Results of the GREAT08 Challenge: An image analysis competition for cosmological lensing

We present the results of the GREAT08 Challenge, a blind analysis challenge to infer weak gravitational lensing shear distortions from images. The primary goal was to stimulate new ideas by presenting the problem to researchers outside the shear measurement community. Six GREAT08 Team methods were p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bridle, S, Balan, S, Bethge, M, Gentile, M, Harmeling, S, Heymans, C, Hirsch, M, Hosseini, R, Jarvis, M, Kirk, D, Kitching, T, Kuijken, K, Lewis, A, Paulin-Henriksson, S, Scholkopf, B, Velander, M, Voigt, L, Witherick, D, Amara, A, Bernstein, G, Courbin, F, Gill, M, Heavens, A, Mandelbaum, R, Massey, R
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 2009
_version_ 1797061973478735872
author Bridle, S
Balan, S
Bethge, M
Gentile, M
Harmeling, S
Heymans, C
Hirsch, M
Hosseini, R
Jarvis, M
Kirk, D
Kitching, T
Kuijken, K
Lewis, A
Paulin-Henriksson, S
Scholkopf, B
Velander, M
Voigt, L
Witherick, D
Amara, A
Bernstein, G
Courbin, F
Gill, M
Heavens, A
Mandelbaum, R
Massey, R
author_facet Bridle, S
Balan, S
Bethge, M
Gentile, M
Harmeling, S
Heymans, C
Hirsch, M
Hosseini, R
Jarvis, M
Kirk, D
Kitching, T
Kuijken, K
Lewis, A
Paulin-Henriksson, S
Scholkopf, B
Velander, M
Voigt, L
Witherick, D
Amara, A
Bernstein, G
Courbin, F
Gill, M
Heavens, A
Mandelbaum, R
Massey, R
author_sort Bridle, S
collection OXFORD
description We present the results of the GREAT08 Challenge, a blind analysis challenge to infer weak gravitational lensing shear distortions from images. The primary goal was to stimulate new ideas by presenting the problem to researchers outside the shear measurement community. Six GREAT08 Team methods were presented at the launch of the Challenge and five additional groups submitted results during the 6 month competition. Participants analyzed 30 million simulated galaxies with a range in signal to noise ratio, point-spread function ellipticity, galaxy size, and galaxy type. The large quantity of simulations allowed shear measurement methods to be assessed at a level of accuracy suitable for currently planned future cosmic shear observations for the first time. Different methods perform well in different parts of simulation parameter space and come close to the target level of accuracy in several of these. A number of fresh ideas have emerged as a result of the Challenge including a re-examination of the process of combining information from different galaxies, which reduces the dependence on realistic galaxy modelling. The image simulations will become increasingly sophisticated in future GREAT challenges, meanwhile the GREAT08 simulations remain as a benchmark for additional developments in shear measurement algorithms.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T20:38:52Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:3393568f-f594-45ac-9476-fbcdf2099395
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T20:38:52Z
publishDate 2009
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:3393568f-f594-45ac-9476-fbcdf20993952022-03-26T13:21:01ZResults of the GREAT08 Challenge: An image analysis competition for cosmological lensingJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:3393568f-f594-45ac-9476-fbcdf2099395EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2009Bridle, SBalan, SBethge, MGentile, MHarmeling, SHeymans, CHirsch, MHosseini, RJarvis, MKirk, DKitching, TKuijken, KLewis, APaulin-Henriksson, SScholkopf, BVelander, MVoigt, LWitherick, DAmara, ABernstein, GCourbin, FGill, MHeavens, AMandelbaum, RMassey, RWe present the results of the GREAT08 Challenge, a blind analysis challenge to infer weak gravitational lensing shear distortions from images. The primary goal was to stimulate new ideas by presenting the problem to researchers outside the shear measurement community. Six GREAT08 Team methods were presented at the launch of the Challenge and five additional groups submitted results during the 6 month competition. Participants analyzed 30 million simulated galaxies with a range in signal to noise ratio, point-spread function ellipticity, galaxy size, and galaxy type. The large quantity of simulations allowed shear measurement methods to be assessed at a level of accuracy suitable for currently planned future cosmic shear observations for the first time. Different methods perform well in different parts of simulation parameter space and come close to the target level of accuracy in several of these. A number of fresh ideas have emerged as a result of the Challenge including a re-examination of the process of combining information from different galaxies, which reduces the dependence on realistic galaxy modelling. The image simulations will become increasingly sophisticated in future GREAT challenges, meanwhile the GREAT08 simulations remain as a benchmark for additional developments in shear measurement algorithms.
