(When) is adblocking wrong?
In this chapter, the author examines three deontological objections to adblocking: the objection from property (according to which adblocking involves accessing another’s property without satisfying the conditions placed on such access by the owner); the objection from complicity (according to which...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Book section |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
| _version_ | 1797108769078902784 |
|---|---|
| author | Douglas, T |
| author2 | Véliz, C |
| author_facet | Véliz, C Douglas, T |
| author_sort | Douglas, T |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | In this chapter, the author examines three deontological objections to adblocking: the objection from property (according to which adblocking involves accessing another’s property without satisfying the conditions placed on such access by the owner); the objection from complicity (according to which, by blocking ads, consumers become complicit in the wrongdoing of adblocking software providers); and the objection from free-riding (according to which adblocking consumers free-ride on other consumers who allow ads to be served). The chapter argues that, though these objections plausibly establish the moral impermissibility of some instances of adblocking, they do not, even collectively, establish a blanket moral prohibition on adblocking, as it is currently done. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T07:33:03Z |
| format | Book section |
| id | oxford-uuid:30802077-13a2-47c1-9bde-769e1249d9e0 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T07:33:03Z |
| publishDate | 2022 |
| publisher | Oxford University Press |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:30802077-13a2-47c1-9bde-769e1249d9e02023-02-14T17:21:35Z(When) is adblocking wrong?Book sectionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843uuid:30802077-13a2-47c1-9bde-769e1249d9e0EnglishSymplectic ElementsOxford University Press2022Douglas, TVéliz, CIn this chapter, the author examines three deontological objections to adblocking: the objection from property (according to which adblocking involves accessing another’s property without satisfying the conditions placed on such access by the owner); the objection from complicity (according to which, by blocking ads, consumers become complicit in the wrongdoing of adblocking software providers); and the objection from free-riding (according to which adblocking consumers free-ride on other consumers who allow ads to be served). The chapter argues that, though these objections plausibly establish the moral impermissibility of some instances of adblocking, they do not, even collectively, establish a blanket moral prohibition on adblocking, as it is currently done. |
| spellingShingle | Douglas, T (When) is adblocking wrong? |
| title | (When) is adblocking wrong? |
| title_full | (When) is adblocking wrong? |
| title_fullStr | (When) is adblocking wrong? |
| title_full_unstemmed | (When) is adblocking wrong? |
| title_short | (When) is adblocking wrong? |
| title_sort | when is adblocking wrong |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT douglast whenisadblockingwrong |