Underpowered: electricity policy and the state in India, 1991-2014
<p>How has the Indian state changed with economic liberalization? While many scholars have explored the altered party politics and class basis of the liberalization-era state, few have studied its transforming internal organizational forms and functioning. This thesis aims to provide an empiri...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Thesis |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2015
|
| Subjects: |
| _version_ | 1817932504197234688 |
|---|---|
| author | Chatterjee, E Elizabeth Mary Chatterjee |
| author2 | Harriss-White, B |
| author_facet | Harriss-White, B Chatterjee, E Elizabeth Mary Chatterjee |
| author_sort | Chatterjee, E |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | <p>How has the Indian state changed with economic liberalization? While many scholars have explored the altered party politics and class basis of the liberalization-era state, few have studied its transforming internal organizational forms and functioning. This thesis aims to provide an empirically grounded answer to this question. To do this it uses the lens of electricity: the sector lies at the heart of contemporary capital accumulation, state power, and distributive politics, and has witnessed almost a quarter-century of institutional reforms since 1991.</p> <p>In the sector, new or reworked organizational forms—such as imported regulatory agencies, corporatized state-owned enterprises, and public-private partnerships—have been grafted onto the older statist system in a process of <em>institutional layering</em>. Favouring state-business collaboration and prioritizing rapid economic growth, this mode of state operation is distinct both from a liberal, market-oriented state and from India’s older state-led mode. It combines state intervention and selective adoption of parts of the Washington Consensus template to produce a reinvented mode of power governance that I term <em>state capitalism 2.0.</em></p> <p>India’s new state-market hybrid is not a functional alternative to the older models, however. The layered process through which it has emerged means that it is <em>distinctively dysfunctional</em>. Organizations have emerged in an ad hoc fashion, each shaped and reshaped by multiple collective interests, while existing organizations are rarely destroyed. The resulting layered amalgam institutionalizes contradictory state strategies, co-optation by competing interest groups, and a dualistic system of services and subsidies. Consequently the sector’s performance remains poor.</p> <p>As a result, developments in the Indian power sector suggest that the state's 'pro-business' transition has been painful and incomplete. At least in this sector, the Indian state remains simultaneously more indispensable, more ambivalently pro-business, and more chaotic than much theory might suggest.</p> |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-06T20:20:22Z |
| format | Thesis |
| id | oxford-uuid:2d97e1ca-b31c-4dc3-a0c8-6352c95280c1 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-09T03:38:58Z |
| publishDate | 2015 |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:2d97e1ca-b31c-4dc3-a0c8-6352c95280c12024-12-07T10:44:15ZUnderpowered: electricity policy and the state in India, 1991-2014Thesishttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06uuid:2d97e1ca-b31c-4dc3-a0c8-6352c95280c1Public administrationPolitical economy of markets and statesPublic policyAsiaEnglishOxford University Research Archive - Valet2015Chatterjee, EElizabeth Mary ChatterjeeHarriss-White, B<p>How has the Indian state changed with economic liberalization? While many scholars have explored the altered party politics and class basis of the liberalization-era state, few have studied its transforming internal organizational forms and functioning. This thesis aims to provide an empirically grounded answer to this question. To do this it uses the lens of electricity: the sector lies at the heart of contemporary capital accumulation, state power, and distributive politics, and has witnessed almost a quarter-century of institutional reforms since 1991.</p> <p>In the sector, new or reworked organizational forms—such as imported regulatory agencies, corporatized state-owned enterprises, and public-private partnerships—have been grafted onto the older statist system in a process of <em>institutional layering</em>. Favouring state-business collaboration and prioritizing rapid economic growth, this mode of state operation is distinct both from a liberal, market-oriented state and from India’s older state-led mode. It combines state intervention and selective adoption of parts of the Washington Consensus template to produce a reinvented mode of power governance that I term <em>state capitalism 2.0.</em></p> <p>India’s new state-market hybrid is not a functional alternative to the older models, however. The layered process through which it has emerged means that it is <em>distinctively dysfunctional</em>. Organizations have emerged in an ad hoc fashion, each shaped and reshaped by multiple collective interests, while existing organizations are rarely destroyed. The resulting layered amalgam institutionalizes contradictory state strategies, co-optation by competing interest groups, and a dualistic system of services and subsidies. Consequently the sector’s performance remains poor.</p> <p>As a result, developments in the Indian power sector suggest that the state's 'pro-business' transition has been painful and incomplete. At least in this sector, the Indian state remains simultaneously more indispensable, more ambivalently pro-business, and more chaotic than much theory might suggest.</p> |
| spellingShingle | Public administration Political economy of markets and states Public policy Asia Chatterjee, E Elizabeth Mary Chatterjee Underpowered: electricity policy and the state in India, 1991-2014 |
| title | Underpowered: electricity policy and the state in India, 1991-2014 |
| title_full | Underpowered: electricity policy and the state in India, 1991-2014 |
| title_fullStr | Underpowered: electricity policy and the state in India, 1991-2014 |
| title_full_unstemmed | Underpowered: electricity policy and the state in India, 1991-2014 |
| title_short | Underpowered: electricity policy and the state in India, 1991-2014 |
| title_sort | underpowered electricity policy and the state in india 1991 2014 |
| topic | Public administration Political economy of markets and states Public policy Asia |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT chatterjeee underpoweredelectricitypolicyandthestateinindia19912014 AT elizabethmarychatterjee underpoweredelectricitypolicyandthestateinindia19912014 |