Evaluating the impact of population and high-risk strategies for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.

AIMS: To estimate the potential effectiveness of different "high-risk" and "population" approaches to the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in middle-aged British men, after correction for regression dilution bias. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used a combination of c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Emberson, J, Whincup, P, Morris, R, Walker, M, Ebrahim, S
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 2004
_version_ 1797060239573385216
author Emberson, J
Whincup, P
Morris, R
Walker, M
Ebrahim, S
author_facet Emberson, J
Whincup, P
Morris, R
Walker, M
Ebrahim, S
author_sort Emberson, J
collection OXFORD
description AIMS: To estimate the potential effectiveness of different "high-risk" and "population" approaches to the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in middle-aged British men, after correction for regression dilution bias. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used a combination of cohort and randomised controlled trial evidence to estimate the effectiveness of high-risk strategies, based on the identification of high-risk factors or high absolute risk, and strategies based on population-wide reductions in cholesterol and blood pressure. High-risk strategies were potentially effective but would need to be used widely to have a substantial effect on CVD in the population. Aggressive pharmacological treatment (using statins, beta-blockers, ACE-inhibitors and aspirin) in individuals with a 10-year Framingham event risk of >or=30% (6% of population) would have reduced major CVD by at most 11%. This figure increased to 34% at a >or=20% treatment threshold (26% of population). In contrast, modest downwards shifts in the population distributions of serum total cholesterol and systolic blood pressure led to marked expected reductions in major CVD. Taking regression dilution bias into account, 10% reductions in long-term mean blood cholesterol and blood pressure could have reduced major CVD by 45%. CONCLUSIONS: If high-risk strategies are to have a major impact on CVD in the population, they need to be more widely used than previously envisaged. Population-wide reduction of major risk factors is needed if CVD is to be substantially reduced.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T20:14:33Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:2bb34c2e-d8a5-418a-af5a-835d9ba84db4
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T20:14:33Z
publishDate 2004
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:2bb34c2e-d8a5-418a-af5a-835d9ba84db42022-03-26T12:32:29ZEvaluating the impact of population and high-risk strategies for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:2bb34c2e-d8a5-418a-af5a-835d9ba84db4EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2004Emberson, JWhincup, PMorris, RWalker, MEbrahim, S AIMS: To estimate the potential effectiveness of different "high-risk" and "population" approaches to the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in middle-aged British men, after correction for regression dilution bias. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used a combination of cohort and randomised controlled trial evidence to estimate the effectiveness of high-risk strategies, based on the identification of high-risk factors or high absolute risk, and strategies based on population-wide reductions in cholesterol and blood pressure. High-risk strategies were potentially effective but would need to be used widely to have a substantial effect on CVD in the population. Aggressive pharmacological treatment (using statins, beta-blockers, ACE-inhibitors and aspirin) in individuals with a 10-year Framingham event risk of >or=30% (6% of population) would have reduced major CVD by at most 11%. This figure increased to 34% at a >or=20% treatment threshold (26% of population). In contrast, modest downwards shifts in the population distributions of serum total cholesterol and systolic blood pressure led to marked expected reductions in major CVD. Taking regression dilution bias into account, 10% reductions in long-term mean blood cholesterol and blood pressure could have reduced major CVD by 45%. CONCLUSIONS: If high-risk strategies are to have a major impact on CVD in the population, they need to be more widely used than previously envisaged. Population-wide reduction of major risk factors is needed if CVD is to be substantially reduced.
spellingShingle Emberson, J
Whincup, P
Morris, R
Walker, M
Ebrahim, S
Evaluating the impact of population and high-risk strategies for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.
title Evaluating the impact of population and high-risk strategies for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.
title_full Evaluating the impact of population and high-risk strategies for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.
title_fullStr Evaluating the impact of population and high-risk strategies for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the impact of population and high-risk strategies for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.
title_short Evaluating the impact of population and high-risk strategies for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.
title_sort evaluating the impact of population and high risk strategies for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease
work_keys_str_mv AT embersonj evaluatingtheimpactofpopulationandhighriskstrategiesfortheprimarypreventionofcardiovasculardisease
AT whincupp evaluatingtheimpactofpopulationandhighriskstrategiesfortheprimarypreventionofcardiovasculardisease
AT morrisr evaluatingtheimpactofpopulationandhighriskstrategiesfortheprimarypreventionofcardiovasculardisease
AT walkerm evaluatingtheimpactofpopulationandhighriskstrategiesfortheprimarypreventionofcardiovasculardisease
AT ebrahims evaluatingtheimpactofpopulationandhighriskstrategiesfortheprimarypreventionofcardiovasculardisease