A process for prioritising systematic reviews in tinnitus
<p><strong>Objective:</strong> To develop an innovative prioritisation process to identify topics for new or updated systematic reviews of tinnitus research.</p> <p><strong>Design:</strong> A two-stage prioritisation process was devised. First, a scoping re...
Main Authors: | Sereda, M, McFerran, D, Axon, E, Cox, S, Et al. |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Taylor & Francis
2020
|
Similar Items
-
Stakeholder quantification and prioritisation research: A systematic literature review
by: Hujainah, Fadhl, et al.
Published: (2018) -
Lack of systematicity in research prioritisation processes — a scoping review of evidence syntheses
by: Hans Lund, et al.
Published: (2022-12-01) -
Determining the Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Tinnitus, Depression, and Anxiety: A Systematic Review
by: Bas Labree, et al.
Published: (2022-04-01) -
A multicomponent decision tool for prioritising the updating of systematic reviews.
by: Takwoingi, Y, et al.
Published: (2013) -
Prediction Models for Tinnitus Presence and the Impact of Tinnitus on Daily Life: A Systematic Review
by: Maaike M. Rademaker, et al.
Published: (2023-01-01)