·2% vs 9·4%, HR 1·71, 95% CI 1·28–2·30, p<0·001; per-protocol population, 5-year cumulative risk 8·9% vs 5·8%, 1·53, 1·02–2·31, p=0·04), but were mainly non-disabling strokes. The distribution of modified Rankin scale scores at 1 year, 5 years, or final follow-up did not differ significantly between treatment groups.</p> <p><strong>Interpretation</strong></p> <p>Long-term functional outcome and risk of fatal or disabling stroke are similar for stenting and endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis.</p> <p><strong>Funding</strong></p> <p>Medical Research Council, Stroke Association, Sanofi-Synthélabo, European Union.</p> |
| spellingShingle | Bonati, L Dobson, J Featherstone, R Ederle, J Van Der Worp, H De Borst, G Mali, W Beard, J Cleveland, T Engelter, S Lyrer, P Ford, G Dorman, P Brown, M International Carotid Stenting Study investigators Long-term outcomes after stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of symptomatic carotid stenosis: the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS) randomised trial |
| title | Long-term outcomes after stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of symptomatic carotid stenosis: the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS) randomised trial |
| title_full | Long-term outcomes after stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of symptomatic carotid stenosis: the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS) randomised trial |
| title_fullStr | Long-term outcomes after stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of symptomatic carotid stenosis: the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS) randomised trial |
| title_full_unstemmed | Long-term outcomes after stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of symptomatic carotid stenosis: the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS) randomised trial |
| title_short | Long-term outcomes after stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of symptomatic carotid stenosis: the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS) randomised trial |
| title_sort | long term outcomes after stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of symptomatic carotid stenosis the international carotid stenting study icss randomised trial |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT bonatil longtermoutcomesafterstentingversusendarterectomyfortreatmentofsymptomaticcarotidstenosistheinternationalcarotidstentingstudyicssrandomisedtrial AT dobsonj longtermoutcomesafterstentingversusendarterectomyfortreatmentofsymptomaticcarotidstenosistheinternationalcarotidstentingstudyicssrandomisedtrial AT featherstoner longtermoutcomesafterstentingversusendarterectomyfortreatmentofsymptomaticcarotidstenosistheinternationalcarotidstentingstudyicssrandomisedtrial AT ederlej longtermoutcomesafterstentingversusendarterectomyfortreatmentofsymptomaticcarotidstenosistheinternationalcarotidstentingstudyicssrandomisedtrial AT vanderworph longtermoutcomesafterstentingversusendarterectomyfortreatmentofsymptomaticcarotidstenosistheinternationalcarotidstentingstudyicssrandomisedtrial AT deborstg longtermoutcomesafterstentingversusendarterectomyfortreatmentofsymptomaticcarotidstenosistheinternationalcarotidstentingstudyicssrandomisedtrial AT maliw longtermoutcomesafterstentingversusendarterectomyfortreatmentofsymptomaticcarotidstenosistheinternationalcarotidstentingstudyicssrandomisedtrial AT beardj longtermoutcomesafterstentingversusendarterectomyfortreatmentofsymptomaticcarotidstenosistheinternationalcarotidstentingstudyicssrandomisedtrial AT clevelandt longtermoutcomesafterstentingversusendarterectomyfortreatmentofsymptomaticcarotidstenosistheinternationalcarotidstentingstudyicssrandomisedtrial AT engelters longtermoutcomesafterstentingversusendarterectomyfortreatmentofsymptomaticcarotidstenosistheinternationalcarotidstentingstudyicssrandomisedtrial AT lyrerp longtermoutcomesafterstentingversusendarterectomyfortreatmentofsymptomaticcarotidstenosistheinternationalcarotidstentingstudyicssrandomisedtrial AT fordg longtermoutcomesafterstentingversusendarterectomyfortreatmentofsymptomaticcarotidstenosistheinternationalcarotidstentingstudyicssrandomisedtrial AT dormanp longtermoutcomesafterstentingversusendarterectomyfortreatmentofsymptomaticcarotidstenosistheinternationalcarotidstentingstudyicssrandomisedtrial AT brownm longtermoutcomesafterstentingversusendarterectomyfortreatmentofsymptomaticcarotidstenosistheinternationalcarotidstentingstudyicssrandomisedtrial AT internationalcarotidstentingstudyinvestigators longtermoutcomesafterstentingversusendarterectomyfortreatmentofsymptomaticcarotidstenosistheinternationalcarotidstentingstudyicssrandomisedtrial |