A questionnaire elicitation of surgeons' belief about learning within a surgical trial

Introduction Surgeons gain expertise as they repeatedly conduct a procedure. Such learning is widely acknowledged to pose a challenge to evaluating new surgical procedures. Most surgical trials report little if any information on learning. We elicited surgeons’ belief regarding learning within the c...

Повний опис

Бібліографічні деталі
Автори: Cook, J, Ramsay, C, Carr, A, Rees, J
Формат: Journal article
Мова:English
Опубліковано: Public Library of Science 2012
_version_ 1826266306496692224
author Cook, J
Ramsay, C
Carr, A
Rees, J
author_facet Cook, J
Ramsay, C
Carr, A
Rees, J
author_sort Cook, J
collection OXFORD
description Introduction Surgeons gain expertise as they repeatedly conduct a procedure. Such learning is widely acknowledged to pose a challenge to evaluating new surgical procedures. Most surgical trials report little if any information on learning. We elicited surgeons’ belief regarding learning within the context of a randomised trial which assessed two surgical procedures. Materials and Methods Surgeons participating in the UKUFF trial were sent a postal questionnaire requesting details on current practice, prior experience and their belief regarding acquiring proficiency and the learning curve of operation time for two surgical procedures (open and arthroscopic rotator cuff repair). Results In total 52 (58%) participating surgeons returned a completed questionnaire. The median (IQR) number of procedures required to acquire proficiency were 17 (10,23) and 35 (23,50) for the open and arthroscopic repairs respectively. The distribution of surgeons’ belief regarding the initial point had median (IQR) of 109 (69,128) and 145 (97,171) minutes for open and arthroscopic repair respectively. Corresponding values for the plateau point were 60 (46, 82) and 79 (58, 110). Conclusions We have shown that information on the current practice, prior experience and beliefs on the learning process of a surgical procedure can be elicited using a short questionnaire. The approach could aid the interpretation of trial results in terms of generalisability and be used a priori in the design of a trial.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T20:36:54Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:32f130fb-b5ec-40c3-a691-6d0dffa4ee84
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T20:36:54Z
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:32f130fb-b5ec-40c3-a691-6d0dffa4ee842022-03-26T13:17:11ZA questionnaire elicitation of surgeons' belief about learning within a surgical trialJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:32f130fb-b5ec-40c3-a691-6d0dffa4ee84EnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordPublic Library of Science2012Cook, JRamsay, CCarr, ARees, JIntroduction Surgeons gain expertise as they repeatedly conduct a procedure. Such learning is widely acknowledged to pose a challenge to evaluating new surgical procedures. Most surgical trials report little if any information on learning. We elicited surgeons’ belief regarding learning within the context of a randomised trial which assessed two surgical procedures. Materials and Methods Surgeons participating in the UKUFF trial were sent a postal questionnaire requesting details on current practice, prior experience and their belief regarding acquiring proficiency and the learning curve of operation time for two surgical procedures (open and arthroscopic rotator cuff repair). Results In total 52 (58%) participating surgeons returned a completed questionnaire. The median (IQR) number of procedures required to acquire proficiency were 17 (10,23) and 35 (23,50) for the open and arthroscopic repairs respectively. The distribution of surgeons’ belief regarding the initial point had median (IQR) of 109 (69,128) and 145 (97,171) minutes for open and arthroscopic repair respectively. Corresponding values for the plateau point were 60 (46, 82) and 79 (58, 110). Conclusions We have shown that information on the current practice, prior experience and beliefs on the learning process of a surgical procedure can be elicited using a short questionnaire. The approach could aid the interpretation of trial results in terms of generalisability and be used a priori in the design of a trial.
spellingShingle Cook, J
Ramsay, C
Carr, A
Rees, J
A questionnaire elicitation of surgeons' belief about learning within a surgical trial
title A questionnaire elicitation of surgeons' belief about learning within a surgical trial
title_full A questionnaire elicitation of surgeons' belief about learning within a surgical trial
title_fullStr A questionnaire elicitation of surgeons' belief about learning within a surgical trial
title_full_unstemmed A questionnaire elicitation of surgeons' belief about learning within a surgical trial
title_short A questionnaire elicitation of surgeons' belief about learning within a surgical trial
title_sort questionnaire elicitation of surgeons belief about learning within a surgical trial
work_keys_str_mv AT cookj aquestionnaireelicitationofsurgeonsbeliefaboutlearningwithinasurgicaltrial
AT ramsayc aquestionnaireelicitationofsurgeonsbeliefaboutlearningwithinasurgicaltrial
AT carra aquestionnaireelicitationofsurgeonsbeliefaboutlearningwithinasurgicaltrial
AT reesj aquestionnaireelicitationofsurgeonsbeliefaboutlearningwithinasurgicaltrial
AT cookj questionnaireelicitationofsurgeonsbeliefaboutlearningwithinasurgicaltrial
AT ramsayc questionnaireelicitationofsurgeonsbeliefaboutlearningwithinasurgicaltrial
AT carra questionnaireelicitationofsurgeonsbeliefaboutlearningwithinasurgicaltrial
AT reesj questionnaireelicitationofsurgeonsbeliefaboutlearningwithinasurgicaltrial