Relational contracts and specific training

This paper explores the implications of specific training for relational contracts. A standard result for sustaining a relational contract is that the parties must jointly receive a surplus over what they can get by separating. This has been interpreted as employees with relational contracts having...

Fuld beskrivelse

Bibliografiske detaljer
Hovedforfatter: Malcomson, JM
Format: Journal article
Sprog:English
Udgivet: Elsevier 2014
_version_ 1826308339228737536
author Malcomson, JM
author_facet Malcomson, JM
author_sort Malcomson, JM
collection OXFORD
description This paper explores the implications of specific training for relational contracts. A standard result for sustaining a relational contract is that the parties must jointly receive a surplus over what they can get by separating. This has been interpreted as employees with relational contracts having discretely higher pay and productivity than inherently equally productive, or near equally productive, employees without relational contracts. Investment in specific training relaxes the incentive constraints on relational contracts, so the optimal level of investment can be higher for those with a relational contract than for those without, adding further to the productivity of those employed under a relational contract. But the additional cost of optimal investment precisely offsets the post-investment surplus for marginal employees in relational contracts, which removes the discontinuity in the joint payoff from a relational contract. An example shows that with optimal investment there may not even be a discontinuity in productivity between those employed with a relational contract and those employed without one because the incentive constraints on the former result in lower effort despite their higher training.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T07:18:04Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:33c27b14-a183-437f-adfc-c7db9c45f4b2
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T07:18:04Z
publishDate 2014
publisher Elsevier
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:33c27b14-a183-437f-adfc-c7db9c45f4b22022-09-08T10:16:14ZRelational contracts and specific trainingJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:33c27b14-a183-437f-adfc-c7db9c45f4b2EnglishORA DepositElsevier2014Malcomson, JMThis paper explores the implications of specific training for relational contracts. A standard result for sustaining a relational contract is that the parties must jointly receive a surplus over what they can get by separating. This has been interpreted as employees with relational contracts having discretely higher pay and productivity than inherently equally productive, or near equally productive, employees without relational contracts. Investment in specific training relaxes the incentive constraints on relational contracts, so the optimal level of investment can be higher for those with a relational contract than for those without, adding further to the productivity of those employed under a relational contract. But the additional cost of optimal investment precisely offsets the post-investment surplus for marginal employees in relational contracts, which removes the discontinuity in the joint payoff from a relational contract. An example shows that with optimal investment there may not even be a discontinuity in productivity between those employed with a relational contract and those employed without one because the incentive constraints on the former result in lower effort despite their higher training.
spellingShingle Malcomson, JM
Relational contracts and specific training
title Relational contracts and specific training
title_full Relational contracts and specific training
title_fullStr Relational contracts and specific training
title_full_unstemmed Relational contracts and specific training
title_short Relational contracts and specific training
title_sort relational contracts and specific training
work_keys_str_mv AT malcomsonjm relationalcontractsandspecifictraining