Cost Asymmetries in International Subsidy Games: Should Governments Help Winners or Losers?

This paper examines the optimality of export subsidies in oligopolistic markets, when home and foreign firms have different costs and there is an opportunity cost to public funds. Subsidies are found to be optimal only for surprisingly low values of the shadow price of government funds, and if subsi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Neary, J
Format: Working paper
Language:English
Published: CEPR 1991
_version_ 1826266388343291904
author Neary, J
author_facet Neary, J
author_sort Neary, J
collection OXFORD
description This paper examines the optimality of export subsidies in oligopolistic markets, when home and foreign firms have different costs and there is an opportunity cost to public funds. Subsidies are found to be optimal only for surprisingly low values of the shadow price of government funds, and if subsidies are justified they should be higher the more cost-competitive are domestic firms. These results hold under both Cournot competition and Bertrand competition when firms move before governments. The results suggest that recent arguments for export subsidies apply only for firms that would be highly profitable even without subsidies.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T20:38:10Z
format Working paper
id oxford-uuid:3354411a-955a-476f-b4fd-6208300a6979
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T20:38:10Z
publishDate 1991
publisher CEPR
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:3354411a-955a-476f-b4fd-6208300a69792022-03-26T13:19:37ZCost Asymmetries in International Subsidy Games: Should Governments Help Winners or Losers?Working paperhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_8042uuid:3354411a-955a-476f-b4fd-6208300a6979EnglishDepartment of Economics - ePrintsCEPR1991Neary, JThis paper examines the optimality of export subsidies in oligopolistic markets, when home and foreign firms have different costs and there is an opportunity cost to public funds. Subsidies are found to be optimal only for surprisingly low values of the shadow price of government funds, and if subsidies are justified they should be higher the more cost-competitive are domestic firms. These results hold under both Cournot competition and Bertrand competition when firms move before governments. The results suggest that recent arguments for export subsidies apply only for firms that would be highly profitable even without subsidies.
spellingShingle Neary, J
Cost Asymmetries in International Subsidy Games: Should Governments Help Winners or Losers?
title Cost Asymmetries in International Subsidy Games: Should Governments Help Winners or Losers?
title_full Cost Asymmetries in International Subsidy Games: Should Governments Help Winners or Losers?
title_fullStr Cost Asymmetries in International Subsidy Games: Should Governments Help Winners or Losers?
title_full_unstemmed Cost Asymmetries in International Subsidy Games: Should Governments Help Winners or Losers?
title_short Cost Asymmetries in International Subsidy Games: Should Governments Help Winners or Losers?
title_sort cost asymmetries in international subsidy games should governments help winners or losers
work_keys_str_mv AT nearyj costasymmetriesininternationalsubsidygamesshouldgovernmentshelpwinnersorlosers