Impatience and incentives: the possibility of industrial policy.

In this paper I will outline and analyze Sanjaya Lall’s view of the development process in “latecomer countries” by discussing both the positive aspects of his vision (the nature of technological knowledge and technological capabilities) and the normative aspects of his vision (the promotion of comp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Latsch, W
Format: Working paper
Language:English
Published: QEH (University of Oxford) 2007
_version_ 1797061948763799552
author Latsch, W
author_facet Latsch, W
author_sort Latsch, W
collection OXFORD
description In this paper I will outline and analyze Sanjaya Lall’s view of the development process in “latecomer countries” by discussing both the positive aspects of his vision (the nature of technological knowledge and technological capabilities) and the normative aspects of his vision (the promotion of competitiveness). I will evaluate his contributions in terms of (1) the debate on the nature of knowledge and its implications in terms of market failure and, consequently, the necessity of industrial policy, (2) the debate on the political economy of industrial policy in terms of the costs of discretionary policy interventions and, consequently, the possibility of industrial policy. The broad validity and promise of Lall’s vision of late-industrializing development depends on establishing the grounds for both the positive dimensions (necessity) and the normative dimensions (possibility) of industrial policy. The possibility of industrial policy, in turn, is circumscribed by the ability to control the potential costs of discretionary government – itself a function of the “social capital” that was a late concern of Sanjaya Lall’s.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T20:38:30Z
format Working paper
id oxford-uuid:3370f54a-559f-4b72-b55a-23d4a7a47fcc
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T20:38:30Z
publishDate 2007
publisher QEH (University of Oxford)
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:3370f54a-559f-4b72-b55a-23d4a7a47fcc2022-03-26T13:20:18ZImpatience and incentives: the possibility of industrial policy.Working paperhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_8042uuid:3370f54a-559f-4b72-b55a-23d4a7a47fccEnglishDepartment of Economics - ePrintsQEH (University of Oxford)2007Latsch, WIn this paper I will outline and analyze Sanjaya Lall’s view of the development process in “latecomer countries” by discussing both the positive aspects of his vision (the nature of technological knowledge and technological capabilities) and the normative aspects of his vision (the promotion of competitiveness). I will evaluate his contributions in terms of (1) the debate on the nature of knowledge and its implications in terms of market failure and, consequently, the necessity of industrial policy, (2) the debate on the political economy of industrial policy in terms of the costs of discretionary policy interventions and, consequently, the possibility of industrial policy. The broad validity and promise of Lall’s vision of late-industrializing development depends on establishing the grounds for both the positive dimensions (necessity) and the normative dimensions (possibility) of industrial policy. The possibility of industrial policy, in turn, is circumscribed by the ability to control the potential costs of discretionary government – itself a function of the “social capital” that was a late concern of Sanjaya Lall’s.
spellingShingle Latsch, W
Impatience and incentives: the possibility of industrial policy.
title Impatience and incentives: the possibility of industrial policy.
title_full Impatience and incentives: the possibility of industrial policy.
title_fullStr Impatience and incentives: the possibility of industrial policy.
title_full_unstemmed Impatience and incentives: the possibility of industrial policy.
title_short Impatience and incentives: the possibility of industrial policy.
title_sort impatience and incentives the possibility of industrial policy
work_keys_str_mv AT latschw impatienceandincentivesthepossibilityofindustrialpolicy