Systematic review and meta-analysis of the relationship between the heartbeat-evoked potential and interoception
The Heartbeat Evoked Potential (HEP) has been proposed as a neurophysiological marker of interoceptive processing. Despite its use to validate interoceptive measures and to assess interoceptive functioning in clinical groups, the empirical evidence for a relationship between HEP amplitude and intero...
| المؤلفون الرئيسيون: | , , , |
|---|---|
| التنسيق: | Journal article |
| اللغة: | English |
| منشور في: |
Elsevier
2021
|
| _version_ | 1826264939131568128 |
|---|---|
| author | Coll, M-P Hobson, H Bird, G Murphy, J |
| author_facet | Coll, M-P Hobson, H Bird, G Murphy, J |
| author_sort | Coll, M-P |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | The Heartbeat Evoked Potential (HEP) has been proposed as a neurophysiological marker of interoceptive processing. Despite its use to validate interoceptive measures and to assess interoceptive functioning in clinical groups, the empirical evidence for a relationship between HEP amplitude and interoceptive processing, including measures of such processing, is scattered across several studies with varied designs. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine the body of HEP-interoception research, and consider the associations the HEP shows with various direct and indirect measures of interoception, and how it is affected by manipulations of interoceptive processing. Specifically, we assessed the effect on HEP amplitude of manipulating attention to the heartbeat; manipulating participants’ arousal; the association between the HEP and behavioural measures of cardiac interoception; and comparisons between healthy and clinical groups. Following database searches and screening, 45 studies were included in the systematic review and 42 in the meta-analyses. We noted variations in the ways individual studies have attempted to address key confounds, particularly the cardiac field artefact. Meta-analytic summaries indicated there were moderate to large effects of attention, arousal, and clinical status on the HEP, and a moderate association between HEP amplitude and behavioural measures of interoception. Problematically, the reliability of the meta-analytic effects documented here remain unknown, given the lack of standardised protocols for measuring the HEP. Thus, it is possible effects are driven by confounds such as cardiac factors or somatosensory effects. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-06T20:15:50Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:2c1cfc4c-a102-4503-af4c-0bad1102bebf |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-06T20:15:50Z |
| publishDate | 2021 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:2c1cfc4c-a102-4503-af4c-0bad1102bebf2022-03-26T12:35:04ZSystematic review and meta-analysis of the relationship between the heartbeat-evoked potential and interoceptionJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:2c1cfc4c-a102-4503-af4c-0bad1102bebfEnglishSymplectic ElementsElsevier2021Coll, M-PHobson, HBird, GMurphy, JThe Heartbeat Evoked Potential (HEP) has been proposed as a neurophysiological marker of interoceptive processing. Despite its use to validate interoceptive measures and to assess interoceptive functioning in clinical groups, the empirical evidence for a relationship between HEP amplitude and interoceptive processing, including measures of such processing, is scattered across several studies with varied designs. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine the body of HEP-interoception research, and consider the associations the HEP shows with various direct and indirect measures of interoception, and how it is affected by manipulations of interoceptive processing. Specifically, we assessed the effect on HEP amplitude of manipulating attention to the heartbeat; manipulating participants’ arousal; the association between the HEP and behavioural measures of cardiac interoception; and comparisons between healthy and clinical groups. Following database searches and screening, 45 studies were included in the systematic review and 42 in the meta-analyses. We noted variations in the ways individual studies have attempted to address key confounds, particularly the cardiac field artefact. Meta-analytic summaries indicated there were moderate to large effects of attention, arousal, and clinical status on the HEP, and a moderate association between HEP amplitude and behavioural measures of interoception. Problematically, the reliability of the meta-analytic effects documented here remain unknown, given the lack of standardised protocols for measuring the HEP. Thus, it is possible effects are driven by confounds such as cardiac factors or somatosensory effects. |
| spellingShingle | Coll, M-P Hobson, H Bird, G Murphy, J Systematic review and meta-analysis of the relationship between the heartbeat-evoked potential and interoception |
| title | Systematic review and meta-analysis of the relationship between the heartbeat-evoked potential and interoception |
| title_full | Systematic review and meta-analysis of the relationship between the heartbeat-evoked potential and interoception |
| title_fullStr | Systematic review and meta-analysis of the relationship between the heartbeat-evoked potential and interoception |
| title_full_unstemmed | Systematic review and meta-analysis of the relationship between the heartbeat-evoked potential and interoception |
| title_short | Systematic review and meta-analysis of the relationship between the heartbeat-evoked potential and interoception |
| title_sort | systematic review and meta analysis of the relationship between the heartbeat evoked potential and interoception |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT collmp systematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftherelationshipbetweentheheartbeatevokedpotentialandinteroception AT hobsonh systematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftherelationshipbetweentheheartbeatevokedpotentialandinteroception AT birdg systematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftherelationshipbetweentheheartbeatevokedpotentialandinteroception AT murphyj systematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftherelationshipbetweentheheartbeatevokedpotentialandinteroception |