How health-related quality of life assessment should be used in advanced colorectal cancer clinical trials

Traditionally, the efficacy of cancer treatment in patients with advance or metastatic disease in clinical studies has been studied using overall survival and more recently tumor-based end points such as progression-free survival, measurements of response to treatment. However, these seem not to be...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bonnetain, F, Borg, C, Adams, R, Ajani, J, Benson, A, Bleiberg, H, Chibaudel, B, Diaz-Rubio, E, Douillard, J, Fuchs, C, Giantonio, B, Goldberg, R, Heinemann, V, Koopman, M, Labianca, R, Larsen, A, Maughan, T, Mitchell, E, Peeters, M, Punt, C, Schmoll, H, Tournigand, C, De Gramont, A
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Oxford University Press 2017
_version_ 1826265829479546880
author Bonnetain, F
Borg, C
Adams, R
Ajani, J
Benson, A
Bleiberg, H
Chibaudel, B
Diaz-Rubio, E
Douillard, J
Fuchs, C
Giantonio, B
Goldberg, R
Heinemann, V
Koopman, M
Labianca, R
Larsen, A
Maughan, T
Mitchell, E
Peeters, M
Punt, C
Schmoll, H
Tournigand, C
De Gramont, A
author_facet Bonnetain, F
Borg, C
Adams, R
Ajani, J
Benson, A
Bleiberg, H
Chibaudel, B
Diaz-Rubio, E
Douillard, J
Fuchs, C
Giantonio, B
Goldberg, R
Heinemann, V
Koopman, M
Labianca, R
Larsen, A
Maughan, T
Mitchell, E
Peeters, M
Punt, C
Schmoll, H
Tournigand, C
De Gramont, A
author_sort Bonnetain, F
collection OXFORD
description Traditionally, the efficacy of cancer treatment in patients with advance or metastatic disease in clinical studies has been studied using overall survival and more recently tumor-based end points such as progression-free survival, measurements of response to treatment. However, these seem not to be the relevant clinical end points in current situation if such end points were no validated as surrogate of overall survival to demonstrate the clinical efficacy. Appropriate, meaningful, primary patient-oriented and patient-reported end points that adequately measure the effects of new therapeutic interventions are then crucial for the advancement of clinical research in metastatic colorectal cancer to complement the results of tumor-based end points. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is effectively an evaluation of quality of life and its relationship with health over time. HRQoL includes the patient report at least of the way a disease or its treatment affects its physical, emotional and social well-being. Over the past few years, several phase III trials in a variety of solid cancers have assessed the incremental value of HRQoL in addition to the traditional end points of tumor response and survival results. HRQoL could provide not only complementary clinical data to the primary outcomes, but also more precise predictive and prognostic value. This end point is useful for both clinicians and patients in order to achieve the dogma of precision medicine. The present article examines the use of HRQoL in phase III metastatic colorectal cancer clinical trials, outlines the importance of HRQoL assessment methods, analysis, and results presentation. Moreover, it discusses the relevance of including HRQoL as a primary/co-primary end point to support the progression-free survival results and to assess efficacy of treatment in the advanced disease setting.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T20:29:45Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:30a6010e-aaa6-44c7-99ce-2f5b655386bf
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T20:29:45Z
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:30a6010e-aaa6-44c7-99ce-2f5b655386bf2022-03-26T13:02:48ZHow health-related quality of life assessment should be used in advanced colorectal cancer clinical trials Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:30a6010e-aaa6-44c7-99ce-2f5b655386bfEnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordOxford University Press2017Bonnetain, FBorg, CAdams, RAjani, JBenson, ABleiberg, HChibaudel, BDiaz-Rubio, EDouillard, JFuchs, CGiantonio, BGoldberg, RHeinemann, VKoopman, MLabianca, RLarsen, AMaughan, TMitchell, EPeeters, MPunt, CSchmoll, HTournigand, CDe Gramont, ATraditionally, the efficacy of cancer treatment in patients with advance or metastatic disease in clinical studies has been studied using overall survival and more recently tumor-based end points such as progression-free survival, measurements of response to treatment. However, these seem not to be the relevant clinical end points in current situation if such end points were no validated as surrogate of overall survival to demonstrate the clinical efficacy. Appropriate, meaningful, primary patient-oriented and patient-reported end points that adequately measure the effects of new therapeutic interventions are then crucial for the advancement of clinical research in metastatic colorectal cancer to complement the results of tumor-based end points. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is effectively an evaluation of quality of life and its relationship with health over time. HRQoL includes the patient report at least of the way a disease or its treatment affects its physical, emotional and social well-being. Over the past few years, several phase III trials in a variety of solid cancers have assessed the incremental value of HRQoL in addition to the traditional end points of tumor response and survival results. HRQoL could provide not only complementary clinical data to the primary outcomes, but also more precise predictive and prognostic value. This end point is useful for both clinicians and patients in order to achieve the dogma of precision medicine. The present article examines the use of HRQoL in phase III metastatic colorectal cancer clinical trials, outlines the importance of HRQoL assessment methods, analysis, and results presentation. Moreover, it discusses the relevance of including HRQoL as a primary/co-primary end point to support the progression-free survival results and to assess efficacy of treatment in the advanced disease setting.
