Imaging neuroendocrine tumours with radiolabelled somatostatin analogues and X-ray computed tomography: a comparative study.

Various endocrine neoplasms, including a number of carcinoid and pancreatic islet cell tumours, express somatostatin receptors. These tumours may be difficult to localize using conventional techniques. Radiolabelled somatostatin analogues 123I-Tyr-3-octreotide and 111In-pentatreotide have been used...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: King, C, Reznek, R, Bomanji, J, Ur, E, Britton, K, Grossman, AB, Besser, G
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 1993
_version_ 1797061476661329920
author King, C
Reznek, R
Bomanji, J
Ur, E
Britton, K
Grossman, AB
Besser, G
author_facet King, C
Reznek, R
Bomanji, J
Ur, E
Britton, K
Grossman, AB
Besser, G
author_sort King, C
collection OXFORD
description Various endocrine neoplasms, including a number of carcinoid and pancreatic islet cell tumours, express somatostatin receptors. These tumours may be difficult to localize using conventional techniques. Radiolabelled somatostatin analogues 123I-Tyr-3-octreotide and 111In-pentatreotide have been used for imaging these tumours. In a retrospective study of 24 patients, the sensitivities of somatostatin receptor scintigraphy and X-ray computed tomography (CT) were compared. Ten patients were scanned using 123I-Tyr-3-octreotide and 14 with 111In-pentatreotide. All patients had CT scans. Twenty patients had neuroendocrine tumours with a total of 45 lesions in the anatomical areas included on both scans. CT detected 42 while somatostatin receptor scanning detected 31 of these lesions. Three lesions were missed by CT which were detected by scintigraphy, and there were six CT false positive lesions. In a further four patients investigated for suspected neuroendocrine tumours, no lesion was shown using either modality and subsequent investigations and clinical follow-up have shown no evidence of a tumour. We conclude that while CT is more sensitive than somatostatin receptor scintigraphy, the techniques are complementary, especially in patients with disseminated pathology, equivocal lesions on CT, or a negative CT and strong clinical or biochemical evidence of a neuroendocrine tumour.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T20:31:43Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:31462fec-60a6-4124-8405-d68f728d6c22
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T20:31:43Z
publishDate 1993
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:31462fec-60a6-4124-8405-d68f728d6c222022-03-26T13:06:48ZImaging neuroendocrine tumours with radiolabelled somatostatin analogues and X-ray computed tomography: a comparative study.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:31462fec-60a6-4124-8405-d68f728d6c22EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford1993King, CReznek, RBomanji, JUr, EBritton, KGrossman, ABBesser, GVarious endocrine neoplasms, including a number of carcinoid and pancreatic islet cell tumours, express somatostatin receptors. These tumours may be difficult to localize using conventional techniques. Radiolabelled somatostatin analogues 123I-Tyr-3-octreotide and 111In-pentatreotide have been used for imaging these tumours. In a retrospective study of 24 patients, the sensitivities of somatostatin receptor scintigraphy and X-ray computed tomography (CT) were compared. Ten patients were scanned using 123I-Tyr-3-octreotide and 14 with 111In-pentatreotide. All patients had CT scans. Twenty patients had neuroendocrine tumours with a total of 45 lesions in the anatomical areas included on both scans. CT detected 42 while somatostatin receptor scanning detected 31 of these lesions. Three lesions were missed by CT which were detected by scintigraphy, and there were six CT false positive lesions. In a further four patients investigated for suspected neuroendocrine tumours, no lesion was shown using either modality and subsequent investigations and clinical follow-up have shown no evidence of a tumour. We conclude that while CT is more sensitive than somatostatin receptor scintigraphy, the techniques are complementary, especially in patients with disseminated pathology, equivocal lesions on CT, or a negative CT and strong clinical or biochemical evidence of a neuroendocrine tumour.
spellingShingle King, C
Reznek, R
Bomanji, J
Ur, E
Britton, K
Grossman, AB
Besser, G
Imaging neuroendocrine tumours with radiolabelled somatostatin analogues and X-ray computed tomography: a comparative study.
title Imaging neuroendocrine tumours with radiolabelled somatostatin analogues and X-ray computed tomography: a comparative study.
title_full Imaging neuroendocrine tumours with radiolabelled somatostatin analogues and X-ray computed tomography: a comparative study.
title_fullStr Imaging neuroendocrine tumours with radiolabelled somatostatin analogues and X-ray computed tomography: a comparative study.
title_full_unstemmed Imaging neuroendocrine tumours with radiolabelled somatostatin analogues and X-ray computed tomography: a comparative study.
title_short Imaging neuroendocrine tumours with radiolabelled somatostatin analogues and X-ray computed tomography: a comparative study.
title_sort imaging neuroendocrine tumours with radiolabelled somatostatin analogues and x ray computed tomography a comparative study
work_keys_str_mv AT kingc imagingneuroendocrinetumourswithradiolabelledsomatostatinanaloguesandxraycomputedtomographyacomparativestudy
AT reznekr imagingneuroendocrinetumourswithradiolabelledsomatostatinanaloguesandxraycomputedtomographyacomparativestudy
AT bomanjij imagingneuroendocrinetumourswithradiolabelledsomatostatinanaloguesandxraycomputedtomographyacomparativestudy
AT ure imagingneuroendocrinetumourswithradiolabelledsomatostatinanaloguesandxraycomputedtomographyacomparativestudy
AT brittonk imagingneuroendocrinetumourswithradiolabelledsomatostatinanaloguesandxraycomputedtomographyacomparativestudy
AT grossmanab imagingneuroendocrinetumourswithradiolabelledsomatostatinanaloguesandxraycomputedtomographyacomparativestudy
AT besserg imagingneuroendocrinetumourswithradiolabelledsomatostatinanaloguesandxraycomputedtomographyacomparativestudy