Agreed statistics: measurement method comparison.
Statistical Methods for Assessing Agreement between Two Methods of Clinical Measurement. By J. Martin Bland, Douglas G. Altman. Lancet 1986; 1(8476):307-10. Abstract reprinted with permission of Elsevier, copyright 1986. In clinical measurement comparison of a new measurement technique with an estab...
| Päätekijät: | , |
|---|---|
| Aineistotyyppi: | Journal article |
| Kieli: | English |
| Julkaistu: |
2012
|
| _version_ | 1826265502981292032 |
|---|---|
| author | Bland, J Altman, D |
| author_facet | Bland, J Altman, D |
| author_sort | Bland, J |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | Statistical Methods for Assessing Agreement between Two Methods of Clinical Measurement. By J. Martin Bland, Douglas G. Altman. Lancet 1986; 1(8476):307-10. Abstract reprinted with permission of Elsevier, copyright 1986. In clinical measurement comparison of a new measurement technique with an established one is often needed to see whether they agree sufficiently for the new to replace the old. Such investigations are often analyzed inappropriately, notably by using correlation coefficients. The use of correlation is misleading. An alternative approach, based on graphical techniques and simple calculations, is described, together with the relation between this analysis and the assessment of repeatability. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-06T20:24:42Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:2f02e51d-47aa-4be0-887d-e4bd1dee1bf9 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-06T20:24:42Z |
| publishDate | 2012 |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:2f02e51d-47aa-4be0-887d-e4bd1dee1bf92022-03-26T12:52:30ZAgreed statistics: measurement method comparison.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:2f02e51d-47aa-4be0-887d-e4bd1dee1bf9EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2012Bland, JAltman, DStatistical Methods for Assessing Agreement between Two Methods of Clinical Measurement. By J. Martin Bland, Douglas G. Altman. Lancet 1986; 1(8476):307-10. Abstract reprinted with permission of Elsevier, copyright 1986. In clinical measurement comparison of a new measurement technique with an established one is often needed to see whether they agree sufficiently for the new to replace the old. Such investigations are often analyzed inappropriately, notably by using correlation coefficients. The use of correlation is misleading. An alternative approach, based on graphical techniques and simple calculations, is described, together with the relation between this analysis and the assessment of repeatability. |
| spellingShingle | Bland, J Altman, D Agreed statistics: measurement method comparison. |
| title | Agreed statistics: measurement method comparison. |
| title_full | Agreed statistics: measurement method comparison. |
| title_fullStr | Agreed statistics: measurement method comparison. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Agreed statistics: measurement method comparison. |
| title_short | Agreed statistics: measurement method comparison. |
| title_sort | agreed statistics measurement method comparison |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT blandj agreedstatisticsmeasurementmethodcomparison AT altmand agreedstatisticsmeasurementmethodcomparison |