spellingShingle Bonnetain, F
Borg, C
Adams, R
Ajani, J
Benson, A
Bleiberg, H
Chibaudel, B
Diaz-Rubio, E
Douillard, J
Fuchs, C
Giantonio, B
Goldberg, R
Heinemann, V
Koopman, M
Labianca, R
Larsen, A
Maughan, T
Mitchell, E
Peeters, M
Punt, C
Schmoll, H
Tournigand, C
De Gramont, A
How health-related quality of life assessment should be used in advanced colorectal cancer clinical trials
title How health-related quality of life assessment should be used in advanced colorectal cancer clinical trials
title_full How health-related quality of life assessment should be used in advanced colorectal cancer clinical trials
title_fullStr How health-related quality of life assessment should be used in advanced colorectal cancer clinical trials
title_full_unstemmed How health-related quality of life assessment should be used in advanced colorectal cancer clinical trials
title_short How health-related quality of life assessment should be used in advanced colorectal cancer clinical trials
title_sort how health related quality of life assessment should be used in advanced colorectal cancer clinical trials
work_keys_str_mv AT bonnetainf howhealthrelatedqualityoflifeassessmentshouldbeusedinadvancedcolorectalcancerclinicaltrials
AT borgc howhealthrelatedqualityoflifeassessmentshouldbeusedinadvancedcolorectalcancerclinicaltrials
AT adamsr howhealthrelatedqualityoflifeassessmentshouldbeusedinadvancedcolorectalcancerclinicaltrials
AT ajanij howhealthrelatedqualityoflifeassessmentshouldbeusedinadvancedcolorectalcancerclinicaltrials
AT bensona howhealthrelatedqualityoflifeassessmentshouldbeusedinadvancedcolorectalcancerclinicaltrials
AT bleibergh howhealthrelatedqualityoflifeassessmentshouldbeusedinadvancedcolorectalcancerclinicaltrials
AT chibaudelb howhealthrelatedqualityoflifeassessmentshouldbeusedinadvancedcolorectalcancerclinicaltrials
AT diazrubioe howhealthrelatedqualityoflifeassessmentshouldbeusedinadvancedcolorectalcancerclinicaltrials
AT douillardj howhealthrelatedqualityoflifeassessmentshouldbeusedinadvancedcolorectalcancerclinicaltrials
AT fuchsc howhealthrelatedqualityoflifeassessmentshouldbeusedinadvancedcolorectalcancerclinicaltrials
AT giantoniob howhealthrelatedqualityoflifeassessmentshouldbeusedinadvancedcolorectalcancerclinicaltrials
AT goldbergr howhealthrelatedqualityoflifeassessmentshouldbeusedinadvancedcolorectalcancerclinicaltrials
AT heinemannv howhealthrelatedqualityoflifeassessmentshouldbeusedinadvancedcolorectalcancerclinicaltrials
AT koopmanm howhealthrelatedqualityoflifeassessmentshouldbeusedinadvancedcolorectalcancerclinicaltrials
AT labiancar howhealthrelatedqualityoflifeassessmentshouldbeusedinadvancedcolorectalcancerclinicaltrials
AT larsena howhealthrelatedqualityoflifeassessmentshouldbeusedinadvancedcolorectalcancerclinicaltrials
AT maughant howhealthrelatedqualityoflifeassessmentshouldbeusedinadvancedcolorectalcancerclinicaltrials
AT mitchelle howhealthrelatedqualityoflifeassessmentshouldbeusedinadvancedcolorectalcancerclinicaltrials
AT peetersm howhealthrelatedqualityoflifeassessmentshouldbeusedinadvancedcolorectalcancerclinicaltrials
AT puntc howhealthrelatedqualityoflifeassessmentshouldbeusedinadvancedcolorectalcancerclinicaltrials
AT schmollh howhealthrelatedqualityoflifeassessmentshouldbeusedinadvancedcolorectalcancerclinicaltrials
AT tournigandc howhealthrelatedqualityoflifeassessmentshouldbeusedinadvancedcolorectalcancerclinicaltrials
AT degramonta howhealthrelatedqualityoflifeassessmentshouldbeusedinadvancedcolorectalcancerclinicaltrials