A process for prioritising systematic reviews in tinnitus
<p><strong>Objective:</strong> To develop an innovative prioritisation process to identify topics for new or updated systematic reviews of tinnitus research.</p> <p><strong>Design:</strong> A two-stage prioritisation process was devised. First, a scoping re...
Auteurs principaux: | Sereda, M, McFerran, D, Axon, E, Cox, S, Et al. |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Langue: | English |
Publié: |
Taylor & Francis
2020
|
Documents similaires
-
Why Is There No Cure for Tinnitus?
par: Don J. McFerran, et autres
Publié: (2019-08-01) -
Tinnitus services in the United Kingdom: a survey of patient experiences
par: Don McFerran, et autres
Publié: (2018-02-01) -
Determining the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on tinnitus and tinnitus-related outcomes: protocol for a systematic review
par: Derek J Hoare, et autres
Publié: (2021-03-01) -
Neuromodulation Treatments Targeting Pathological Synchrony for Tinnitus in Adults: A Systematic Review
par: Derek J. Hoare, et autres
Publié: (2024-07-01) -
Lack of systematicity in research prioritisation processes — a scoping review of evidence syntheses
par: Hans Lund, et autres
Publié: (2022-12-01)