How can we improve surgical research and innovation?: the IDEAL framework for action.

How can we improve surgical research and innovation?: the IDEAL framework for action.

Show other versions (1)

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Hirst, A, Agha, R, Rosin, D, McCulloch, P
Format:	Journal article
Language:	English
Published:	2013

Similar Items

How can we improve surgical research and innovation?: The IDEAL framework for action
by: Hirst, A, et al.
Published: (2013)

IDEAL framework for surgical innovation 1: the idea and development stages.
by: McCulloch, P, et al.
Published: (2013)

Identifying research waste from surgical research: a protocol for assessing compliance with the IDEAL framework and recommendations
by: Xin Sun, et al.
Published: (2021-06-01)

No surgical innovation without evaluation: evolution and further development of the IDEAL framework and recommendations
by: Hirst, A, et al.
Published: (2018)

IDEAL framework for surgical innovation 2: observational studies in the exploration and assessment stages.
by: Ergina, P, et al.
Published: (2013)

The IDEAL recommendations and urological innovation.
by: McCulloch, P
Published: (2011)

How to improve surgical research
by: McCulloch, P
Published: (2011)

How to improve surgical research.
by: McCulloch, P
Published: (2011)

Evidence-based evaluation of practice and innovation in physical therapy using the IDEAL-Physio framework
by: Beard, D, et al.
Published: (2017)

No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations
by: McCulloch, M, et al.
Published: (2009)

Surgical Innovation and Evaluation 3 No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations
by: McCulloch, P, et al.
Published: (2009)

Innovation or regulation: IDEAL opportunity for consensus.
by: McCulloch, P, et al.
Published: (2010)

Evidence based evaluation of practice using the ideal-physio framework. A strategic method of evaluating innovation and current practice
by: Beard, D, et al.
Published: (2017)

How do we make facial expressions? A study into how modelling can aid in the public's understanding of the muscles of facial expression
by: Victoria McCulloch
Published: (2020-06-01)

IDEAL framework for surgical innovation 3: randomised controlled trials in the assessment stage and evaluations in the long term study stage.
by: Cook, J, et al.
Published: (2013)

Hey, I Just Did a Better Operation! Toward an IDEAL Innovation Model
by: Sood, A, et al.
Published: (2017)

The IDEAL prospective development study format for reporting surgical innovations. An illustrative case study of robotic oesophagectomy
by: Diez Del Val, I, et al.
Published: (2015)

IDEAL-D: a rational framework for evaluating and regulating the use of medical devices
by: Sedrakyan, A, et al.
Published: (2016)

Application of the IDEAL framework to robotic urologic surgery.
by: Dahm, P, et al.
Published: (2014)

No frugal innovation without frugal evaluation: the Global IDEAL Sub-Framework
by: Bolton, WS, et al.
Published: (2024)

Progress in clinical research in surgery and IDEAL
by: McCulloch, P, et al.
Published: (2018)

Ensuring safe surgical innovation in your hospital: Do try this at home
by: McCulloch, P
Published: (2019)

No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations.
by: McCulloch, P, et al.
Published: (2009)

How can we enhance creativity in childhood? An action research with Italian children
by: Maria Elvira De Caroli, et al.
Published: (2017-10-01)

How can we carry out an action-research to improve practice in the science classroom?
by: Bartolomé Vázquez Bernal, et al.
Published: (2008-01-01)

Surgical professionalism in the 21st century.
by: McCulloch, P
Published: (2006)

Developing appropriate methodology for the study of surgical techniques.
by: McCulloch, P
Published: (2009)

How Can We Help?
by: Joshua Waltman, et al.
Published: (2020-10-01)

Developing innovation in online learning : an action research framework /
by: 240805 McPherson, Maggie, et al.
Published: (2004)

Examining the empirical evidence for IDEAL 2b studies: the effects of preceding prospective collaborative cohort studies on the quality and impact of subsequent randomized controlled trials of surgical innovations – protocol for a systematic review and case–control analysis
by: Peter McCulloch, et al.
Published: (2022-10-01)

How to tie dangerous surgical knots: easily. Can we avoid this?
by: Eric Drabble, et al.
Published: (2021-10-01)

How can we further the development of nursing research?
by: Ingalill Rahm Hallberg
Published: (2015-10-01)

How do Lebanese patients perceive the ideal doctor based on the CanMEDS competency framework?
by: Mabel Aoun, et al.
Published: (2019-10-01)

IDEAL as a guide to designing clinical device studies consistent with the new European Medical Device Regulation
by: Peter McCulloch, et al.
Published: (2021-06-01)

Can We Use 1D Models to Predict 3D Model Response to Forcing in an Idealized Framework?
by: Y.‐L. Hwong, et al.
Published: (2022-04-01)

Surgical specialty, surgical unit volume and mortality after oesophageal cancer surgery.
by: Leigh, Y, et al.
Published: (2009)

The pandemic, protests, and social innovation: How can we maintain our progress?
by: Rachel Bromberg
Published: (2021-09-01)

Can we attain the ideal of objectivity in the field of public health nutrition?
by: Ted Greiner
Published: (2021-03-01)

Can we abandon foregut exclusion for an ideal and safe metabolic surgery?
by: Jason Widjaja, et al.
Published: (2022-11-01)

How can we reduce biomedical research's carbon footprint?
by: Frank J Kelly
Published: (2023-11-01)