Influence of research evidence on the use of cardiovascular clinical prediction rules in primary care: an exploratory qualitative interview study
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiovascular clinical prediction rules (CPRs) are widely used in primary care. They accumulate research evidence through derivation, external validation, and impact studies. However, existing knowledge about the influence of research evidence on th...
Main Authors: | Ban, J-W, Perera, R, Williams, V |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Similar Items
-
Influence of research evidence on the use of cardiovascular clinical prediction rules in primary care: an exploratory qualitative interview study
by: Jong- Wook Ban, et al.
Published: (2023-09-01) -
African Primary Care Research: Qualitative interviewing in primary care
by: Steve Reid, et al.
Published: (2014-01-01) -
Exploratory Visuals and Text in Qualitative Research Interviews: How Do We Respond?
by: Jude Page, et al.
Published: (2022-06-01) -
Why do authors derive new cardiovascular clinical prediction rules in the presence of existing rules? A mixed methods study
by: Ban, J, et al.
Published: (2017) -
GPs' familiarity with and use of cardiovascular clinical prediction rules: a UK survey study
by: Ban, J-W, et al.
Published: (2020)