If at first you dont succeed: An experimental investigation of the impact of repetition options on corporate takeovers and the provision of public goods

This paper models, and experimentally simulates, the free-rider problem in a takeover when the raider has the option to “resolicit,” that is, to make a new offer after an offer has been rejected. In theory, the option to resolicit, by lowering offer credibility, increases the dissipative losses asso...

Descrición completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Main Authors: Noe, T, Gillette, A
Formato: Journal article
Publicado: 2006
_version_ 1826265736851488768
author Noe, T
Gillette, A
author_facet Noe, T
Gillette, A
author_sort Noe, T
collection OXFORD
description This paper models, and experimentally simulates, the free-rider problem in a takeover when the raider has the option to “resolicit,” that is, to make a new offer after an offer has been rejected. In theory, the option to resolicit, by lowering offer credibility, increases the dissipative losses associated with free riding. In practice, the outcomes of our experiment, while quite closely tracking theory in the effective absence of an option to resolicit, differed dramatically from theory when a significant probability of resolicitation was introduced: The option to resolicit reduced the costs of free riding fairly substantially. Both the raider offers and the shareholder tendering responses generally exceeded equilibrium predictions.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T20:28:20Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:302c60be-4c90-49a0-934d-a3d52a121fec
institution University of Oxford
last_indexed 2024-03-06T20:28:20Z
publishDate 2006
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:302c60be-4c90-49a0-934d-a3d52a121fec2022-03-26T12:59:53ZIf at first you dont succeed: An experimental investigation of the impact of repetition options on corporate takeovers and the provision of public goodsJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:302c60be-4c90-49a0-934d-a3d52a121fecSaïd Business School - Eureka2006Noe, TGillette, AThis paper models, and experimentally simulates, the free-rider problem in a takeover when the raider has the option to “resolicit,” that is, to make a new offer after an offer has been rejected. In theory, the option to resolicit, by lowering offer credibility, increases the dissipative losses associated with free riding. In practice, the outcomes of our experiment, while quite closely tracking theory in the effective absence of an option to resolicit, differed dramatically from theory when a significant probability of resolicitation was introduced: The option to resolicit reduced the costs of free riding fairly substantially. Both the raider offers and the shareholder tendering responses generally exceeded equilibrium predictions.
spellingShingle Noe, T
Gillette, A
If at first you dont succeed: An experimental investigation of the impact of repetition options on corporate takeovers and the provision of public goods
title If at first you dont succeed: An experimental investigation of the impact of repetition options on corporate takeovers and the provision of public goods
title_full If at first you dont succeed: An experimental investigation of the impact of repetition options on corporate takeovers and the provision of public goods
title_fullStr If at first you dont succeed: An experimental investigation of the impact of repetition options on corporate takeovers and the provision of public goods
title_full_unstemmed If at first you dont succeed: An experimental investigation of the impact of repetition options on corporate takeovers and the provision of public goods
title_short If at first you dont succeed: An experimental investigation of the impact of repetition options on corporate takeovers and the provision of public goods
title_sort if at first you dont succeed an experimental investigation of the impact of repetition options on corporate takeovers and the provision of public goods
work_keys_str_mv AT noet ifatfirstyoudontsucceedanexperimentalinvestigationoftheimpactofrepetitionoptionsoncorporatetakeoversandtheprovisionofpublicgoods
AT gillettea ifatfirstyoudontsucceedanexperimentalinvestigationoftheimpactofrepetitionoptionsoncorporatetakeoversandtheprovisionofpublicgoods