Wrongs and faults

This chapter begins with a discussion of 'the elementary moral distinction'. It then considers lives and wrongs, people and faults, fault-anticipating wrongs, and the fault principle. It argues that moral philosophy has lost sight of the need to rely on the deservedness of punishment to ex...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gardner, J
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Oxford University Press 2005
_version_ 1826264911796240384
author Gardner, J
author_facet Gardner, J
author_sort Gardner, J
collection OXFORD
description This chapter begins with a discussion of 'the elementary moral distinction'. It then considers lives and wrongs, people and faults, fault-anticipating wrongs, and the fault principle. It argues that moral philosophy has lost sight of the need to rely on the deservedness of punishment to explain punishment's meanings and consequences. In the process it has lost sight of the need to explain, in a way that does not depend on punishment's meanings or consequences, why the only actions that deserve to be punished are both wrongful and blameworthy (two different and only very obliquely related properties).
first_indexed 2024-03-06T20:15:27Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:2bfdeee7-9e79-4f73-a132-02cbd12ac37a
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T20:15:27Z
publishDate 2005
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:2bfdeee7-9e79-4f73-a132-02cbd12ac37a2022-03-26T12:34:18ZWrongs and faultsJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:2bfdeee7-9e79-4f73-a132-02cbd12ac37aEnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordOxford University Press2005Gardner, JThis chapter begins with a discussion of 'the elementary moral distinction'. It then considers lives and wrongs, people and faults, fault-anticipating wrongs, and the fault principle. It argues that moral philosophy has lost sight of the need to rely on the deservedness of punishment to explain punishment's meanings and consequences. In the process it has lost sight of the need to explain, in a way that does not depend on punishment's meanings or consequences, why the only actions that deserve to be punished are both wrongful and blameworthy (two different and only very obliquely related properties).
spellingShingle Gardner, J
Wrongs and faults
title Wrongs and faults
title_full Wrongs and faults
title_fullStr Wrongs and faults
title_full_unstemmed Wrongs and faults
title_short Wrongs and faults
title_sort wrongs and faults
work_keys_str_mv AT gardnerj wrongsandfaults