Association between the intact foreskin and inferior standards of male genital hygiene behaviour: a cross-sectional study.

This study was undertaken to determine whether non-circumcised men have inferior standards of genital hygiene behaviour, as measured by reported washing of the whole penis, compared with circumcised men. Male attenders at a sexually transmitted infections (STI) clinic at Ealing Hospital, London had...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: O'Farrell, N, Quigley, M, Fox, P
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 2005
_version_ 1797061227897159680
author O'Farrell, N
Quigley, M
Fox, P
author_facet O'Farrell, N
Quigley, M
Fox, P
author_sort O'Farrell, N
collection OXFORD
description This study was undertaken to determine whether non-circumcised men have inferior standards of genital hygiene behaviour, as measured by reported washing of the whole penis, compared with circumcised men. Male attenders at a sexually transmitted infections (STI) clinic at Ealing Hospital, London had routine STI tests and examinations performed and were asked about the frequency and thoroughness of genital washing. One hundred and fifty non-circumcised and 75 circumcised men were enrolled. Not always washing the whole penis, including retracting the foreskin in non-circumcised men every time they washed (defined as inferior genital hygiene behaviour) was more common in non-circumcised (26%) than circumcised men (4%) (crude odds ratio = 8.43, 95% confidence interval: 2.51-28.3, P<0.001) and those with balanitis (42% and 5%, P=0.036). Circumcised men were more likely than non-circumcised men to wash the genital area more than once a day (37% and 19%, P=0.011). Studies investigating the relationship between male circumcision status and other outcomes, for example HIV infection, should include assessment of genital hygiene.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T20:28:04Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:3011684b-3271-433c-b139-f1e2f0550bbf
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T20:28:04Z
publishDate 2005
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:3011684b-3271-433c-b139-f1e2f0550bbf2022-03-26T12:59:22ZAssociation between the intact foreskin and inferior standards of male genital hygiene behaviour: a cross-sectional study.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:3011684b-3271-433c-b139-f1e2f0550bbfEnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2005O'Farrell, NQuigley, MFox, PThis study was undertaken to determine whether non-circumcised men have inferior standards of genital hygiene behaviour, as measured by reported washing of the whole penis, compared with circumcised men. Male attenders at a sexually transmitted infections (STI) clinic at Ealing Hospital, London had routine STI tests and examinations performed and were asked about the frequency and thoroughness of genital washing. One hundred and fifty non-circumcised and 75 circumcised men were enrolled. Not always washing the whole penis, including retracting the foreskin in non-circumcised men every time they washed (defined as inferior genital hygiene behaviour) was more common in non-circumcised (26%) than circumcised men (4%) (crude odds ratio = 8.43, 95% confidence interval: 2.51-28.3, P<0.001) and those with balanitis (42% and 5%, P=0.036). Circumcised men were more likely than non-circumcised men to wash the genital area more than once a day (37% and 19%, P=0.011). Studies investigating the relationship between male circumcision status and other outcomes, for example HIV infection, should include assessment of genital hygiene.
spellingShingle O'Farrell, N
Quigley, M
Fox, P
Association between the intact foreskin and inferior standards of male genital hygiene behaviour: a cross-sectional study.
title Association between the intact foreskin and inferior standards of male genital hygiene behaviour: a cross-sectional study.
title_full Association between the intact foreskin and inferior standards of male genital hygiene behaviour: a cross-sectional study.
title_fullStr Association between the intact foreskin and inferior standards of male genital hygiene behaviour: a cross-sectional study.
title_full_unstemmed Association between the intact foreskin and inferior standards of male genital hygiene behaviour: a cross-sectional study.
title_short Association between the intact foreskin and inferior standards of male genital hygiene behaviour: a cross-sectional study.
title_sort association between the intact foreskin and inferior standards of male genital hygiene behaviour a cross sectional study
work_keys_str_mv AT ofarrelln associationbetweentheintactforeskinandinferiorstandardsofmalegenitalhygienebehaviouracrosssectionalstudy
AT quigleym associationbetweentheintactforeskinandinferiorstandardsofmalegenitalhygienebehaviouracrosssectionalstudy
AT foxp associationbetweentheintactforeskinandinferiorstandardsofmalegenitalhygienebehaviouracrosssectionalstudy