Closing the translation gap for justice requirements in international research
Bioethicists have long debated the content of sponsors and researchers? obligations of justice in international clinical research. However, there has been little empirical investigation as to whether and how obligations of responsiveness, ancillary care, post-trial benefits and research capacity str...
Principais autores: | Pratt, B, Zion, D, Lwin, K, Cheah, P, Nosten, F, Loff, B |
---|---|
Formato: | Journal article |
Idioma: | English |
Publicado em: |
2012
|
Registros relacionados
-
Closing the translation gap for justice requirements in international research.
por: Pratt, B, et al.
Publicado em: (2012) -
Linking international clinical research with stateless populations to justice in global health.
por: Pratt, B, et al.
Publicado em: (2014) -
Ancillary Care: From Theory to Practice in International Clinical Research.
por: Pratt, B, et al.
Publicado em: (2013) -
Exploitation and community engagement: Can Community Advisory Boards successfully assume a role minimising exploitation in international research?
por: Pratt, B, et al.
Publicado em: (2013) -
CLOSING THE GAP: REQUIREMENT OF A CONCEPTUAL MODEL
por: Resmi Pillai, et al.
Publicado em: (2002-01-01)