The scientific study of consciousness cannot and should not be morally neutral
A target question for the scientific study of consciousness is how dimensions of consciousness, such as the ability to feel pain and pleasure or reflect on one’s own experience, vary in different states and animal species. Considering the tight link between consciousness and moral status, answers to...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
SAGE Publications
2022
|
| _version_ | 1824458773152923648 |
|---|---|
| author | Mazor, M Brown, S Ciaunica, A Demertzi, A Fahrenfort, J Faivre, N Francken, JC Lamy, D Lenggenhager, B Moutoussis, M Nizzi, M-C Salomon, R Soto, D Stein, T Lubianiker, N |
| author_facet | Mazor, M Brown, S Ciaunica, A Demertzi, A Fahrenfort, J Faivre, N Francken, JC Lamy, D Lenggenhager, B Moutoussis, M Nizzi, M-C Salomon, R Soto, D Stein, T Lubianiker, N |
| author_sort | Mazor, M |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | A target question for the scientific study of consciousness is how dimensions of consciousness, such as the ability to feel pain and pleasure or reflect on one’s own experience, vary in different states and animal species. Considering the tight link between consciousness and moral status, answers to these questions have implications for law and ethics. Here we point out that given this link, the scientific community studying consciousness may face implicit pressure to carry out certain research programs or interpret results in ways that justify current norms rather than challenge them. We show that because consciousness largely determines moral status, the use of nonhuman animals in the scientific study of consciousness introduces a direct conflict between scientific relevance and ethics—the more scientifically valuable an animal model is for studying consciousness, the more difficult it becomes to ethically justify compromises to its well-being for consciousness research. Finally, in light of these considerations, we call for a discussion of the immediate ethical corollaries of the body of knowledge that has accumulated and for a more explicit consideration of the role of ideology and ethics in the scientific study of consciousness. |
| first_indexed | 2025-02-19T04:31:13Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:2d5e05e5-e293-447f-938c-cb6eb3eeda61 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2025-02-19T04:31:13Z |
| publishDate | 2022 |
| publisher | SAGE Publications |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:2d5e05e5-e293-447f-938c-cb6eb3eeda612025-01-07T13:28:08ZThe scientific study of consciousness cannot and should not be morally neutralJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:2d5e05e5-e293-447f-938c-cb6eb3eeda61EnglishSymplectic ElementsSAGE Publications2022Mazor, MBrown, SCiaunica, ADemertzi, AFahrenfort, JFaivre, NFrancken, JCLamy, DLenggenhager, BMoutoussis, MNizzi, M-CSalomon, RSoto, DStein, TLubianiker, NA target question for the scientific study of consciousness is how dimensions of consciousness, such as the ability to feel pain and pleasure or reflect on one’s own experience, vary in different states and animal species. Considering the tight link between consciousness and moral status, answers to these questions have implications for law and ethics. Here we point out that given this link, the scientific community studying consciousness may face implicit pressure to carry out certain research programs or interpret results in ways that justify current norms rather than challenge them. We show that because consciousness largely determines moral status, the use of nonhuman animals in the scientific study of consciousness introduces a direct conflict between scientific relevance and ethics—the more scientifically valuable an animal model is for studying consciousness, the more difficult it becomes to ethically justify compromises to its well-being for consciousness research. Finally, in light of these considerations, we call for a discussion of the immediate ethical corollaries of the body of knowledge that has accumulated and for a more explicit consideration of the role of ideology and ethics in the scientific study of consciousness. |
| spellingShingle | Mazor, M Brown, S Ciaunica, A Demertzi, A Fahrenfort, J Faivre, N Francken, JC Lamy, D Lenggenhager, B Moutoussis, M Nizzi, M-C Salomon, R Soto, D Stein, T Lubianiker, N The scientific study of consciousness cannot and should not be morally neutral |
| title | The scientific study of consciousness cannot and should not be morally neutral |
| title_full | The scientific study of consciousness cannot and should not be morally neutral |
| title_fullStr | The scientific study of consciousness cannot and should not be morally neutral |
| title_full_unstemmed | The scientific study of consciousness cannot and should not be morally neutral |
| title_short | The scientific study of consciousness cannot and should not be morally neutral |
| title_sort | scientific study of consciousness cannot and should not be morally neutral |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mazorm thescientificstudyofconsciousnesscannotandshouldnotbemorallyneutral AT browns thescientificstudyofconsciousnesscannotandshouldnotbemorallyneutral AT ciaunicaa thescientificstudyofconsciousnesscannotandshouldnotbemorallyneutral AT demertzia thescientificstudyofconsciousnesscannotandshouldnotbemorallyneutral AT fahrenfortj thescientificstudyofconsciousnesscannotandshouldnotbemorallyneutral AT faivren thescientificstudyofconsciousnesscannotandshouldnotbemorallyneutral AT franckenjc thescientificstudyofconsciousnesscannotandshouldnotbemorallyneutral AT lamyd thescientificstudyofconsciousnesscannotandshouldnotbemorallyneutral AT lenggenhagerb thescientificstudyofconsciousnesscannotandshouldnotbemorallyneutral AT moutoussism thescientificstudyofconsciousnesscannotandshouldnotbemorallyneutral AT nizzimc thescientificstudyofconsciousnesscannotandshouldnotbemorallyneutral AT salomonr thescientificstudyofconsciousnesscannotandshouldnotbemorallyneutral AT sotod thescientificstudyofconsciousnesscannotandshouldnotbemorallyneutral AT steint thescientificstudyofconsciousnesscannotandshouldnotbemorallyneutral AT lubianikern thescientificstudyofconsciousnesscannotandshouldnotbemorallyneutral AT mazorm scientificstudyofconsciousnesscannotandshouldnotbemorallyneutral AT browns scientificstudyofconsciousnesscannotandshouldnotbemorallyneutral AT ciaunicaa scientificstudyofconsciousnesscannotandshouldnotbemorallyneutral AT demertzia scientificstudyofconsciousnesscannotandshouldnotbemorallyneutral AT fahrenfortj scientificstudyofconsciousnesscannotandshouldnotbemorallyneutral AT faivren scientificstudyofconsciousnesscannotandshouldnotbemorallyneutral AT franckenjc scientificstudyofconsciousnesscannotandshouldnotbemorallyneutral AT lamyd scientificstudyofconsciousnesscannotandshouldnotbemorallyneutral AT lenggenhagerb scientificstudyofconsciousnesscannotandshouldnotbemorallyneutral AT moutoussism scientificstudyofconsciousnesscannotandshouldnotbemorallyneutral AT nizzimc scientificstudyofconsciousnesscannotandshouldnotbemorallyneutral AT salomonr scientificstudyofconsciousnesscannotandshouldnotbemorallyneutral AT sotod scientificstudyofconsciousnesscannotandshouldnotbemorallyneutral AT steint scientificstudyofconsciousnesscannotandshouldnotbemorallyneutral AT lubianikern scientificstudyofconsciousnesscannotandshouldnotbemorallyneutral |