Cranial ecomorphology of turtles and neck retraction as a possible trigger of ecological diversification

Turtles have a highly modified body plan, including a rigid shell that constrains postcranial anatomy. Skull morphology and neck mobility may therefore be key to ecological specialization in turtles. However, the ecological signal of turtle skull morphologies has not been rigorously evaluated, leavi...

সম্পূর্ণ বিবরণ

গ্রন্থ-পঞ্জীর বিবরন
প্রধান লেখক: Hermanson, G, Evers, SW, Farina, BM, Ferreira, GS, Langer, MC, Benson, RBJ
বিন্যাস: Journal article
ভাষা:English
প্রকাশিত: Wiley 2022
_version_ 1826309260188844032
author Hermanson, G
Evers, SW
Farina, BM
Ferreira, GS
Langer, MC
Benson, RBJ
author_facet Hermanson, G
Evers, SW
Farina, BM
Ferreira, GS
Langer, MC
Benson, RBJ
author_sort Hermanson, G
collection OXFORD
description Turtles have a highly modified body plan, including a rigid shell that constrains postcranial anatomy. Skull morphology and neck mobility may therefore be key to ecological specialization in turtles. However, the ecological signal of turtle skull morphologies has not been rigorously evaluated, leaving uncertainties about the roles of ecological adaptation and convergence. We evaluate turtle cranial ecomorphology using three-dimensional geometric morphometrics and phylogenetic comparative methods. Skull shape correlates with allometry, neck retraction capability, and different aquatic feeding ecologies. We find that ecological variables influence skull shape only, whereas a key functional variable (the capacity for neck retraction) influences both shape and size. Ecology and functional predictions from three-dimensional shape are validated by high success rates for extant species, outperforming previous two-dimensional approaches. We use this to infer ecological and functional traits of extinct species. Neck retraction evolved among crownward stem-turtles by the Late Jurassic, signaling functional decoupling of the skull and neck from the shell, possibly linked to a major episode of ecomorphological diversification. We also find strong evidence for convergent ecological adaptations among marine groups. This includes parallel loss of neck retraction, evidence for active hunting, possible grazing, and suction feeding in extinct marine groups. Our large-scale assessment of dietary and functional adaptation throughout turtle evolution reveals the timing and origin of their distinct ecomorphologies, and highlights the potential for ecology and function to have distinct effects on skull form.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T07:31:31Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:320e6aa4-9c45-4843-8634-2f261b9684ce
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T07:31:31Z
publishDate 2022
publisher Wiley
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:320e6aa4-9c45-4843-8634-2f261b9684ce2023-02-08T09:41:16ZCranial ecomorphology of turtles and neck retraction as a possible trigger of ecological diversificationJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:320e6aa4-9c45-4843-8634-2f261b9684ceEnglishSymplectic ElementsWiley2022Hermanson, GEvers, SWFarina, BMFerreira, GSLanger, MCBenson, RBJTurtles have a highly modified body plan, including a rigid shell that constrains postcranial anatomy. Skull morphology and neck mobility may therefore be key to ecological specialization in turtles. However, the ecological signal of turtle skull morphologies has not been rigorously evaluated, leaving uncertainties about the roles of ecological adaptation and convergence. We evaluate turtle cranial ecomorphology using three-dimensional geometric morphometrics and phylogenetic comparative methods. Skull shape correlates with allometry, neck retraction capability, and different aquatic feeding ecologies. We find that ecological variables influence skull shape only, whereas a key functional variable (the capacity for neck retraction) influences both shape and size. Ecology and functional predictions from three-dimensional shape are validated by high success rates for extant species, outperforming previous two-dimensional approaches. We use this to infer ecological and functional traits of extinct species. Neck retraction evolved among crownward stem-turtles by the Late Jurassic, signaling functional decoupling of the skull and neck from the shell, possibly linked to a major episode of ecomorphological diversification. We also find strong evidence for convergent ecological adaptations among marine groups. This includes parallel loss of neck retraction, evidence for active hunting, possible grazing, and suction feeding in extinct marine groups. Our large-scale assessment of dietary and functional adaptation throughout turtle evolution reveals the timing and origin of their distinct ecomorphologies, and highlights the potential for ecology and function to have distinct effects on skull form.
spellingShingle Hermanson, G
Evers, SW
Farina, BM
Ferreira, GS
Langer, MC
Benson, RBJ
Cranial ecomorphology of turtles and neck retraction as a possible trigger of ecological diversification
title Cranial ecomorphology of turtles and neck retraction as a possible trigger of ecological diversification
title_full Cranial ecomorphology of turtles and neck retraction as a possible trigger of ecological diversification
title_fullStr Cranial ecomorphology of turtles and neck retraction as a possible trigger of ecological diversification
title_full_unstemmed Cranial ecomorphology of turtles and neck retraction as a possible trigger of ecological diversification
title_short Cranial ecomorphology of turtles and neck retraction as a possible trigger of ecological diversification
title_sort cranial ecomorphology of turtles and neck retraction as a possible trigger of ecological diversification
work_keys_str_mv AT hermansong cranialecomorphologyofturtlesandneckretractionasapossibletriggerofecologicaldiversification
AT everssw cranialecomorphologyofturtlesandneckretractionasapossibletriggerofecologicaldiversification
AT farinabm cranialecomorphologyofturtlesandneckretractionasapossibletriggerofecologicaldiversification
AT ferreirags cranialecomorphologyofturtlesandneckretractionasapossibletriggerofecologicaldiversification
AT langermc cranialecomorphologyofturtlesandneckretractionasapossibletriggerofecologicaldiversification
AT bensonrbj cranialecomorphologyofturtlesandneckretractionasapossibletriggerofecologicaldiversification