spellingShingle Bridle, S
Balan, S
Bethge, M
Gentile, M
Harmeling, S
Heymans, C
Hirsch, M
Hosseini, R
Jarvis, M
Kirk, D
Kitching, T
Kuijken, K
Lewis, A
Paulin-Henriksson, S
Scholkopf, B
Velander, M
Voigt, L
Witherick, D
Amara, A
Bernstein, G
Courbin, F
Gill, M
Heavens, A
Mandelbaum, R
Massey, R
Results of the GREAT08 Challenge: An image analysis competition for cosmological lensing
title Results of the GREAT08 Challenge: An image analysis competition for cosmological lensing
title_full Results of the GREAT08 Challenge: An image analysis competition for cosmological lensing
title_fullStr Results of the GREAT08 Challenge: An image analysis competition for cosmological lensing
title_full_unstemmed Results of the GREAT08 Challenge: An image analysis competition for cosmological lensing
title_short Results of the GREAT08 Challenge: An image analysis competition for cosmological lensing
title_sort results of the great08 challenge an image analysis competition for cosmological lensing
work_keys_str_mv AT bridles resultsofthegreat08challengeanimageanalysiscompetitionforcosmologicallensing
AT balans resultsofthegreat08challengeanimageanalysiscompetitionforcosmologicallensing
AT bethgem resultsofthegreat08challengeanimageanalysiscompetitionforcosmologicallensing
AT gentilem resultsofthegreat08challengeanimageanalysiscompetitionforcosmologicallensing
AT harmelings resultsofthegreat08challengeanimageanalysiscompetitionforcosmologicallensing
AT heymansc resultsofthegreat08challengeanimageanalysiscompetitionforcosmologicallensing
AT hirschm resultsofthegreat08challengeanimageanalysiscompetitionforcosmologicallensing
AT hosseinir resultsofthegreat08challengeanimageanalysiscompetitionforcosmologicallensing
AT jarvism resultsofthegreat08challengeanimageanalysiscompetitionforcosmologicallensing
AT kirkd resultsofthegreat08challengeanimageanalysiscompetitionforcosmologicallensing
AT kitchingt resultsofthegreat08challengeanimageanalysiscompetitionforcosmologicallensing
AT kuijkenk resultsofthegreat08challengeanimageanalysiscompetitionforcosmologicallensing
AT lewisa resultsofthegreat08challengeanimageanalysiscompetitionforcosmologicallensing
AT paulinhenrikssons resultsofthegreat08challengeanimageanalysiscompetitionforcosmologicallensing
AT scholkopfb resultsofthegreat08challengeanimageanalysiscompetitionforcosmologicallensing
AT velanderm resultsofthegreat08challengeanimageanalysiscompetitionforcosmologicallensing
AT voigtl resultsofthegreat08challengeanimageanalysiscompetitionforcosmologicallensing
AT witherickd resultsofthegreat08challengeanimageanalysiscompetitionforcosmologicallensing
AT amaraa resultsofthegreat08challengeanimageanalysiscompetitionforcosmologicallensing
AT bernsteing resultsofthegreat08challengeanimageanalysiscompetitionforcosmologicallensing
AT courbinf resultsofthegreat08challengeanimageanalysiscompetitionforcosmologicallensing
AT gillm resultsofthegreat08challengeanimageanalysiscompetitionforcosmologicallensing
AT heavensa resultsofthegreat08challengeanimageanalysiscompetitionforcosmologicallensing
AT mandelbaumr resultsofthegreat08challengeanimageanalysiscompetitionforcosmologicallensing
AT masseyr resultsofthegreat08challengeanimageanalysiscompetitionforcosmologicallensing